jmdrake
Member
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2007
- Messages
- 51,924
No one has ever "grabbed my dick" during a TSA search. Not once. I've had dozens of them. And even if it did happen, I wouldn't freak out or pretend to be outraged. It might just be my cynical view of things, but I'd expect nothing less silly from the State.
Sure. But it has happened. That's my point. You could take a 6 shooter, put one bullet in it, spin the chamber and click against your skull dozens of times without ever getting shot. That doesn't mean it doesn't happen. And whether you are freaked out or outraged by molestation doesn't mean that it's not.
That's a sort of satire I can get behind! I always call them that.
That's nice. And I always call pat downs that include people's genitals molestation. No difference.
Did you miss the part where I said a principled stance on civil liberties and privacy is welcomed? It seems you did, because you're really murdering this strawman you've created.
I missed where Ben Affleck took a principled stance on civil liberties.

Sure, I could have just said Joe Dumbass Moron for each. I guess I mean to say that Joe Republican is going to vote for Our Guy no matter what, and that Joe Average is going to move with whatever the current narrative may be.
Whatever. Joe "Average" Democrat is going with the "I must support Our Guy no matter what and stop complaining about the TSA because a Democrat is in power". Ben Affleck is being "Joe Average Dumbass Moron Democrat". Most people were angry at the TSA when the "rapescans" and "invasive pat downs" (molestation) came out, not because a democrat was in power, but because they instinctively knew this was wrong. Then people like Affleck decided "Oh it's not so bad. I support Obama and Obama supports this so it must be to keep us safe right?" argument. I run mostly in democratic circles. I saw the rage leave people once it truly sunk in that Obama, Whoopi Goldberg, Ben Affleck, fill-in-the-blank liberal statist supported the scanners and patdowns.
No, it isn't. I'm just not prone to hyperbole or over sensitivity. It is absolutely not molestation. It's annoying and it is a waste of time. It requires a presumption of guilt and can't possibly be considered Constitutional, but it absolutely is not molestation.
Just because you haven't been groped in your genitals and just because you personally don't mind being molested doesn't mean it's not molestation.
Sure, every time I opt-out, I'm reminded that Ohh Gee, this isn't that bad anymore -- we have backscatter machines that use sound or something that isn't radiation and your nuts won't be on display! That nonsense does nothing to address the civil liberties concerns.
Yep. And Affleck doesn't care about civil liberties. Ingram doesn't either. And let Romney be president and Affleck will find a reason to be against something else that isn't as bad as the TSA (since he's on record being okay with dick groping) and Ingram will defend the next thing Romney does that's worse.
I never said that. I said that privacy is non-existent in his life because the mass of Americans do not give a damn about other people's privacy. It's easy to see why he would be willing to call them on it.
