August 23 - MSNBC: Ron Paul Slams WTC Mosque Protesters [14 mins] WOW

I knew the second they played the Glenn Beck clip that they would play the race card on him for saying the phrase "Good Muslim." You could just see that lady ready to pounce. There's a couple things wrong with this...

1. I'm no fan of Glen Beck, but from that clip it was obvious that when he used the term "Good Muslim" he simply meant Muslims that aren't radical or trying to engage in Jihad.

2. MSNBC was way too quick to play the race card (AGAIN!!!) and you could see that lady practically drooling over the opportunity. And this time they just twisted words to take advantage of a cheap opportunity.

3. They droned on about it for 5 minutes.

Thank goodness the host was kind enough to quote Paul so thoroughly. I still haven't finished watching the clip yet so hopefully the cheap racial talk subsides into something actually constructive.

EDIT: Finished the clip and the rest of the discussion was pretty good. Glad to see Paul getting some positive coverage on MSNBC


Um, the term "Good Muslim" does indicate a pretty fucked up view of Muslims. The term "Good Muslim" is a lot like "Good Negro" or "White Trash" - in that it implies that there is a need to separate a particular sub-set of a group from the rest of the group because of the traits that the subgroup displays but that the group as a whole generally does not. It's really pretty obvious. You say "White Trash" because, for the most part, Whites are on the the privileged end of the economic spectrum (and thus an separate term or exception must be made to identify those who are not)- whether or not that fact is true, it's implied in the term. Just like the term "good Muslims" implies that the majority of Muslims, or a large portion, are "not good". If not, why not just say Muslims or most Muslims?
 
Why isn't anyone pointing out the obvious hypocrisy?
Christian neocons are going crazy about the mosque in NY (which BTW is going to be the 2nd closest mosque to ground zero!)

But do these neocons have any problems with Christian churches being built in Iraq, where FAR more than 3000 people have been murdered?

lol, getting your average conservative or neo-con to understand that comparison is more of an accomplishment than tunneling to the center of the earth
 
Well you clearly didn't listen to what he said. He said he doesn't care about the darn place, he cares about foreign policy. Stop buying into this false 2-team paradigm.


Oh, and "gadfly" at about 7minutes in. :mad:

Agreed. He said specifically, "I don't care of it gets built or not."

As far as the gadfly reference, as mentioned above, at least they didn't use quixotic. I'm alright with gadfly among the adjectives used to describe Ron Paul. And its actually quite the compliment.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_gadfly

"Gadfly" is a term for people who upset the status quo by posing upsetting or novel questions, or just being an irritant.

The term "gadfly" (Ancient Greek: μυω̃ψ, myops)[1] was used by Plato in the Apology[2] to describe Socrates' relationship of uncomfortable goad to the Athenian political scene, which he compared to a slow and dimwitted horse. The Bible also references the gadfly in terms of political influence; The Book of Jeremiah (46:20, Darby Bible) states "Egypt is a very fair heifer; the gad-fly cometh, it cometh from the north." The term has been used to describe many politicians and social commentators.

During his defense when on trial for his life, Socrates, according to Plato's writings, pointed out that dissent, like the gadfly, was easy to swat, but the cost to society of silencing individuals who were irritating could be very high. "If you kill a man like me, you will injure yourselves more than you will injure me," because his role was that of a gadfly, "to sting people and whip them into a fury, all in the service of truth."

In modern and local politics, gadfly is a term used to describe someone who persistently challenges people in positions of power, the status quo or a popular position.[3] For example, Morris Kline wrote "There is a function for the gadfly who poses questions that many specialists would like to overlook. Polemics are healthy."[4] The word may be uttered in a pejorative sense, while at the same time be accepted as a description of honourable work or civic duty.[5]
 
i can already see the republican primary ad in 2012, " ron paul supported the mosque at hollowed ground zero! against the wishes of new yorkers and american patriots. "
 
good Moslem bad Moslem? Good Christian bad Christian? good Catholic bad Catholic? good Jew bad Jew? I hate collectivization.
 
Last edited:
when girls talk about me and say "he's a good guy" i'm fumingly offended for all the obviously sensitive reasons.

/endsarcasm
 
this is why Ron is so superior to Rand.

god i love that man...

irony of all this is that Muslims had nothing to do with 9/11!
 
irony of all this is that Muslims had nothing to do with 9/11!


I know, that's why they're covering this at all!

They know America is trying to puke up all this Islamophobia that they've been trying to ram down our throats since 9/11, because America is growing wise to what has just hit us in the face during the past 10 years.

And Americans are not as gung-ho in support of Israel anymore, because of Israel's own actions, coupled with the regurgitation of Islamophobia.


Get with the program people. There are actually crazy Christian and Jewish fundamentalists in positions of power that literally believe they are initiating the end of the world and that it's somehow their duty. George Bush said himself he was doing the work of God when he invaded Iraq and Afghanistan. RELIGIOUS FUNDAMENTALISM IS CRAZY!! KILLING IS AGAINST YOUR OWN RULES!!
 
Well, I leaving this Ron Paul Board!!!! he supports the Mosque. Good bye!!!!!!

If this is for real then...

Don't let the door hit your ass on the way out. It's not you're say anyways whether it'd be built or not, and that was his point. Paul protects the smallest of all minorities: the individual. In order to protect the individual, one must support private property rights.
 
when girls talk about me and say "he's a good guy" i'm fumingly offended for all the obviously sensitive reasons.

/endsarcasm

You should be. If you haven't noticed yet, if you are called a good guy, it means they want to talk to you about their problems because you are sensitive, but if you are called a bad guy, it means they want to F*** you because you are aggressive. Sad truth.
 
Calling someone a "good Muslim" or a "bad Muslim" is not necessarily derogatory, it depends on who says it. I have a very difficult time believing that Beck really feels that Islam is "a beautiful religion." He says "fanatical" Muslims are a threat. I think "fanatics" of any religion are a threat, including Mormons, which he claims to be.
 
Calling someone a "good Muslim" or a "bad Muslim" is not necessarily derogatory, it depends on who says it. I have a very difficult time believing that Beck really feels that Islam is "a beautiful religion." He says "fanatical" Muslims are a threat. I think "fanatics" of any religion are a threat, including Mormons, which he claims to be.

Agree. Some other guy said that if it were true that it was derogatory, then he should feel offended if someone called him "a good guy", because that implies guys are usually awful.
 
In the CNN interview, Paul actually said, "I don't care if it's built or not."

Of course, he neither wants to dictate the property owners to build it or not. The decision lies with them - if you specifically want that mosque to be build, you can try to convince them to do so, if you don't want it build, you're of course free to voice your concern as well, but you must ultimately recognize that the decision is not yours, but it's the decision of the owners and you must accept it whether you like it or not. I think that's what he meant by "I don't care": He is indifferent to the mosque being built, but he wants to defend their right to do what they want with their property.
 
FYI on Beck using the "good Muslims" phrase: Rand used it in a Newsmax Interview as well. No big deal.
 
Back
Top