Texan4Life
Member
- Joined
- May 12, 2007
- Messages
- 1,708
I'm sorry but a couple of weeks ago we were praising PPP's accuracy and cheering for the 24% now we are making excuses.
so true
I'm sorry but a couple of weeks ago we were praising PPP's accuracy and cheering for the 24% now we are making excuses.
if this Beck-Medina interview is going to derail her campaign we should make Glenn feel the heat for kicking the revolution in the groin... for the second time...
I understand Beck's ratings DID already take a hit, going down 16% last week as a result of his hatchet job on Medina. What the PPP poll may be hinting is there's been a break in the vote from Hutchison to Perry, putting him in a position to win without a runoff, whether Medina edges out Hutch or not. Perhaps it is HUTCH who is fading, not Debra.
Hutchinson's strength as a candidate is what has made this competitive to this point---as above stated, Medina did not have the money or base to be any higher than 10% in a traditional race. Maybe we should count the outing of the traitor/Judas Goat Beck (now plain for all to see) as the victory in this episode, and local supporters should analyze the primary results to note which GOP leaning districts she does best in. Find an open Republican seat situation in one of those areas, and after she moves there run her for that office.
Texas governor's race not turning out as expected
http://www.star-telegram.com/politics/story/1984304-p2.html
It's not the media, it's the PPP. They're reliable. Though they cannot predict the future; Medina clearly has "faded" over the last 10 days. But that doesn't mean she can't stage a comeback.
Are they polling Democrats and Independents because they are voting for Debra too.
Talking to poll workers Tuesday, when I voted, more Democrats are
asking for Republican ballots, as you can vote as either here in Texas
primaries. I'd also heard the same from others around the state, too.
What's going on here is Democrats know their likely Demo candidate
is gonna lose to whoever the Republicans put up and they really hate
Gov Perry. Anybody is better than 4 more years of www.slickrickperry.com.
Most of those democrats, IMO, will thus vote for Medina over KBH,
as KBH is vocally supported by the Bush's down here and Medina has
been rising in polls while KBH has been dropping, too. Bottom Line;
Either Perry or KBH mean more of the same entrenched establishment
Republican rule in Texas, and they will eagerly vote against that and
especially to tweak them with supporting a non-establishment outsider.
Some Demos will also dream that a Medina running against the Demo
candidate might somehow give them some little better hope of a win.
That Beck slammed Medina, and they really hate Beck a lot, too, also
encourages them to get behind and support Medina, too. Also, Beck is
still ranting on about Medina daily, looking more un-fair all the time.
We all may need to thank Beck for getting the Demo's behind her to
put her over the top in the Republican primary!! That'd be a hoot!!
- Shane
That's one thing I have noticed with this movement that irritates me - you're always making excuses when things aren't going your way, and you refuse to be consistent.
Here's the facts: The majority of the americans don't agree with you completely. You want to start a fight with them and call them all sorts of names, go ahead, but then "President Paul" will remain a dream forever and ever.
Look over at the Rand forum, and you'll see everyone mocking Johnson for poor showing. Johnson is EXACTLY where Medina was just two months ago. Do you want to bring a new climate to politics? Or do you want to be like that pig in "Animal farm", who started a revolution but then became an oppressor himself?
Think about it.
/John
Look over at the Rand forum, and you'll see everyone mocking Johnson for poor showing. Johnson is EXACTLY where Medina was just two months ago. Do you want to bring a new climate to politics? Or do you want to be like that pig in "Animal farm", who started a revolution but then became an oppressor himself?
Yeah it's also very disheartening to hear on the Rand forums how they want to prevent Bill Johnson from participating in the debates, you don't have to agree with the guy but I'm sure we all can see that the more candidates the better... for Freedom.
The best thing for freedom is to elect Rand Paul in that race. Yeah, I'd like to see bigger fields in these debates, but the benefit of getting Johnson booted from the debates outweighs the moral hazard, especially since it's likely that Johnson is still polling in the very low single digits.
That's what Fox said about Ron Paul..... Are we really becoming Fox?![]()
People can't say anything negative about a neocon bomb-thrower who spends all his time attacking Rand Paul and completely ignoring Grayson? It's funny that the guy is blowing through his life savings and polling 2% in every independent poll.
Why is it that 2% Johnson can be in the debates but Gurley Martin and John Stephenson cannot?
Anyway: get off your damn high-horse.