Bill Kristol: 'We Beat Back Ron Paul and Rand Paul'

That's correct.

To own a thing means to have the exclusive right to use it: not to control its market price.

A right to control the market price of something one owns equates to a right to force others to pay one more than they want for it.



I suggest you locate some introductory readings in libertarian thought.



If 99% of Americans already do that, what difference does it make?



HOW DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND THAT PEOPLE OTHER THAN IMMIGRANTS COMMIT CRIMES?

SHOW ME THAT MEMORIAL YOU TWIT.

This is very deep autism.

If 99% of Americans already do that, what difference does it make?

Why make it 100% then? Why add more enemy voters? You NEVER answer this question. Because it proves you to be a reality detached ideologue.

HOW DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND THAT PEOPLE OTHER THAN IMMIGRANTS COMMIT CRIMES?

SHOW ME THAT MEMORIAL YOU TWIT.

Every immigrant crime is preventable. But its ok because why keep out criminals when we have too few here, right?

I get it you have no answers, no ideas, just talking points and that about it.
 
This is very deep autism.

I see you've imbibed deeply of alt-right slogans.

Why make it 100% then? Why add more enemy voters? You NEVER answer this question.

I've answered it many times, you just don't like the answer.

Foreigners aren't enemy voters any more than Americans are.

More or less foreigners won't change the outcome of elections in a meaningful way.

Liberty will be neither helped nor harmed.

It makes no difference.

Every immigrant crime is preventable.

Every crime is preventable; just shoot everyone into space.

No people, no crime.

Good plan?
 
I see you've imbibed deeply of alt-right slogans.



I've answered it many times, you just don't like the answer.

Foreigners aren't enemy voters any more than Americans are.

More or less foreigners won't change the outcome of elections in a meaningful way.

Liberty will be neither helped nor harmed.

It makes no difference.



Every crime is preventable; just shoot everyone into space.

No people, no crime.

Good plan?


Yes it will and has, have you seen the demographics of the state of CA over the last 50 years? That alone proves you to be a hack.

https://cis.org/Remaking-Political-...Legal-Immigration-Congressional-Apportionment

Liberty is clearly harmed when you imported welfare voters or terrorists, remember how we got the Patriot Act? What reason was it rammed throughed the Congress? What event caused that again? Oh that is right 6th Generation Native Mormons decided to house a fund raiser, right?



Do nothing because muh feels, great plan, I guess that is why you guys win so many elections...LOL.
 
Nope, but to blame 9/11 on immigration is severely retarded.

Its not. If we did not allow them in they would not have been in such a position to attack us in such a way. But hey please tell us the benefit of mass immigration. How does higher tax burdens, more crime, more terrorism, more welfare voters, higher costs of living, lower standards of living are a net gain.
 
Its not. If we did not allow them in they would not have been in such a position to attack us in such a way. But hey please tell us the benefit of mass immigration. How does higher tax burdens, more crime, more terrorism, more welfare voters, higher costs of living, lower standards of living are a net gain.
Please tell us the benefits of a police state, keep us safe, muh wall.
 
Please tell us the benefits of a police state, keep us safe, muh wall.

Holy God you guys are autistic. IF WE DO NOT ALLOW IN TERRORISTS AND THE CULTURES/GROUPS THAT PRODUCE THEM, WE WOULD NOT HAVE A POLICE STATE, NOR THE NEED, NOR THE SUPPORT FOR ONE, MY GOD ARE YOU THIS DUMB.
 
He is also good friends with John "The Mother $#@!*ing NEOCON" Bolton who said this after listening to his foreign policy speech.

'Strong,' 'Impressive,' 'On Target'

You mean the foreign policy speech that Thomas Massie likedtoo? That one? Too bad Trump isn't following it. :(
 
Holy God you guys are autistic. IF WE DO NOT ALLOW IN TERRORISTS AND THE CULTURES/GROUPS THAT PRODUCE THEM, WE WOULD NOT HAVE A POLICE STATE, NOR THE NEED, NOR THE SUPPORT FOR ONE, MY GOD ARE YOU THIS DUMB.

Nah, some here are pushing the same globalist meme that Ron Paul worked against his entire life. At least one of them preaches world government. Can't understand why he's still allowed to post here. I guess Bryan doesn't give a damn anymore.
 
Holy God you guys are autistic. IF WE DO NOT ALLOW IN TERRORISTS AND THE CULTURES/GROUPS THAT PRODUCE THEM, WE WOULD NOT HAVE A POLICE STATE, NOR THE NEED, NOR THE SUPPORT FOR ONE, MY GOD ARE YOU THIS DUMB.

Maybe we should stop creating terrorists. :rolleyes:

And maybe you ought to read a little Ron Paul.

The real problem is that both Washington and London are more interested in regime change overseas than any blowback that might come to the rest of us back home. They just do not care about the price we pay for their foreign policy actions. No grand announcement of new resolve to “fight terrorism” can be successful unless we understand what really causes terrorism. They do not hate us because we are rich and free. They hate us because we are over there, bombing them.

Full article:
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2017/05/ron-paul/us-exceptional-terrorist-nation/
 
Nah, some here are pushing the same globalist meme that Ron Paul worked against his entire life. At least one of them preaches world government. Can't understand why he's still allowed to post here. I guess Bryan doesn't give a damn anymore.

You know that was never said- it's your one-pony trick that you constantly repeat.

Ron Paul also said he would not vote for Trump- you did and you supported Trump on this forum. Not very Ron Paul supportive IMHPOV.

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/274811-ron-paul-i-will-not-vote-for-trump

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showth...l-On-The-2016-Presidential-Field-(MSNBC-10-3)
 
neo-cons and conservatives are contradictions in terms. neo-cons are not by any stretch conservative.

....get real......neo-cons are 'new conservatives' and like bosses the new ones tend to be the same as the old ones...they vary in puny ways only a trifling radio republican would/could get worked up about...'the new conservatives' i hear discussed are LARGELY supporters of the stinking republican party inc. just like the stinking 'old conservatives'...they are both LARGELY interventionists/warmongers...they are both absolute monetary ignoramuses who can't/won't discuss the fractional reserve deposit creation abomination which is used by some private [?foreign] secret-squirrel banksters to enslave the rest of u$...etc. ad nau$eam...they both really really suck...really...:mad:

...as to the most important issue$ there isn't a dime$ difference...that's why 'they' are allowed on $tage...giving the appearance of 'earnest, important debate' here in 'murka...it's part of the 'circus' in the age-old 'circuses and bread' ruse..
 
Last edited:
Nah, some here are pushing the same globalist meme that Ron Paul worked against his entire life. At least one of them preaches world
government. Can't understand why he's still allowed to post here. I guess Bryan doesn't give a damn anymore.


Clearly. But at least the wave of nationalism is wash the Neo Con sum out of the GOP.
 
Back
Top