Battle of the Stupid: The Debates are On

And if both of them have already stipulated that they won't come if there's a third candidate on stage, then RFKJr can't any more meet the requirements than you can. No matter what happens.

Do you really think they didn't?

IF and WHEN RFK Jr. meets the requirements, and both of them decline to attend, it will be true.
Like when Carter refused to attend the first debate, and Anderson debated Reagan alone.

I'm only saying he has a lot of work to do before he meets the requirements. He can't expect to be admitted without that.
 
IF and WHEN RFK Jr. meets the requirements, and both of them decline to attend, it will be true.
Like when Carter refused to attend the first debate, and Anderson debated Reagan alone.

The League of Women Voters ran the debates back then. They actually had standards to maintain, and a good reputation to live up to. They therefore got squeezed out of the business before the twentieth century was even over.

If and when he meets the requirements. Are you asleep? What are the requirements to be on primary ballots in most states? You have to be Biden or Trump. We're talking about candidates not being able to get on Democratic primary ballots unless their name is Biden. That's literally the only requirement. And you think there's some kind of immutable gold standard past which nobody can keep you out of a debate?
 
When the people no longer feel the need or the desire to have debates, then we will be getting somewhere. Otherwise, it's just a dog and pony show, which only demonstrates your consent, that others have influence and power over you. They are meant to take away your individuality, the desire to work locally and within your community, and to transfer power and control as far away from you as they can.

What does any politician know that you need to hear in a "debate", that you [and the offspring that you raise] shouldn't know already?
 
I have suspicions on the expedited debates scheduling. Putting aside all Biden's demands for now, but of course those also are telling and unreasonable.

1) Democrats want enough time for the first debate (ahead of conventions for the first time ever) to be "forgotten", as it is so early, even before the apex of summer, that months will go by, this means they want it to go down the memory hole when Biden performs poorly.
2) The fact that one debate is before the DNC in August makes it more likely that Biden really IS the candidate, although there's still a chance he won't be, and still a chance Harris won't be VP.
3) This one's the biggest - lining up for enough time to make sure early voting can be rigged, as no more challenging appearances like having to answer questions, there will be mid-September to Election Day for Democrats to organize a big clandestine ballot operation.
4) October Surprise already planned. No debates all month (never seen this). Pandemic? Terrorism? War?
 
IMG_8936.jpeg
 


There already was a debate. It lasted 8 long years; 4 years Trump, 4 years Biden. I wonder what would happen if the majority of people stayed home and didn't vote at all. Business would go on as usual, but it just might them think twice and sweat a little, wondering where all their previous supporters went.

Or for those who can't fathom not voting, throw a check mark for RFK Jr.
 
Last edited:
There already was a debate. It lasted 8 long years; 4 years Trump, 4 years Biden. I wonder what would happen if the majority of people stayed home and didn't vote at all. Business would go on as usual, but it just might them think twice and sweat a little, wondering where all their previous supporters went.

Or for those who can't fathom not voting, throw a check mark for RFK Jr.

If these two clowns run on their records, this will be the entire debate:

"You did too."

"Well you started it."
 
Back
Top