BI: "Obnoxious Troll Asks Massachusetts Governor If Marathon Attack Was A 'False Flag'"

[RonPaulFanInGA]

BI: "Obnoxious Troll Asks Massachusetts Governor If Marathon Attack Was A 'False Flag'"

http://www.businessinsider.com/obno...or-if-marathon-attack-was-a-false-flag-2013-4

During a press conference intended to provide updates regarding the investigation into the bombing of the Boston Marathon, one individual present asked Massachusetts governor if the bombing was a "false flag" attack.

A false flag is a war term that refers to perpetrating an attack under the guise of the enemy for the purpose of making them look bad.

Senator Elizabeth Warren and Governor Deval Patrick were both in attendance.

"Why were people in the audience telling people to be calm moments before the bomb went off," the person asked, "Was this another false flag staged attack to take our civil liberties and promote Homeland Security by sticking their hands down our pants on the streets?"

"No," the Governor said, "Next question."

Video at the link. The person who asked the question was Dan Bidondi, who is a "correspondent" for InfoWars.

 

[Anti Federalist]

Why not "Brave Journalist" instead of "Obnoxious Troll"?

 

[CPUd]

Governor handled it the right way. Unlike Rumsfeld

 

[itshappening]

BI hates gold

BI hates alternative media

BI hates Ron Paul

BI loses $5 million a year

 

[The Goat]

Plenty of people have asked that question. Why shouldn't it be asked? Is our government trust worthy enough not to be asked that question? Is there no record of it doing them in the past?

 

[CPUd]

Plenty of people have asked that question. Why shouldn't it be asked? Is our government trust worthy enough not to be asked that question? Is there no record of it doing them in the past?

It wasn't the venue for rhetorical questions. Maybe in a few days, but this was too soon.

 

[tasteless]

Not sure what kind of answer he was expecting...

"Well I was hoping no one would ask, but yes, we were undertaking a conspiracy to kill and injure American citizens in order to drum up support to pass legislation that would further erode civil liberties... AND WE WOULD HAVE GOTTEN AWAY WITH IT IF IT WEREN'T FOR YOU MEDDLING KIDS AND THAT MUTT OF YOURS!"

 

[Thor]

Maybe in a few days, but this was too soon.

I disagree. While the spotlight was shining brightly and lots of people around the nation (and world) were focused in, it was the perfect time to ask. More exposure to the concept of false flags.

If this was, or was not, is yet to be determined and may never be determined. But it might have made more people who were watching say "What's a false flag?"

It just seems a little odd to me that we have all these recent shootings and then this. It sure makes it easier to sell the false sense of "safety and security" of the police state. Disarm and increase security everywhere, it is justified. And after some of the information revealed on OKC, whose to say what is real, and what is not.

From what I have read, there were lots of bomb sniffing dogs at the start and finish lines, and spotters on roofs (http://www.local15tv.com/news/local/story/UM-Coach-Bomb-Sniffing-Dogs-Spotters-on-Roofs/BrirjAzFPUKKN8z6eSDJEA.cspx).

My hunch.... they had a warning / tip / knowledge of something from someone (false flag / terrorist / lone wolf / whatever), tried to stop it, failed, and now deny they had any warning so they don't look incompetent.

 

[jmdrake]

Not sure what kind of answer he was expecting...

"Well I was hoping no one would ask, but yes, we were undertaking a conspiracy to kill and injure American citizens in order to drum up support to pass legislation that would further erode civil liberties... AND WE WOULD HAVE GOTTEN AWAY WITH IT IF IT WEREN'T FOR YOU MEDDLING KIDS AND THAT MUTT OF YOURS!"

^This. Sorry but the question was poorly framed and the "reporter" looked like an idiot. He should have asked "Can you respond to a report on local NBC affiliate channel 15 that the crowd was being told there was a bomb drill going on before the bomb went off?" Set the MSM against itself rather than setting yourself up.

 

[donnay]

Why not "Brave Journalist" instead of "Obnoxious Troll"?

He'll be labeled "Terrorist Journalist" before nightfall.

Dan Bidondi is a true liberty lover. So many people are worried about keeping up appearances. The hard questions have to be asked so it jolts people out of their slumber.

 

[silverhandorder]

Retarded question. He has no evidence but throws around accusations. Conspiracy nuts like this is the reason I don't pay attention to conspiracy cries every time something happens. Every bad event so far was a conspiracy theorists rallying cry.

 

[donnay]

Retarded question. He has no evidence but throws around accusations. Conspiracy nuts like this is the reason I don't pay attention to conspiracy cries every time something happens. Every bad event so far was a conspiracy theorists rallying cry.

That's because every bad event starts with a conspiracy.

 

[itshappening]

He'll be labeled "Terrorist Journalist" before nightfall.

Dan Bidondi is a true liberty lover. So many people are worried about keeping up appearances. The hard questions have to be asked so it jolts people out of their slumber.

+1. He's a patriot and i'm glad he was there.

Throw it in their faces.

 

[RonPaulFanInGA]

That's because every bad event starts with a conspiracy.

But not every event that receives widespread media coverage directly involves the government. That's the problem with InfoWars, they 'cry wolf' on everything. If there ever is a government plot, no one is going to take them seriously because that's what they always say.

Loughner was a false flag.
Holmes was a false flag.
Lanza was a false flag.

Because as we all know, it's not possible for a random nut with no direct government involvement to go on a killing spree.

 

[itshappening]

RPGA, is your only source Jay Carney, a government propaganda mouthpiece?

Are we not allowed to analyze events and ask questions like for example what a man in combat gear was doing in the woods outside Sandy Hook who was detained?

 

[RonPaulFanInGA]

RPGA, is your only source Jay Carney, a government propaganda mouthpiece?

Are we not allowed to analyze events and ask questions like for example what a man in combat gear was doing in the woods outside Sandy Hook who was detained?

Did Jay Carney even comment on Aurora?

Nice straw man there. Same game Jones plays: "believe me or you're with the Feds." Sounds a lot like Bush's "you're either with us or against us" line.

Get a source besides Alex Jones, InfoWars, Prison Planet, Natural News and random weirdos on YouTube.

 

[itshappening]

Alex is just the messenger... you seem obsessed!

If Alex didn't exist, we'd still be asking the same damn questions.

Why? Because we love liberty and truth.

It has nothing to do with Alex.

We distrust and hate the government which is compromised of known liars.

Gee, why would we suspect them?

Terrorist Plots, Hatched by the F.B.I.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/29/o...ped-along-by-the-fbi.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

Operation Gladio: Admitted bombings in Europe by CIA front groups
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Gladio

I could go on and on but will save you the embarrassment.

 

[MarkoH]

A reasonable question to the wrong person, but good it was given an airing.

Broadly speaking there are four possibilities for who was responsible for the atrocity: (1) A nutcase like Eric Robert Rudolph of the Centennial Olympic Park bombing, (2) elements within the government as with the first World Trade Center bombing in 1993 and the Oklahoma City bombing in 1995, (3) another group either Israeli or sympathetic to Israel that wants to keep the U.S. at war with the Middle East, (4) Muslims who hate Americans for supporting a government at war with them.

One of these is the butcher. You can be sure the government is itching to make it number 4, and they will omit the context and trash anyone who brings it up. On the Internet you can view as many photos of Mideast children turned into a bloody mess by U.S. bombs for as long as you can stand, mass butchery for absolutely nothing, but the Neocons will be screaming at the top of their lungs “they hate us ’cuz we’re free.”

In cases 2 through 4 it will be the U.S. government that is hateful.

 

[itshappening]

Did Jay Carney even comment on Aurora?

Nice straw man there. Same game Jones plays: "believe me or you're with the Feds." Sounds a lot like Bush's "you're either with us or against us" line.

Get a source besides Alex Jones, InfoWars, Prison Planet, Natural News and random weirdos on YouTube.

ugh, how about this?

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/29/o...ped-along-by-the-fbi.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

Yes, the same agency taking over the "investigation" of this latest bombing have a long history of setting up patsy's and terror plots.

It's in the damn New York Times.

 

[James Madison]

Smh at people defending this reporter without any solid evidence.

So, it's fine for us to cry wolf, but how is this any different than libs who jump at the chance to label any attack the work of 'right wing extremists'? What about neocons that cry 'Muslim'?