barr is PRO-Interventionist Foreign Policy

[Knightskye]

Maybe I'm confused. So you are saying foreign interventionism IS
part of Ron Paul's Freedom Message? A simple "yes" or "no"
would do.

and increased efforts to quietly but actively build on the deep base of political understanding that already exists among a large segment of the Iranian population (and including the more than one million Iranian-Americans).

Dude. Dr. Paul wants to lift the embargo on Cuba. He wants to do that because he thinks trade will destroy the Communism there. Is that foreign interventionism?

 

[JosephTheLibertarian]

We've already determined that tones is an idiot and a barr groupie.
Lets see if you are the same.

Do you not see a problem with barr's interventionist foreign policy?
If don't, why not just support mcCain or Obama. Either will suit you
fine.

The only problem is I see is with your propaganda. Why don't you leave the LP alone? Why don't you just go away, vote for the theocrats in 08, noone cares about your drivel.

 

[Allen72289]

Barr is a neocon.


Baldwin '08

 

[JosephTheLibertarian]

Barr is a neocon.


Baldwin '08

Baldwin is a protectionist

Barr '08

 

[brandon]

Dude. Dr. Paul wants to lift the embargo on Cuba. He wants to do that because he thinks trade will destroy the Communism there. Is that foreign interventionism?

No. Lifting the embargo would allow Cubans more freedom, if they chose to accept it. Lifting the embargo doesn't force them to trade with US, it only gives them more options.

 

[ARealConservative]

Barr is a neocon.


Baldwin '08

useful idiots

 

[Kade]

useful idiots

"Useful" I might not agree with.

 

[ARealConservative]

"Useful" I might not agree with.

not to us, but those in power approve of this activity for sure. the more the third party candidate supporters hate each other, the better!

 

[torchbearer]

not to us, but those in power approve of this activity for sure. the more the third party candidate supporters hate each other, the better!

and we've fallen right into that trap.
I warned of this very thing months ago when optionstrader began his quest months ago when the LP convention didn't go to Ruwart.
Wanna guess what would have happened with a Ruwart nomination?
Same thing. Just different people.

 

[ARealConservative]

and we've fallen right into that trap.
I warned of this very thing months ago when optionstrader began his quest months ago when the LP convention didn't go to Ruwart.
Wanna guess what would have happened with a Ruwart nomination?
Same thing. Just different people.

I'm not a libertarian Purist, but if Ruwart got the nod I would of spent as much time educating her supporters as I have done with Nader supporters......zilch

 

[Alex Libman]

He is the least interventionist serious candidate. Saying "we're gonna go from hero to zero immediately" is insane, it would leave a huge power vacuum. If it wasn't for that, Ron Paul would have been taken a whole lot more seriously by the mainstream in the primaries.

 

[Allen72289]

useful idiots

Stfu. Barr is a neocon, he's tagging along on RP's coat tails

 

[JosephTheLibertarian]

Stfu. Barr is a neocon, he's tagging along on RP's coat tails

Bob Barr? ha. Baldwin is the one saying "continuing the revolution" on his site. What a jackass

 

[torchbearer]

I'm not a libertarian Purist, but if Ruwart got the nod I would of spent as much time educating her supporters as I have done with Nader supporters......zilch

Wasn't implying you, but there were some LPers who were already starting their BS before the final ballots were counted.
This is not a very functional way for a "successful" enterprise to behave.

 

[Kade]

Bob Barr? ha. Baldwin is the one saying "continuing the revolution" on his site. What a jackass

People seem to honestly believe that Ron Paul supporters were comprised entirely of religious conservatives and neo-libertarians.

 

[torchbearer]

People seem to honestly believe that Ron Paul supporters were comprised entirely of religious conservatives and neo-libertarians.

Our coalition comes from every walk of life, that is why tolerance is so important.
If someone is making an effort to move towards individual liberty and less government, we should never ban them or push them away, but foster them, and welcome them.
This is how we will grow, and maybe someday soon, take political offices.
The current infighting, and trashing of 3rd party candidates because of their disagreements will accomplish the opposite.

 

[tonesforjonesbones]

Baldwin is not tagging along on Ron Paul's coat tails??? Come on people. Both of them, Barr and Baldwin, want the Ron Paul supporters...and naturally so. Baldwin isn't getting anywhere and it's just splitting the effort, along with the sourpuss libertarians who resent that their candidate of choice didn't win the nomination. NONE of this is doing the revolution one bit of good. We are split and fighting and the 2 major parties and wicked news media are loving every minute of it. What a shame. TONES

 

[sidster]

Baldwin is not tagging along on Ron Paul's coat tails??? Come on people. Both of them, Barr and Baldwin, want the Ron Paul supporters...and naturally so. Baldwin isn't getting anywhere and it's just splitting the effort, along with the sourpuss libertarians who resent that their candidate of choice didn't win the nomination. NONE of this is doing the revolution one bit of good. We are split and fighting and the 2 major parties and wicked news media are loving every minute of it. What a shame. TONES

I see you were surprisingly quiet in regard to a direct question to you?
So I'll ask again:

Bob Barr IS spreading Ron Paul's freedom message..

Maybe I'm confused. So you are saying foreign interventionism IS
part of Ron Paul's Freedom Message? A simple "yes" or "no"
would do.

 

[sidster]

Our coalition comes from every walk of life, that is why tolerance is so important.

tolerance is what has gotten this country into the mess it is in.

 

[tonesforjonesbones]

Nope. Ron Paul is not for interventionism..neither is Bob Barr. TONES (or Baldwin)