Atheist Ron Paul supporters

[acptulsa]

Great post except for the conclusion.

By disagreeing with each other’s beliefs, we are not “attacking each other” or “fighting amongst each other & falling down” (both phrases implying real aggression), but are only doing what you previously described: practicing “free speech”. And in the case of atheists disagreeing with Christian beliefs, the “speech” is literally about “the unpopular thing”.

So while I completely (fight hard to) defend the rights of the religious to disagree with the non-religious and vise versa, the problem is predominantly the religious who claim that the non-religious SHOULD NOT disagree with the religious. (I have a whole thread about this in this same forum. You might want to check it out.)

Judge not lest ye be judged.

You can no more prove nonexistence than someone can prove existence. So, you're arguing a point of faith as surely as anyone in this thread--and more than most. Call it religious faith, call it non-religious faith, suit yourself. But you are arguing a point of faith either way.

And I've never seen anyone argue that you have the right to argue your fool head off about this. But I've seen a whole lot of people say that doing it rudely, and doing it rudely here of all places (this site being in support of a man of faith in God), is trollish behavior.

Care to argue that specific point? Or will you duck and cover and talk about pasta again?

 

[idirtify]

Judge not lest ye be judged.

You can no more prove nonexistence than someone can prove existence. So, you're arguing a point of faith as surely as anyone in this thread--and more than most. Call it religious faith, call it non-religious faith, suit yourself. But you are arguing a point of faith either way.

And I've never seen anyone argue that you have the right to argue your fool head off about this. But I've seen a whole lot of people say that doing it rudely, and doing it rudely here of all places (this site being in support of a man of faith in God), is trollish behavior.

Care to argue that specific point? Or will you duck and cover and talk about pasta again?

I keep going back to my previous comment, and for the life of me I can’t figure how yours is a reply to it. It doesn’t seem to address any points I made. I don’t think I was ever trying to prove non-existence, and I’m not sure what you mean by “arguing a point of faith”. I mean it sounds like something I would freely do; but if you want to call it “trollish behavior”, you really need to explain better – so I can UNDERSTAND your specific point. BTW, when have I “ducked and covered” and/or changed the subject?

 

[libertarian4321]

Until recently, I was an atheist.

Then I was touched by the noodley appendage of the Flying Spaghetti Monster.

I have seen that there is a God, I am now a practicing Pastafarian.

 

[Revolution9]

Until recently, I was an atheist.

Then I was touched by the noodley appendage of the Flying Spaghetti Monster.

I have seen that there is a God, I am now a practicing Pastafarian.

A bulging waistline is the only benefit of your narrow minded attempt at puerile humor.

Rev9

 

[idirtify]

A bulging waistline is the only benefit of your narrow minded attempt at puerile humor.

Rev9

No less humorous and fattening than bread and wine, I imagine.

 

[Revolution9]

No less humorous and fattening than bread and wine, I imagine.

Non-sequitor. They have nothing in common by analogy or metaphysically. Why do you clowns always open your face and promptly insert your foot in your piehole?

Rev9

 

[idirtify]

Non-sequitor. They have nothing in common by analogy or metaphysically. Why do you clowns always open your face and promptly insert your foot in your piehole?

Rev9

“Non sequitur”?? “Not analogous”?? My joke followed yours because it was analogous to yours; fattening pasta being the sacrament of Pastafarians, and fattening bread and wine being the sacrament of Christians. And it is curious that you would accuse me of a logical fallacy WHILE committing TWO offensive INSULTS (ad hominem). (BTW, you are flagged.)

Readers: Once again we have a religious advocate resorting to the initiation of aggression.

 

[libertarian4321]

A bulging waistline is the only benefit of your narrow minded attempt at puerile humor.

Rev9

This from a guy with 4,076 posts, at least 50% of which are puerile or incoherent.

Nevertheless, I understand your attempts to persecute me and put down my religion- you do it out of fear.

Did not the Romans do the same to early Christians?

I shall not falter. I will resist your lame attempts to mock my religion.

For I am a Pastafarian. I follow the ONE TRUE GOD!

May you one day see the light and become a believer in the FSM.

Ramen.

 

[idirtify]

This from a guy with 4,076 posts, at least 50% of which are puerile or incoherent.

Nevertheless, I understand your attempts to persecute me and put down my religion- you do it out of fear.

Did not the Romans do the same to early Christians?

I shall not falter. I will resist your lame attempts to mock my religion.

For I am a Pastafarian. I follow the ONE TRUE GOD!

May you one day see the light and become a believer in the FSM.

Ramen.

I love it!

You know, actually…the truth behind Christianity may be MORE comical than Pastafarianism or the FSM. If you are aware of the theories of John M Allegro and the entheogenic and fertility origins of religion, you may know what I’m talking about. Apparently, the original Christians were actually all about worshipping sex and erections and a hallucinogenic species of mushroom. I’m serious! The image of the cross actually symbolizes a mature toadstool and/or an erect penis. And the thing that’s so frustrating to believers in conventional Christianity is that the theories are backed with very good evidence and actually make scientific sense. Even down to the entirely credible part that explains why the bible was written as a codebook for transmitting secret information about the drug; because of ancient drug prejudice/prohibition. In fact, the FSM religion could have just as easily adopted facets of the REAL Christianity (original mushroom cult) and it would have been just as effective.

 

[TER]

This from a guy with 4,076 posts, at least 50% of which are puerile or incoherent.

Nevertheless, I understand your attempts to persecute me and put down my religion- you do it out of fear.

Did not the Romans do the same to early Christians?

I shall not falter. I will resist your lame attempts to mock my religion.

For I am a Pastafarian. I follow the ONE TRUE GOD!

May you one day see the light and become a believer in the FSM.

Ramen.

Mocking people who believe in God is harassment and you have been flagged.

 

[Revolution9]

Nevertheless, I understand your attempts to persecute me and put down my religion- you do it out of fear.

Piffle. And Ramen noodles often contain boiled down Yakuza victims. Enjoy.

Rev9

 

[Revolution9]

I love it!

Of course you do. Until you find out what love really is and then you will abhor it for the iconographic connection to lower astral forms who feed on negative emotions and sex without love. Watch out when it attaches to a loved one.

Rev9

 

[Revolution9]

The image of the cross actually symbolizes a mature toadstool and/or an erect penis.

The cross metaphysically as a sigil represents the Universal Horizon. It does not look like a mushroom anymore than an atomic explosion resembles a TV antenna.

Rev9

 

[Revolution9]

Mocking people who believe in God is harassment and you have been flagged.

He cannot mock me TER. He mocks himself by proxy. I don't "believe" in God. I have direct experience. I do not "believe" in the Authority of Jesus Christ. I have direct experience. I do not "believe" I am blessed. I have direct experience. I do not believe I am perfect. I have direct experience

Yer Pal
Rev9

 

[Revolution9]

“Non sequitur”?? “Not analogous”?? My joke followed yours because it was analogous to yours; fattening pasta being the sacrament of Pastafarians, and fattening bread and wine being the sacrament of Christians. And it is curious that you would accuse me of a logical fallacy WHILE committing TWO offensive INSULTS (ad hominem). (BTW, you are flagged.)

Readers: Once again we have a religious advocate resorting to the initiation of aggression.

You are often mistaken. Take that to heart for a correction. I advocate nothing. I am what I am and say what I say. I am not trying to create converts, but if yer playing a game of mockery in a childish manner and get your comeuppance with mockery directed back and whine about it, when being called a clown is due to your clowning around and my calling you out on it, then the leg you think you are standing on is gangrened and about to give out. Excuse me for not taking you seriously and for brandishing my anti-woowoo gun at you. I did not realize you were so frakkin' sensitive. Seems folks who like to dish it out are the first to get sensitized when the same treatment is dealt to them in return..but with more panache and flair.

Yer Pal
Rev9

 

[idirtify]

Mocking people who believe in God is harassment and you have been flagged.

The BELIEF is being mocked; NOT the people.

 

[idirtify]

Of course you do. Until you find out what love really is and then you will abhor it for the iconographic connection to lower astral forms who feed on negative emotions and sex without love. Watch out when it attaches to a loved one.

Rev9

So you are warning me about not knowing real love? So tell me, Rev, is your enlightenment into real love that which compels you to initiate aggression and insult others at the drop of a hat?? Or is it your sacred religious belief that compels you to do that?

 

[idirtify]

The cross metaphysically as a sigil represents the Universal Horizon. It does not look like a mushroom anymore than an atomic explosion resembles a TV antenna.

Rev9

Of course it looks like a mushroom. Here, I’ll make it easy for you. Look at the first letter in the word “TV”, and then look at the profile of a mature toadstool.

 

[idirtify]

You are often mistaken. Take that to heart for a correction. I advocate nothing. I am what I am and say what I say. I am not trying to create converts, but if yer playing a game of mockery in a childish manner and get your comeuppance with mockery directed back and whine about it, when being called a clown is due to your clowning around and my calling you out on it, then the leg you think you are standing on is gangrened and about to give out. Excuse me for not taking you seriously and for brandishing my anti-woowoo gun at you. I did not realize you were so frakkin' sensitive. Seems folks who like to dish it out are the first to get sensitized when the same treatment is dealt to them in return..but with more panache and flair.

Yer Pal
Rev9

1. You advocate that I am often mistaken, and then immediately claim to advocate nothing.
2. You hurl insults, then characterize MY method of disagreement as “childish”.
3. You claim I deserved the insult “clown” because I “clown around”.
4. You commit insults and get flagged for it, then claim I’m “so frakkin' sensitive”.
5. You insult and then claim you are only dishing out what has been dealt.
---------------------------
1. Direct contradiction (MULTIPLE contradiction, since you have advocated multiple claims).
2. Kettle calling the pot black.
3. Blaming me for your baseless initiation of aggression.
4. Trying to excuse your aggression, yet making another insult in the process.
5. Trying out a second excuse for behaving aggressively.

Now…what were you calling “childish”??

 

[LibertyEagle]

Stop trying to pick another fight, idirtify.