Cafferty File: What does it say about the Iowa caucuses that candidates who spend the

[piotr1]

What does it say about the Iowa caucuses that candidates who spend the most money don't necessarily win there?

http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/situation.room/

Send your answers to the question above here: http://www.cnn.com/feedback/forms/form5t.html

He might choose your answer and read it !!!!

 

[piotr1]

!!!!

 

[Energy]

4 p.m.: What does it say about the Iowa caucuses that candidates who spend the most money don't necessarily win there?

5 p.m.: Which candidates won't still be around after the Iowa caucuses and New Hampshire primary?

.

 

[RoyalShock]

I sent mine in:

I think there are two factors: 1) The candidate's message and his ability to communicate it, and 2) the amount of "free" coverage given by the media.

 

[piotr1]

everyone post your answers!

 

[akijikan]

Here's mine:

It says that people see through the constant barrage of advertisements and phone calls and signs. They see that the mainstream, big-money candidates are more of the same thing. They are sick of the same thing. They are ready for a Revolution -- A Ron Paul Revolution.

 

[Starwind]

Sent.

 

[Bossobass]

It says exactly this:
No matter how much money you have to spend, if you have nothing to say, and when there is an alternative choice like Congressman Ron Paul, you're wasting you time and money.

EDIT: Thanks for the heads up. Comment sent.

Bosso

 

[GOILLINI121]

Mine:

If Mitt Romney comes in any other place than 1st in the Iowa Caucuses it will show us that his campaign is simply not viable. With the amount of money that he has invested in Iowa, it will be obvious that the people who really care about the direction this country is heading care more about a great message than a well financed and organized campaign. That is why Ron Paul will do no worse than third in Iowa. Messages matter, and even though he has frontrunner type coffers right now, it's Dr. Paul's message of liberty, peace, and prosperity that is driving his campaign, and other candidates and the main stream media need to take note of this.

 

[piotr1]

blimp

 

[Adamsa]

It all depends on who is the most "Christianie" apparently.

 

[Paulbot_9876]

hey,cafferty has a book.....going to have to order it here next week....it sucks being poor and pay bills....lol

 

[Paulbot_9876]

john mccain... wtf.....lol commedy central on a new channel now??????

 

[JS4Pat]

Mine:

Hopefully it says that many people are beginning to care more about where this country is heading than they are a pretty face, a nice haircut, slick commercials and a well financed campaign. And If that is truly the case, then we are looking at a President Ron Paul next year!

 

[fj45lvr]

It says were not all as stupid as they hope we are.

 

[SonicInfinity]

"...so does Ron Paul."

Yay, Ron Paul!

 

[Starwind]

On the Republican side, everyone will be forced to drop out after Ron Paul top 3's Iowa, top 2's Wyoming, and then wins New Hampshire. They will finally realize that we the people want our country back and that nothing can stop Ron Paul.

 

[piotr1]

blimp