XTreat
Member
- Joined
- May 1, 2011
- Messages
- 1,391
I know this guy was the property owner, and not law enforcement, but in general I think tazers are disguising, makes me feel sick every time I see one being used.
I recall them being introduced in my country as a "less lethal" alternative to a firearm, which I think is fine. But then the measure for using one needs to be that the use of a firearm would otherwise have been appropriate. Almost every time I see a tazer used, a firearm would not have been appropriate.
Today they seem to be used as a device for threatening electrocution in order to gain compliance. Basically the threat of torture.
Granted this guy was apparently trying to exercise his property rights, but I still think the tazer, like the drone, has so much scope to be abused it seems to me to be an almost entirely negative instrument. Makes me shudder.
I am not gonna say you are wrong, but I have to wonder if hitting the lady with the baton would have been better.