BLITZER'S BLOG: What to expect at a contested convention

Tyler_Durden

Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2011
Messages
2,983
hx x p://situationroom.blogs.cnn.com/2012/03/21/blitzers-blog-what-to-expect-at-a-contested-convention/

(CNN) – Mitt Romney may be in the driver’s seat right now, but there is still a chance he won’t be able to amass the 1,144 delegates needed to win the Republican presidential nomination before the party convention in Tampa at the end of August.

If he comes up short, there could be a contested convention. That means the delegates actually would have to vote on the convention floor for the nominee.

That has prompted many of us to take a closer look at the arcane party rules that would guide the voting.

Republican Party Rule No. 40 is intriguing. It could automatically eliminate Newt Gingrich and Ron Paul for any consideration at the convention.

For a candidate’s name to be considered, the rule says, that candidate must have won the plurality of delegates in at least five states. Here’s the rule’s exact language:

“Each candidate for nomination for President of the United States and Vice President of the United States shall demonstrate the support of a plurality of the delegates from each of five (5) or more states, severally, prior to the presentation of the name of that candidate for nomination.”

As you know, Ron Paul so far has not won a plurality of delegates in any state.

Newt Gingrich has won South Carolina and Georgia, but he’s still three states shy of meeting the convention requirement.

Mitt Romney and Rick Santorum have more than met the requirement.

We are going through the other rules to see what other surprises might be in store if no one gets to the magic number in advance. Stay tuned.


Edit: Looks like it's the latest MSM Meme:

GOP rule could sink Gingrich, Paul hopes to win at contested Republican convention
hxx p://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57401636-503544/gop-rule-could-sink-gingrich-paul-hopes-to-win-at-contested-republican-convention/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+cbsnews%2Ffeed+%28CBSNews.com%29

"Newt Gingrich and Ron Paul's slim hopes of winning the Republican presidential nomination depend primarily on their ability to triumph at a contested convention in August. The idea is that if front-runner Mitt Romney falls short of the 1,144 delegates he needs to secure the nomination outright before the convention, his rivals will seize the opportunity to win over the Republican faithful during the convention process.

That long-shot strategy depends on Gingrich and Paul actually getting on the convention ballot. And it now appears that may be a problem. The Atlanta-Journal Constitution has noticed a little-known rule - No. 40(b), to be exact - that would seem to keep the two candidates from being able to participate in a floor fight.*

The rule was adopted in 2008, and here's what it says: "Each candidate for nomination for President of the United States and Vice President of the United States shall demonstrate the support of a plurality of the delegates from each of five (5) or more states, severally, prior to the presentation of the name of that candidate for nomination."

Gingrich has won a plurality in two states so far, South Carolina and Georgia; Paul has not won any states. The Republican National Convention confirms to CBS News that this means a candidate would not qualify for the first ballot at the convention unless they get, as the rule states, a plurality of delegates in five states.

On MSNBC's "The Daily Rundown" Wednesday morning, RNC Chairman Reince Preibus said the rule is "important."

"So when these candidates are adding up their delegates or when people out there have a particular issue that they would like to move at the convention, they had better make sure they at least have a plurality of five states to make these things happen," he said.

The Gingrich camp did not immediately respond to questions about how the rule affects their strategies. Paul campaign chairman Jesse Benton said he anticipated meeting the five-state threshold, saying in an email that "we are well positioned to carry WA, MN, AK, ND and ME among several others."

It's possible that even if Gingrich or Paul's delegates can't vote for their candidate on the first ballot, they could do so on subsequent ballots if Gingrich and/or Paul garners the support of a plurality of delegates from at least five states during the fight on the convention floor. Under Republican National Committee rules, Gingrich or Paul would need to be formally nominated after the first ballot for this to happen, and demonstrate their support in five states when this happens. It's an extremely unlikely scenario, though technically possible.

A related question: What happens to bound delegates if their candidate doesn't appear on the ballot? CBS News has contacted the four state Republican parties to explain what would happen to Gingrich and Paul's bound delegates if the candidates are not on the ballot; thus far only Mississippi Republican party has responded.

"hould Gingrich not be on the first ballot, his delegates would be released in the same way that they would if he suspended his campaign," Communications Director Brett Kittredge said in an email."
 
Last edited:
Does that only apply to the first ballot? If not...then why do we keep hearing about Jeb Bush and Palin stepping and getting the nomination?
 
Eh, more MSM spin. He doesn't note the fact that many states that CNN has declared "won" are STILL CAUCUSING.

It's alright, we just keep fighting the good fight and let them bury their heads in the sand and tell the indoctrinated mass what they will. We're not going to be able to change any minds through that medium anyway (currently).
 
How long before we find out that Ron wins Maine, Nevada, Colorado, Iowa, Washington, Alaska, and Michigan? These 7 states should definitely pull in a plurality(win) in delegates for Paul. How long before the media has to flat-out admit this as fact? I'm ready to see some serious talk on this issue and they have to know that Paul is going to win those states.
 
Last edited:
How long before we find out that Ron wins Maine, Nevada, Colorado, Iowa, Washington, Alaska, and Michigan? These 7 states should definitely pull in a plurality(win) in delegates for Paul. How long before the media has to flat-out admit this as fact? I'm ready to see some serious talk on this issue and they have to know that Paul is going to win those states.

my guess is that they WILL NEVER admit it!!!!!! The last thing the msm wants to do is create any type of momentum for Ron at all!!!!! We all know Ron is wayyyyyy to much of a threat to the establishment who believes that they OWN our country!!
 
There's a REASON the talking radio heads are afraid of a brokered convention and its name is RON PAUL.

They don't have a CLUE who has the unbound delegates in the caucus states, but chances are more of them belong to our guy than they want to let on.
 
my guess is that they WILL NEVER admit it!!!!!! The last thing the msm wants to do is create any type of momentum for Ron at all!!!!! We all know Ron is wayyyyyy to much of a threat to the establishment who believes that they OWN our country!!

I've heard them start to sound fearful of a brokered convention already, so they MUST know. Question is, will they bring up the topic, because if they do, they will have to talk about Ron Paul. Interestingly, I saw an article somewhere about this very topic as it concerns the Grinch, but not Ron...heh. Maybe THAT'S why Grinch is staying in: so they can discuss a brokered convention without talking about Ron.
 
How long before we find out that Ron wins Maine, Nevada, Colorado, Iowa, Washington, Alaska, and Michigan? These 7 states should definitely pull in a plurality(win) in delegates for Paul. How long before the media has to flat-out admit this as fact? I'm ready to see some serious talk on this issue and they have to know that Paul is going to win those states.

I updated the opening thread with the broken CBS article that says this:

"Paul campaign chairman Jesse Benton said he anticipated meeting the five-state threshold, saying in an email that "we are well positioned to carry WA, MN, AK, ND and ME among several others."
 
Expect a massive wave of disinformation regarding the truth of GOP rules and Brokered Conventions, especially after Ron Paul's Jay Leno interview last night.
 
my guess is that they WILL NEVER admit it!!!!!! The last thing the msm wants to do is create any type of momentum for Ron at all!!!!! We all know Ron is wayyyyyy to much of a threat to the establishment who believes that they OWN our country!!

I think you're half right...

I think they'll admit it when they can truly paint us as thieves of the election.
 
I think you're half right...

I think they'll admit it when they can truly paint us as thieves of the election.

And then Ron can play the Abraham Lincoln card. Lincoln was the first Republican president and he won in a brokered convention with an almost identical strategy to that of Ron.
 
That is a good question: When will we know the status of the delegates of Iowa, Maine, etc?
 
It is a little harder for them since Santorum and Grinch have come out saying they are using the same plan.

Which plan is that? The one where you have true grassroots supporters show up to caucuses and delegate selections around the country, follow the rules and take the majority if not all the delegates? Or the one where party insides disregard their own rules, appoint their own chairmen, ignore votes and points of order, have people arrested, and close down the caucus when things don't go their way?
 
Blitzer was born without a backbone and without a brain. Reading his blogs takes you back to third grade reading levels. It's stunning how people like him.
 
I think they'll admit it when they can truly paint us as thieves of the election.

So they're going to claim that the Ron Paul campaign has been "quietly stealing delegates under the radar" when both official campaign reps (like Doug Wead) and Paul supporters have been SCREAMING at the MSM to cover the fact that we're the true delegate winner in many states for MONTHS and the MSM has done everything it can to avoid any discussion of that?

Good luck with that.
 
Back
Top