I've always had the feeling that all along, Obama has actually been campaigning to be the leader of planet earth.
Did the the neocons puppet dronegangsta buy that flag pin with his own funds or that is tax payers funded display of nationalism?
When one of the most notorios drone gangsters in history lectures against "aggressive nationalism", that is highly newsworthy story. Why would you not care about such a historic story if you care about political health of US?
Related
Graphic link: Aggressive nationalism gone wild
![]()
![]()
![]()
http://www.readingthepictures.org/2008/04/sights-and-symbols-of-silly-season-lapel-edition/
I guess you can call this post fake news by omission. The source of the pictures are in the link above and you can see someone made an intentional decision not to post the middle picture. The question we should ask ourselves is if this decision was due to laziness, ignorance or just the desire to get some of that CNN attention and peddle fake news.
The sad thing is that Obama is such a scumbag that you don't need to make sh*t up in order to criticize him. Keep chipping away at little credibility you still have, you people are your own worst enemies. And btw, Obama is no longer the president![]()
Since the inauguration of Donald J. Trump, drone strikes have increased over 400 percent.
As reported by Micah Zenko:
During President Obama’s two terms in office, he approved 542 such targeted strikes in 2,920 days — one every 5.4 days. From his inauguration through today, President Trump had approved at least 36 drone strikes or raids in 45 days — one every 1.25 days.
Exactly.
And let us not forget that drone strikes started in 2004 under Bush, so at present we have 2 drone gangstas with one having 2x more years to drone. Trump may beat them both.
https://www.thenewamerican.com/usne...one-strikes-up-432-percent-under-donald-trump
Ender, an Obama apologist.![]()
timosman, a guy w/no knowledge of real history.![]()
FFS, even you could do better than this.![]()
FFS, even you should stop with the insults etc.![]()
Just put it on ignore like everyone else has done.
No need to get emotional and worse collectivist when responding to an individual's quick response.
Quick response? is that the excuse people now give for putting out fake news. I bet you would also call BS if CNN used that excuse. Emotional, worse collectivist? WTF are you talking about?
Thank you for the DD and correction. And you could have just have asked what the motivation was if you really had any doubts; it was to expose the dubious hypocrisy of a has-been puppetbag of neocons/his PSOs in a hurry ( apparently without investing as much time as you did to find a flaw in this response).
Even if one of the image is in accurate, I still think the material argument is valid.
“If we don’t stand up for tolerance and moderation and respect for others, if we begin to doubt ourselves and all that we have accomplished, then much of the progress that we have made will not continue,” he said.
juleswin said:The sad thing is that Obama is such a scumbag that you don't need to make sh*t up in order to criticize him.
When one of the most notorios drone gangsters in history lectures against "aggressive nationalism", that is highly newsworthy story. Why would you not care about such a historic story if you care about political health of US?
What dignity?EM.
While your other commentary may have some valid basis, language in this sentence is bit shocking. Not a fan of Obama and he was puppet of very controversial neocons lobbies but don't you think use of s-word like this could bring down the dignity of the office.