BREAKING NEWS: ronpaul.com Domain Name Battle update

[Brian4Liberty]

"Courtside Entertainment Group announced today that former Congressman and Presidential Candidate Ron Paul will make his national radio and podcast debut March 18, 2013. Ron Paul’s America will feature one of America’s most popular public figures sharing his thoughts and opinions on the issues listeners care about in twice daily one-minute radio commentaries with radio veteran and bestselling author Charles Goyette as his sidekick. In addition to the daily commentaries, Ron Paul’s America will also be available as a weekly podcast to satisfy the growing demand for on-demand digital content."

The domain name "ronpaulsamerica.com" is already registered, and has been since 04-Jan-08. No functioning website. Does it belong to Ron Paul now?

 

[CaptLouAlbano]

The domain name "ronpaulsamerica.com" is already registered, and has been since 04-Jan-08. No functioning website. Does it belong to Ron Paul now?

It doesn't look like it:

Registered through: GoDaddy.com, LLC (http://www.godaddy.com)
Domain Name: RONPAULSAMERICA.COM
Created on: 04-Jan-08
Expires on: 04-Jan-14
Last Updated on: 13-Sep-12

Registrant:
Karen Bergeron
276 Roby Dr
Erin, Tennessee 37061
United States

Administrative Contact:
Bergeron, Karen altnature@gmail. com
276 Roby Dr
Erin, Tennessee 37061
United States
(931) 289-1909

Technical Contact:
Bergeron, Karen altnature@ gmail.com
276 Roby Dr
Erin, Tennessee 37061
United States
(931) 289-1909

Domain servers in listed order:
PDNS01.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
PDNS02.DOMAINCONTROL.COM


Registry Status: clientDeleteProhibited
Registry Status: clientRenewProhibited
Registry Status: clientTransferProhibited
Registry Status: clientUpdateProhibited

 

[Brian4Liberty]

It doesn't look like it:

What if he wants it?

 

[MisfitToy]

It's not a moot point in the context of what Ron Paul has warned us about tho. If Ron Paul has his way, and the UN is kicked out of New York, WIPO goes with it. BUT not until Ron Paul gets to use their "services" to help him "win" something that he couldn't "earn" on his own (or with help from anyone including his closest advisers and most ardent dogmatic supporters). You claim I am a hypocrite when all I have done is state facts. I am clear about when what I am stating is not facts and my opinion is informed by facts. When the facts do not support my opinion, I abandon that opinion and admit I was wrong. How does this make me a hypocrite?

Who's the frustrated one now? LOL You are a hypocrite because you can dish it out but can't take it. I'm doing nothing you didn't do to me and yet you cry foul when it's done back at you lmao! Yes you make me happy like a clown and you can hurt my character all you want if it makes you feel happy, it doesn't bother me at all.
You can squirt out all the truth you want about domains, I don't know a thing about it, but I'm just here arguing your assumptions about Ron Paul's character. You are a spinner. For instance, you continually bring up the point that you have issue with Ron Paul because he didn't make an offer like a free market advocate should yet you are aware he had intentions to buy the domain. You acknowledge that fact here:

Firstly, when someone inquires about purchasing the thing you own...

We don't know what conspired beyond this aside from what was presented in the complaint but it doesn't stop you from posting your absolute plot to everything going on here.

No, you said that. I was talking about the agenda of one world government, which the US is a part of including and especially ICANN. You are purposefully confounding my words in an attempt to discredit me. This is dishonest on your part. You act this way because you can't even fathom the idea that Ron Paul may be wrong. That is just sad to me. AND YOU STILL CAN'T ACCEPT HE HAD A CHOICE! After all that is the whole point for you to twist my words and pretend to be confused about my very clear remarks and evidence contrary to what you assert. I stand by the fact that I have stood by since I learned of it. He had a choice, regardless of how you want to twist my word, the fact remains.

Again, you would go to such great lengths to twist my words. WIPO and UN are connected by more than just the global government agenda. I mentioned ICANN because if folks would stop trying to defend an obvious lie that came from Ron Paul's inner circle (and had that innner circle not lied in the first place), we could focus on the much more important issue of throwing off the yoke of global governance when it comes to registering domain names. But you won't even allow that discussion to have a place in your brain because you are too busy twisting and turning and weaving your tales about why the truth I espouse is not the truth.

We already know you suck at analogies from your previous Capital One arbitration blather. But now it becomes even more clear how your mind is making connections between two things that aren't related in the context presented. ICANN is part of the UN global governance agenda. This in no way implies that Ron Paul did not have a choice between a UN charter agency and a private corporation. Had Ron Paul chosen the private corporation, he would have been acting the same way someone would act in a dispute where the UN AND their agenda do not exist. The mere act of choosing to utilize a UN Charter Agency over a private entity (no matter how benign people want to paint it) is an acknowledgement of legitimacy of that institution. And out comes all the people saying "but you use roads! you use currency!", yeah? So what? I don't do it when I HAVE A CHOICE in the matter!

It really wasn't a great length, I was just having fun with you. It's called sarcasm. I never said he didn't have a choice (that was some other Ron Paul cliff-diving supporter,) I keep trying to tell you what difference does it make? The rules are ICANN rules, WIPO is following ICANN rules. So then you proclaim that ICANN is a UN/NWO agenda, which you reiterate in this post, so that makes your whole stink about the UN completely moot. If ICANN is a UN/NWO agenda then how can anyone avoid it if all paths lead back to it? You're making it seem like he has no choice anyway so as I ask again, what difference does it make?
It's why I asked in another thread if Ron Paul went to a bank to get change for a twenty, would you jump on him and shout that he's a hypocrite for supporting the Federal Reserve?

Your question is invalid. Firstly, when someone inquires about purchasing the thing you own, there is no bribe. Secondly bait and switch occurs when someone puts out a very tantalizing offer to sell something and then when the buyer shows up to buy that thing, the seller offers something else.

You're crafting the plot again here. It had nothing to do with his inquiry to which their answer was $848k.

In their letter that you link to numerous times, they clearly state they don't want to give up RP.com so they'll give him RP.org for free so he won't pursue RP.com. Then they say if he really does want to pursue RP.com, they'll sell it for $250k and throw in RP.org for free. That's what I was inquiring about.

Sorry to see you run away from this circus but don't think I'm not tired of beating this dead horse too.

Regards.

 

[Barrex]

Good video:

 

[robskicks]

i got ronpwn.com...

 

[CPUd]

Good video:

Some here will have a problem with him saying WIPO arbitration was the only choice.

 

[newbitech]

Digging up more info on this.

Not really "breaking" but it is news that has yet to be presented. Take from it what you will. I suspect this would part of the defense anyways.

http://sqswans.weebly.com/1/post/2013/02/130218_wipo-rp1.html

 

[newbitech]

Also, ronpaul.org no longer redirects to RonPaul.com.

Looks like they have mirrored the content from the .com to the .org.

All that is left now for a very amicable transfer is to set up URL redirects on the .com site to the .org site. This will pass the juice to the .org.

the .com site will more than likely take a traffic hit, but the .org should bounce up with the current content.

I am guessing this is gonna be resolved without an arbitration decision at this point. We'll probably never know the price.

 

[sailingaway]

Also, ronpaul.org no longer redirects to RonPaul.com.

Looks like they have mirrored the content from the .com to the .org.

All that is left now for a very amicable transfer is to set up URL redirects on the .com site to the .org site. This will pass the juice to the .org.

the .com site will more than likely take a traffic hit, but the .org should bounce up with the current content.

I am guessing this is gonna be resolved without an arbitration decision at this point. .

excellent.

 

[CaptLouAlbano]

Also, ronpaul.org no longer redirects to RonPaul.com.

Looks like they have mirrored the content from the .com to the .org.

All that is left now for a very amicable transfer is to set up URL redirects on the .com site to the .org site. This will pass the juice to the .org.

the .com site will more than likely take a traffic hit, but the .org should bounce up with the current content.

I am guessing this is gonna be resolved without an arbitration decision at this point. We'll probably never know the price.

Looks like a frame mirror when you pull the source code.

 

[PatriotOne]

Registration data has changed for .org site. Not sure what it means.

http://www.domainwhoisinfo.com/ronpaul.org

Domain Whois - RONPAUL.ORG - Summary

Domain Name: RONPAUL.ORG

Registration Status: Unknown

Registrar


Registrar:

Public Interest Registry

Whois Server:

org.whois-servers.net

Referral URL:

http://www.pir.org/

Server Information

IP:

216.104.165.29

Country:

United States

City:

Poway

Visit Website:

http://www.ronpaul.org

Domain Whois Details (Full)

WHOIS LIMIT EXCEEDED - SEE WWW.PIR.ORG/WHOIS FOR DETAILS

 

[sailingaway]

The only Poway I know is near San Diego. That doesn't mean it is the only one, of course.

 

[Ender]

The only Poway I know is near San Diego. That doesn't mean it is the only one, of course.

That's also the only Poway I can find.

 

[sailingaway]

I think there is a dot com hub there. It may be someone managing it for ...... Ron? I do hope a settlement is being worked out.

 

[CPUd]

It hasn't been moved, just modified. Their host is the same company as their registrar, and it's either a low-budget hosting plan, or an enhanced parking service that lets them host a few files.

It is using this service:

URL forwarding / FrameForwarding

URL and Frame Forwarding help maintain a professional image by forwarding to outside destinations with your domain name. No longer include lengthy web addresses with files names that are difficult to remember—allow your users to type in your domain name to view your website in no time!

URL Forwarding

In short, when a user types in one domain name for a web site and is then redirected to another website. In the browser window, the destination address is displayed.

User types in: http://www.mydomainname.com which has a URL Forward to http://www.yourwebhost.com/filename/file.htm but within the web browser, the destination address is displayed.

Frame Forwarding

When someone types in "http://yourdomain.com" they will be forwarded to an outside destination URL of your choice but they will still see the domain name in the browser window. We also allow the usage of description, keywords, and title, which are important to include with in the event a search engine "spider" or "bot" comes to the site; it will recognize the categories to help it determine what the site is for.

https://www.tierra.net/products/domains/features

 

[newbitech]

what's changed? WHOIS LIMIT EXCEEDED - SEE WWW.PIR.ORG/WHOIS FOR DETAILS

PatriotOne posted an incomplete DNS. from his website. Looks like that site has a limit on how many times a domain can be hit each day. Probably to block spam.

the webhost can be some server rack just about anywhere. and the pir.org is registry for all .orgs.

 

[CPUd]

what's changed? WHOIS LIMIT EXCEEDED - SEE WWW.PIR.ORG/WHOIS FOR DETAILS

PatriotOne posted an incomplete DNS. from his website. Looks like that site has a limit on how many times a domain can be hit each day. Probably to block spam.

the webhost can be some server rack just about anywhere. and the pir.org is registry for all .orgs.

Everything I have searched has the same info since 2-08-2013

 

[PatriotOne]

what's changed? WHOIS LIMIT EXCEEDED - SEE WWW.PIR.ORG/WHOIS FOR DETAILS

PatriotOne posted an incomplete DNS. from his website. Looks like that site has a limit on how many times a domain can be hit each day. Probably to block spam.

the webhost can be some server rack just about anywhere. and the pir.org is registry for all .orgs.

I was wondering what that meant. We've been blocked?

I just remembered it use to be registered to Martha Roberts of DN Capital and saw that was different. So no change...just blocked?

 

[CPUd]

I was wondering what that meant. We've been blocked?

I just remembered it use to be registered to Martha Roberts of DN Capital and saw that was different. So no change...just blocked?

The service you are using to do the lookup is blocked. This is the original reason for whois privacy- automated tools harvest people's contact info. Some services will still let people use their APIs, but restrict the number of lookups that can be done on it to keep people from whois'ing the entire internet.