Barack Obama urges world to stand against 'aggressive nationalism'

I've always had the feeling that all along, Obama has actually been campaigning to be the leader of planet earth.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RJB
Did the the neocons puppet dronegangsta buy that flag pin with his own funds or that is tax payers funded display of nationalism?



When one of the most notorios drone gangsters in history lectures against "aggressive nationalism", that is highly newsworthy story. Why would you not care about such a historic story if you care about political health of US?



Related

Graphic link: Aggressive nationalism gone wild

salute2.jpg

Obama-American-Flag-Pin-2-1.jpg


Obama-American-Flag-Pin-3.jpg

http://www.readingthepictures.org/2008/04/sights-and-symbols-of-silly-season-lapel-edition/

I guess you can call this post fake news by omission. The source of the pictures are in the link above and you can see someone made an intentional decision not to post the middle picture. The question we should ask ourselves is if this decision was due to laziness, ignorance or just the desire to get some of that CNN attention and peddle fake news.

The sad thing is that Obama is such a scumbag that you don't need to make sh*t up in order to criticize him. Keep chipping away at little credibility you still have, you people are your own worst enemies. And btw, Obama is no longer the president :)
 
http://www.readingthepictures.org/2008/04/sights-and-symbols-of-silly-season-lapel-edition/

I guess you can call this post fake news by omission. The source of the pictures are in the link above and you can see someone made an intentional decision not to post the middle picture. The question we should ask ourselves is if this decision was due to laziness, ignorance or just the desire to get some of that CNN attention and peddle fake news.

The sad thing is that Obama is such a scumbag that you don't need to make sh*t up in order to criticize him. Keep chipping away at little credibility you still have, you people are your own worst enemies. And btw, Obama is no longer the president :)

Exactly.

And let us not forget that drone strikes started in 2004 under Bush, so at present we have 2 drone gangstas with one having 2x more years to drone. Trump may beat them both.

Since the inauguration of Donald J. Trump, drone strikes have increased over 400 percent.

As reported by Micah Zenko:

During President Obama’s two terms in office, he approved 542 such targeted strikes in 2,920 days — one every 5.4 days. From his inauguration through today, President Trump had approved at least 36 drone strikes or raids in 45 days — one every 1.25 days.

https://www.thenewamerican.com/usne...one-strikes-up-432-percent-under-donald-trump
 
No need to get emotional and worse collectivist when responding to an individual's quick response.

Thank you for the DD and correction. And you could have just have asked what the motivation was if you really had any doubts; it was to expose the dubious hypocrisy of a has-been puppetbag of neocons/his PSOs in a hurry ( apparently without investing as much time as you did to find a flaw in this response).
Even if one of the image is in accurate, I still think the material argument is valid.
 
Increased posperity?

That boy is smoking way too much crack.
 
No need to get emotional and worse collectivist when responding to an individual's quick response.

Quick response? is that the excuse people now give for putting out fake news. I bet you would also call BS if CNN used that excuse. Emotional, worse collectivist? WTF are you talking about?

Thank you for the DD and correction. And you could have just have asked what the motivation was if you really had any doubts; it was to expose the dubious hypocrisy of a has-been puppetbag of neocons/his PSOs in a hurry ( apparently without investing as much time as you did to find a flaw in this response).
Even if one of the image is in accurate, I still think the material argument is valid.

You talk about fake news all the time but you don't seem to understand what it is. It is not just false information but it is the spin hucksters like you put on news to deceive the regular viewer. Also, you are very welcome, I take it as my duty to expose fake news peddlers especially the hypocritical ones on this site who post under the banner of anti establishment flag. I publicly asked the question not because I did not have the answer but for the sole purpose of exposing you, its no fun asking you the question in some private chat.

Lastly, you have to seriously move on from Obama. You know, I used to think my obsession for Stefan Molyneux and Alex Jones was reaching its limit but your obsession with Obama tells me that I still have ways to go before I reach the top. I suggest you take a break, read a book, go out, try a new recipe, work on your abs or just something that would keep your mind off Obama cos that is what I do to temper by obsession for those guys I mentioned above. Obama was a very bad guy but he is no longer president. Move on
 
If we don’t stand up for tolerance and moderation and respect for others, if we begin to doubt ourselves and all that we have accomplished, then much of the progress that we have made will not continue,” he said.

images
 
juleswin said:
The sad thing is that Obama is such a scumbag that you don't need to make sh*t up in order to criticize him.

EM.
While your other commentary may have some valid basis, language in this sentence is bit shocking. Not a fan of Obama and he was puppet of very controversial neocons lobbies but don't you think use of s-word like this could bring down the dignity of the office.
 
When one of the most notorios drone gangsters in history lectures against "aggressive nationalism", that is highly newsworthy story. Why would you not care about such a historic story if you care about political health of US?


Liberal scum spout these lies every day, now that he is out of office he is just another loud mouth.
 
EM.
While your other commentary may have some valid basis, language in this sentence is bit shocking. Not a fan of Obama and he was puppet of very controversial neocons lobbies but don't you think use of s-word like this could bring down the dignity of the office.
What dignity?
 
Frame this one.

“But the future does not favor the strongman,” Obama said. “I believe deeply that the liberal international order; order based not just on military power or national affiliations, but on principles — the rule of law, human rights and individual freedoms — is the only choice.”
 
Back
Top