Exactly. The working theory I still think ties this all together, is that the Benghazi incident was part of a false flag that was originally planned to rebound in Obama's favor, that went deeply sideways. E.g., the diplomats were only supposed to be taken hostage, with the anti-Muslim film being cited as the reason. Then a follow-up 'heroic response' was to follow, by way of Barry ordering "the CIA and later the military to launch a rescue mission." The successful (staged) conclusion of the rescue story would eclipse any questions about blaming the film, just as the "we killed Osama" story killed widespread scrutiny over the photoshopped birth certificate he released days before the raid in spring 2011.
Only somebody goofed, or got over-eager, or straight out flipped the script and got the diplomats killed instead of captured. Barry was undecided whether to use the military for a reprisal, as now there would be no feel-good "he saved our people" campaign lift coming out of it. The hesitation allowed real questions about the whole event to roll out in the opposite direction that he intended. Did Bilderberg (or Mossad) and company quietly direct Hillary or the CIA et al to go lethal in Benghazi, behind Obarry's back, as part of it changing the script about his re-election, to instead install Romney as Puppet-in-chief? If so, the script change failed, as he got re-elected anyway, flap and all.
The Pauls seem to be committed to never talking bluntly about current false flag ops, so he will likely sidestep the issue during questioning.
