BREAKING: Twitter Trail Confirms "China Jon" Video as False Flag, Points to Huntsman Camp

[humanic]

Unfortunately the research has a pro-Paul bent and I'm 100% certain the people who actually believe that was a real Paul supporter will not budge an inch because of this.

You couldn't have even read these reports in that amount of time. Here is a quote from the second one explaining how the "fire" got started...

So, beginning at 11:14am that morning (Jan 5), several more tweets were sent out by “NHLiberty4Paul” with a link to the video. However, this time the tweets were sent to specific individuals (or “@” specific individuals, in Twitter-speak). Analysis of who was on this “shortlist” to receive the “China Jon” video is extremely revealing. In short, it was primarily outspoken and influential bloggers, journalists, and pundits with a history one or more of the following:

1) Praising Jon Huntsman
2) Promoting previous Jon Huntsman attack videos (especially against Paul)
3) Promoting Jon2012Girls
4) Expressing a strong dislike or hatred for Ron Paul
5) Promoting previous attacks and smears on Ron Paul (especially the “racist newsletters” one that the Huntsman had “piled on” with the previous week)

This time around, “NHLiberty4Paul’s” tweets were more than sufficient as “kindling”, and the fire of the false flag was quickly ignited

This is meticulously documented in the first article, with tons of sources, links, and screen shots. It's not a matter of opinion or "bent". It's what the record clearly shows happened.

 

[RM918]

You couldn't have even read these reports in that amount of time. Here is a quote from the second one explaining how the "fire" got started...

This is meticulously documented in the first article, with tons of sources, links, and screen shots. It's not a matter of opinion or "bent". It's what the record clearly shows happened.

It's been a half-hour between my post and when the thread was started. I read the first link, and that contains quite the bent. That doesn't matter to me, of course, I'm certainly convinced - but I'm just saying that any evidence, no matter how convincing or painstakingly researched, will likely be dismissed by the folks who were pushing this if it's presented by someone with a sympathetic view to our side. They'd probably do it anyway, but I'm just pointing out how they'll probably react.

 

[PierzStyx]

As a Latter-day Saint, this just makes me ashamed of Jon Huntsman. This is the exact opposite of "being honest in your dealings with your fellow man."

 

[Danke]

Are those his daughters? I may have to switch camps...momentarily

You have a mission, now get on it!

 

[camp_steveo]

Drudged

 

[Varin]

It´s not proof that it came from the Huntsman campaign. Most likely some random Paul hater, Huntsman was just opportunistic.

 

[humanic]

It´s not proof that it came from the Huntsman campaign. Most likely some random Paul hater, Huntsman was just opportunistic.

I don't agree that it was a "random Paul hater".

A "random Paul hater" could not make Huntsman personally open his mouth and foreshadow something "surprising" that his daughters will "release" "in the next few days", which will be sent to him via "a tweet".

A "random Paul hater" could not make Huntsman's daughters send a tweet that matches this description to the T less than 24 hours later, blaming Ron Paul for the video.

A "random Paul hater" would not have a catalogue of often obscure bloggers, journalists, etc with a history of promoting Huntsman and the "Jon2012Girls" (his daughters).

A "random Paul hater" would likely not know about the #fitn tag that was used.

A "random Paul hater" cannot make Huntsman himself choose a woman out of a large crowd of people who just so happens to ask him multiple incredibly softball questions, including one about the video, in front of tons of journalists, TV cameras, etc, thereby launching an extremely coordinated and fierce news blitz on the matter that could never have happened otherwise.

Etc.

(Outlined/documented in this one: http://www.theendrun.com/the-china-jon-huntsman-fraud-deconstructed)

 

[Kluge]

It´s not proof that it came from the Huntsman campaign. Most likely some random Paul hater, Huntsman was just opportunistic.

Maybe not 100%, but I think the circumstantial evidence as outlined (so far as I've read) is pretty damning that the Huntsman girls did it. Privileged little twits that don't have to be concerned with losing their rights like the rest of us are. Did Huntsman know what his daughters were allegedly up to? Now that part is tougher to prove circumstantially...but I'm leaning toward "he's not above such a thing."

 

[coffeewithchess]

The fact the media reported on this as they did, is all the proof I need that it wasn't from RP. The media did no investigative work (as usual), and out of the MILLIONS of YouTube videos, this one somehow gets picked up/reported on for days?
This ONE video gets asked about, instead of asking Huntsman about his NDAA support, TARP, and individual mandate support?

Right...let's report on a non-issue, to once again smear a candidate and his followers.

 

[AhuwaleKaNaneHuna]

Maybe not 100%, but I think the circumstantial evidence as outlined (so far as I've read) is pretty damning that the Huntsman girls did it. Privileged little twits that don't have to be concerned with losing their rights like the rest of us are. Did Huntsman know what his daughters were allegedly up to? Now that part is tougher to prove circumstantially...but I'm leaning toward "he's not above such a thing."

Of course he knew. He told everyone on Piers that his daughters were going to release a payback in the next few days, after that iowa tweet joke from Paul.

Nice how he withdrew from the race, 3 hours after the law suit was filed. He knew where it would lead.

 

[mello]

I thought there were federal laws on the books about these dirty tricks in campaigns?

 

[affa]

Just finished reading both articles.

AMAZING work. True journalism. The Twitter trail alone is absolutely damning, and the rest is icing on the cake.

Drudged.

 

[centure7]

I don't agree that it was a "random Paul hater".

A "random Paul hater" could not make Huntsman personally open his mouth and foreshadow something "surprising" that his daughters will "release" "in the next few days", which will be sent to him via "a tweet".

A "random Paul hater" could not make Huntsman's daughters send a tweet that matches this description to the T less than 24 hours later, blaming Ron Paul for the video.

A "random Paul hater" would not have a catalogue of often obscure bloggers, journalists, etc with a history of promoting Huntsman and the "Jon2012Girls" (his daughters).

A "random Paul hater" would likely not know about the #fitn tag that was used.

A "random Paul hater" cannot make Huntsman himself choose a woman out of a large crowd of people who just so happens to ask him multiple incredibly softball questions, including one about the video, in front of tons of journalists, TV cameras, etc, thereby launching an extremely coordinated and fierce news blitz on the matter that could never have happened otherwise.

Etc.

(Outlined/documented in this one: http://www.theendrun.com/the-china-jon-huntsman-fraud-deconstructed)

Agreed. In light of the new evidence, there is a >95% chance it was a Huntsman supporter, and there is at least a 1 in 3 chance it was the Huntsman daughters.

 

[jdmyprez_deo_vindice]

No surprise at all... You can bet the MSM will totally ignore it.

 

[ericthethe]

. . .and there is at least a 1 in 3 chance it was the Huntsman daughters.

I don't think you're doing the math correctly...

 

[tom7126]

All those words and not a single IP address. No proof. Next time just draw a ragecomic.

 

[wgadget]

Bump for interesting story!

 

[wgadget]

Has this been Drudged yet?

 

[speciallyblend]

the media will do it's best to bury it as they are ron paul.

 

[musicmax]

I thought there were federal laws on the books about these dirty tricks in campaigns?

I'm sure Eric Holder will drop his Mexico-bound AR15's and get right on it.