Attention Media and GOP: "No one but Paul" POLL ADDED

[Anti Federalist]

Alright.

Then we'd better get over here and do our thing. Cain is leading RP by 35 to 28 pct.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/polls/2011/sep/25/who-your-gop-presidential-candidate/results/

You've got to have an account to vote.

 

[NorfolkPCSolutions]

hxxp://www.washingtontimes.com/polls...idate/results/

You've got to have an account to vote.

All it asked for was an email address. Consider giving it your spam address...no harm done.

It can be practically guaranteed that if Cain does well in this poll, we will see article after article on Monday saying, "Wow, Herman Cain is HUGE on the internet - he must have more support than Ron Paul!"

So give the damn poll a spam address and make your voice heard. I thought everyone had a second email address dedicated to these kinds of situations...

I'd sure like to see Ron Paul winning in this one. It's all a part of a plan that Cain goes on the upswing.

Charges of racism will be rampant in the 2012 election.

 

[Brett85]

What about a candidate you agreed with 3% of the time vs a candidate you agreed with 1% of the time?

Then it wouldn't be worth voting for the Republican nominee. If it got to the point where I felt that the GOP nominee was just as bad as Obama, I would vote 3rd party. Romney probably is almost as bad as Obama in my opinion, and if he picked Marco Rubio as his VP, that move might push me over the top and make me vote for a 3rd party candidate. Rubio is a hardcore neo-conservative and internationalist who's even worse on foreign policy issues than Santorum is. If the GOP keeps insisting that Rubio has to be the VP choice, I think you'll see quite a few traditional conservatives support a 3rd party candidate instead. So I'm not saying that I'll blindly support the GOP nominee, but there's at least a chance that I'll support the GOP nominee, while there's basically no chance that the majority of people here will support the GOP nominee.

 

[raanderson20]

Video I made of Paul in LA

Huge crowds for Ron Paul in Los Angeles California!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gwgp1dUmaIw

 

[Anti Federalist]

hxxp://www.washingtontimes.com/polls...idate/results/



All it asked for was an email address. Consider giving it your spam address...no harm done.

It can be practically guaranteed that if Cain does well in this poll, we will see article after article on Monday saying, "Wow, Herman Cain is HUGE on the internet - he must have more support than Ron Paul!"

So give the damn poll a spam address and make your voice heard. I thought everyone had a second email address dedicated to these kinds of situations...

I'd sure like to see Ron Paul winning in this one. It's all a part of a plan that Cain goes on the upswing.

Charges of racism will be rampant in the 2012 election.

LoL - already done my brother, I was just making the fact known.

 

[NorfolkPCSolutions]

LoL - already done my brother, I was just making the fact known.

I do hope I did not offend! Have a good day, friend.

 

[PastaRocket848]

i just bought noonebutpaul.com for $0.99. any designers want to build a petition website and ill do the back-end/hosting?

 

[Captain Shays]

NO ONE But Paul. Lesser of two evils is still evil. You WILL NOT choose for us.

 

[Sjmfury]

No one but Paul!

 

[69360]

I absolutely, no way, no how would vote for Romney, Perry or Santorum.

I would definitely vote for Gary Johnson, the others I would consider along with a 3rd party.

But why even talk about it at this point? Focus on winning the GOP nomination for Ron Paul.

 

[dusman]

No One But Paul!

 

[StudentForPaul08]

No One But PAUL!

 

[XTreat]

Nobp

 

[Anti Federalist]

But why even talk about it at this point? Focus on winning the GOP nomination for Ron Paul.

It's not talk, it's strategy.

It's way to shift that contingent of the GOP rank and file that reason, honesty, adherence to principles and the constitution, cannot reach.

They are concerned only with "beating Obama".

Well, you won't do it, beat Obama, without us, so take your choice:

Unite behind Ron Paul or lose to Obama, again.

And, just for the record, on a personal financial level, my income and job prospects would improve many fold, by backing any one of the GOP establishment candidates that would almost certainly replace Ken Salazar at Interior. I could stand to regain roughly $30,000 a year of income that has been lost since 2008 if just he was removed and the logjams he has placed, both before and after the Deepwater Horizon disaster, in the way of my industry removed.

Now, believe what you want, but from my end, this ain't internet bloviating and "blow-hardiness". I got real skin in this game.

No One But Paul!!!

 

[Paul or not at all]

We need graphic art that says this.

 

[Sola_Fide]

Paul or nothing baby.

Ron Paul is my president. If he doesn't win, I will see who the LP or the CP is putting up this year.

 

[Flugel89]

Ron Paul 2012.

Whether he's nominated or I have to write him in, he has my vote.

 

[donnay]

No one but Paul!!

 

[NorfolkPCSolutions]

As of 6:11pm Sunday, RP is ahead in the poll located at

washingtontimes.com/polls/2011/sep/25/who-your-gop-presidential-candidate/results/

but the lead keeps seeming to grow and decline, grow and decline. Has anyone else noticed this?

If the Herman Cain folks are reading this forum, post in this thread and let us know. Perhaps we could speak to each other and learn more about our favored candidates.

Otherwise, something fishy might be going on. Okay, back to my real life.

 

[tremendoustie]

This could be turned around on us if Ron actually won the nomination. A lot of Republicans would just say, "if Ron and his supporters were never willing to endorse the Republican nominee, then why should we endorse Ron Paul? Loyalty has to run both ways.

Such "loyalty" shouldn't run either way. Our only loyalty should be to what's right, just, and moral -- we should never support any organization when they commit evil.

People shouldn't expect GOP partisan types to endorse Ron if he wins the nomination. They would have no reason to endorse him when Ron and most of his hardcore followers will never endorse the GOP nominee.

I feel sorry for people who think this way. As if blind allegiance to a club trumps principles.

The fact is that I know many people who won't support Ron because they don't consider him to be any kind of a loyal Republican.

If people are voting based on who's "loyal", instead of what's right, that's the problem right there.

They simply consider him to be a libertarian who has to run as a Republican in order to get elected.

So again, the definition of a Republican is a person who has no principles at all, but blindly votes for whichever candidate has an R next to their name, no matter how anti-liberty they are? Count me out of that club.

People who are committed to the Republican Party obviously aren't going to support somebody like that.

People who are "committed" to any party need to reevaluate their priorities, and create an allegiance to something inherently good and right, rather than a particular fallible group of people.