Astrology: Charting the Rise of Ron Paul

Are we reaching a "tipping point" in the near future? This is talked about and presented as a demographic and marketing principle called Maloney's 16% Rule.

Here's the thread with diagram at post #8.

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?354994-Tipping-Point

The diagram shows that reaching the standard deviation boundary starts the snowball effect -- again not unlike the 100th monkey effect which, in his own way, Dr Paul has mentioned on numerous occasions -- the consistent steady increase of SOLID awareness and support will eventually reach critical mass (16%) and take off at a much higher rate. Also involved is a retooling and ramp up of the campaign organization and messaging.

I had to take more time to consider this Maloney 16% Rule to take in how the grassroots folks on the RPF boards have been responding since after the disappointing result in Nevada and somewhat lukewarm results this past Feb 7th. In the diagram is the 'chasm' boundary which I think the RP campaign is at right now and we (grassroots) are feeling this chasm and many threads have be up reflecting this sense of hitting a wall and losing momentum and therefore being adamant as to suggestions on how RP and the campaign staff need to make drastic strategy changes and get more direct and aggressive.

The RP campaign has been in more or less in 'scarcity mode' according to the diagram -- marketing and campaigning in a way where they are 'staying within themselves' and maintaining a consistency and viability. But now this chasm boundary is being felt and there are signs that they are going into 'social proof mode' by providing social proof to supporters and the public at large with a recent letter to supporters explaining their strategy and getting Doug Wead on the Rachel Maddow show to again explain and provide proof of a winning strategy and that we are doing better than perceived.

The RP campaign chart is expressing this need to push this 'social proof mode' by way of transit Venus making its ingress into assertive, dynamic Aries on Feb 8th and conjuncting transit Uranus in Aries yesterday and ingressing into the 11th House of social and political consciousness and movement. The chart ruler Mercury (messenger/communicator/Doug Wead) also made an exact ingress into the public, political 10th House yesterday. This chart continues to display a very accurate mapping of events thanks to the accuracy of the time of RP announcement discovered by the Political Astrology blogger/astrologer Patrick Watson. So props to him.

Today, Maine caucus day, transit Sun trines Ascendent, transit Mercury in sextile aspect to 11th House natal planets Jupiter, Mercury, Venus which is offset by retrograde transit Mars square Ascendent so some blockage of tonight's results indicated.

On Feb 14th -- NOBP moneybomb day -- a very timely day where transit Venus squares natal Pluto, transit Sun just recently ingresses into 10th House, transit Mercury ingresses into Pisces towards conjunction of natal Neptune in 10th House -- all very favorable and catalytic.

The dates again from last post indicating a building up phase but augmented by the 'social proof' mention today.
So dates to watch as signs of tipping points:

Feb 1 (also 55th wedding anniversary of Ron and Carol)
Feb 3
Feb 18-22 (Veterans for RP march on Whitehouse in Washington DC rally)
Feb 23 (financial/social support from influential celebrity/political types -- natural followup to rally event)
Feb 24-26 (Neptune return and Merc/Uran opposition aspect to Moon)
March 1-5
March 2-3 (major Uranus return - potential tipping point before Super Tuesday)
March 6-13
March 20-21
 
Today, Maine caucus day, transit Sun trines Ascendent, transit Mercury in sextile aspect to 11th House natal planets Jupiter, Mercury, Venus which is offset by retrograde transit Mars square Ascendent so some blockage of tonight's results indicated.

I had to come back to note the synchronicity of the retrograde transit of Mars square Ascendent as translating into the concept of obstruction or blockage of expression in the RP campaign chart. Various events occurred that signified this blockage -- sudden scheduling of 5 new pro-Romney caucus locations, canceling some caucuses due to weather, a poster on the grassroots forum showing the vote list of his county where he and his wife's votes were not counted -- definitely the dark side of retrograde Mars.

Again this particular transit offset the other favorable transits which still indicated RP's best performance and best percentage of 36%. So a mixed bag of transits and events.

In Romney's campaign chart retrograde Mars was more favorable in that it had transited its Ascendent around Feb 8th and into the 12th House -- translates to repressed anger being channeled into action by those who are behind the scenes -- distortion, manipulation and control tactics and the 'win at all costs' desire which led to the CPAC and the Maine caucus result.

Feb 14-15, while in the 12th House, this Mars transit squares the Midheaven (the cusp of the public/political 10th house) and so a possible negative exposure event regarding today's caucus results or even some other 'karmic dirt' exposed regarding the Romney campaign. Or more manipulation of power could occur in Romney's favor but at a potentially karmic cost in the long term.

This transit Mars will remain retrograde in the 12th house of Romney's campaign chart until April 14 where it stops at 4*41' Virgo and proceeds to forward motion again remaining in the 12th house until June 15th to make a return across the Ascendent. This imo may be a time of dissolution and undermining/undoing of the campaign for Romney as the transits already mentioned for the RP campaign chart indicate favorable events and positive momentum. I'm of course somewhat biased but this is a valid outcome, although not the only one.

This transit is also significant in Romney's personal natal chart in an opposition aspect to his Sun, Mercury and Mars which indicates oppositional forces at play and is problematic. Will not go into detail with dates and interpretations until further events unfold because free will always exists to alter the probabilities shown by transits and progressions -- especially if projected too far ahead.
 
Last edited:
onpaulflix.com/2012/02/ron-paul-announced-winner-of-washington-county-maine-caucus-2012-feb-18-2012/

1 of those "neglected" counties in Maine
4 votes Gingrich
8 vote Romney
57 vote Santorum
163 vote Paul
 
this is what I would call the tipping point, or turning point as one of the keywords for Chiron is often phrased. transit Chiron square Midheaven. This is where is starts to come to light that Maine was won by Paul.

Still a debate and a vote to watch and wait until Mar 6 where the good Jupiter stuff is.
 
I'm not a vedic astrologer so i don't even know if I would be doing this right

Astro-Research: US President Dasha
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGU4TYDgKVo&feature=related

So if Paul was in a Saturn Dasha that would be good...

http://www.astrojyoti.com/lesson9.htm
Dashas
The dasas are the ruling periods of planets. There are more than 50 different types of Dasha systems, but the most popular and accurate one is the Vimshottari Dasha system. We are explaining this system.
At the time of your birth, the star constellation in which your moon is placed in your birth chart, and the degrees in which it is placed, determines which dasas will be in operation during your life.

Depending on by how many degrees, moon has traveled in the nakshatra at the time of birth, the first dasa gets reduced proportionately.

I think his moon started near the end of Venus Dasha, about 3 years of it.
3+6+10+7+18+16+19=79
so still in Saturn Dasha until 79y/o

and everyone else:
obama in saturn dasha
romney in sun dasha
gingrich in jupiter dasha
santorum in saturn dasha

I guess according to this research someone with a Sun dasha has no chance.
 
Last edited:
Doing some testing tonight.

Let's see if I can get this image to be linked.

rpcampaign2.png
 
Last edited:
Well, the image went to ZOOMED OUT mode which doesn't quite fit but the link to another page does look OK.

Everyone is sensing the good momentum after the debate and after the Veteran's march in Washington DC so wanted to give this thread some pizzaz in the form of this RP Campaign Chart that we've been talking about. On the chart there are some brief and general notes based on my impressions so far. Much more detail needed to get a more full interpretation.
 
Topic

I am wondering what is going to happen in august that will cause problems. Will there be another 911 style event leading to criticism of Paul's foreign policy? What type of astrological events happened during 911?

Aug 30, and Nov 6
 
Last edited:
I am wondering what is going to happen in august that will cause problems. Will there be another 911 style event leading to criticism of Paul's foreign policy? What type of astrological events happened during 911?

Aug 30, and Nov 6
I don't think so. Pluto will be in a triple transit of Opposing Jupiter(Mar-Dec 2012). Danger of becoming arrogant and domineering to those around you. Becoming a law unto yourself. I already noticed the news ramped up pointing out Iran over and over after a few state primaries/causes were done.

November: Saturn conjunct Hades(unemployment of long duration, epidemics, potentially very negative stuff). Sort of suggests a sulky elite if you contemplate the cause and effect of previous banking history of the USA. When they stop lending money to punish economically. Or engage the USA in wars for not allowing them to be the bankers.

Pluto was making its transit conjunct to the USA Ascendant effectively by virtue of being in a triple transit of the Ascendant where it passes the same point 3 times due to retrograde motion. Suddenly everyone is wearing terrorist-colored sunglasses.
 
RP Campaign Chart midpoint trees
Sun=
Jupiter/Ascendant

Moon=
Mars/Midheaven
Jupiter/Neptune

Mercury=
Venus/Jupiter
Neptune/Node

Venus=
Neptune/Node
Sun/Uranus

Mars=
Sun/Saturn

Jupiter=
Saturn/Pluto
Sun/Moon
Mercury/Node
Venus/Node
Neptune/Ascendant

Saturn=
Moon/Jupiter
Sun/Neptune
Moon/Mercury

Uranus=
Moon/Saturn

Neptune=
Jupiter/Pluto

Pluto=
Saturn/Uranus
Sun/Midheaven

Node=
Jupiter/Midheaven

Ascendant=
Saturn/Neptune

Midheaven=
Jupiter/Ascendant
Mercury/Ascendant
Venus/Ascendant
Saturn/Pluto
Jupiter/Node
 
Last edited:
Paul
Feb 27
transit Jupiter conjunct Uranus

http://www.dailypaul.com/216764/rasmussen-ron-paul-beats-obama-by-2-points-for-the-first-time-ever
Paul 43 - Obama 41

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/pub...ministration/daily_presidential_tracking_poll
For the first time ever, Texas Congressman Ron Paul also leads the president. In that matchup, 43% prefer Paul and 41% Obama.


http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/general_election_paul_vs_obama-1750.html
General Election: Santorum vs. Obama
Rasmussen Tracking 2/24 - 2/26 1500 LV 45 43 Obama +2

General Election: Romney vs. Obama
Rasmussen Tracking 2/24 - 2/26 1500 LV 43 45 Romney +2

General Election: Gingrich vs. Obama
Rasmussen Reports 2/24 - 2/25 1000 LV 49 39 Obama +10

General Election: Paul vs. Obama
Rasmussen Reports 2/24 - 2/25 1000 LV 41 43 Paul +2
 
Last edited:
Romney
transit Uranus trine Saturn
Accumulated experience, organization , past efforts and hard work may be expected to count in your favor. People(often older people) and circumstances come along to provide you with rewards and recognition. It is possible that present circumstances may upset your traditional structures but the key is to incorporate the old with the new--getting rid of what is no longer viable or useful and adding the benefits of new people, new ideas, and new technology. You cannot manipulate events to bring about your own good fortune. They will come on their own and then it is up to you to react expediently.

Republican Party voted to ignore its own Rules
(and give the state-wide delegate to Romney)
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/01/michigan-delegates-mitt-romney-rick-santorum_n_1313710.html

A Michigan Republican committee voted Thursday to award 16 of the state's 30 nominating delegates to the Republican National Convention to Mitt Romney, and the remaining 14 to Rick Santorum.

According to MIRS, the committee voted 4-2 to give Romney Michigan's two at-large delegates.

The move came after Michigan's Tuesday Republican presidential primary showed the candidates splitting the state's delegates, though Romney won the popular vote.

Michigan Republicans award delegates based on congressional districts -- two for each of the state's 14 districts -- and two more awarded by the state-wide vote.

The Associated Press reported Thursday morning that Romney and Santorum would split the delegates evenly, 15 apiece. The Santorum campaign called the Michigan primary a tie for that reason.

But following the announcement, Michigan Radio reports that the Santorum campaign called foul play:

A spokesman for top rival Rick Santorum says the decision by party leaders calls into question the "legitimacy" of the Michigan Republican Party.
The committee vote Thursday afternoon gives an edge to Romney, and shows the former Massachusetts governor and Michigan native's influence in the state Republican Party. Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder endorsed Romney in the primary, and other prominent party officials supported his campaign and attended his Tuesday victory party.

Former Michigan Attorney General Mike Cox, who chairs the state GOP credentials committee, reportedly told MIRS the party decided to change the rules on delegate appointment. Cox was among those state party officials who endorsed Romney.

"It's kind of like Third World voting," Cox said. "We published rules and then we voted to change the rules."

UPDATE: 2:45 p.m. -- Republican National Committeeman Saul Anuzis released a statement claiming the party did not change any of its rules in deciding to award the at-large delegates to Romney:

Last night the Credentials Committee met via teleconference and voted to apply the rules as passed unanimously on February 4th which results in the 2 at large delegates be awarded to the statewide winner, Mitt Romney. There were no changes in rules or procedures, the Credential Committee only ratified the existing rules as previously passed after some made erroneous claims to the media that the at-large delegates would be split.
Despite Anuzis' insistence, some Republican activists quickly launched a petition campaign Thursday afternoon, looking to "stop the corruption at the highest levels of the Michigan Republican Party."

"In what was literally a middle of the night, smoke-filled backroom, the Establishment of the Michigan Republican Party voted to ignore its own Rules (which were submitted to the Republican National Committee on February 7, 2012) and to ignore the results of Tuesday's Primary Election."

According to the petitioners, Santorum should have gotten one at-large delegate and Romney the other, based on the candidates' close results in the statewide popular vote. Romney got 41 precent of the overall vote to Sanotorum's 38 percent.

UPDATE: 4:20 p.m. -- Hogan Gidley, Santorum's national communications director, released the following statement:

"There's just no way this is happening. We've all heard rumors that Mitt Romney was furious that he spent a fortune in his home state, had all the political establishment connections and could only manage [to] tie Rick Santorum. But we never thought the Romney campaign would try to rig the outcome of an election by changing the rules after the vote. This kind of back room dealing political thuggery just cannot and should not happen in America."

CORRECTION: An earlier version of this article erroneously identified Mike Cox as the chair of the Michigan GOP. He heads the state GOP's credentials committee.
 
Last edited:
Chart factors of today's article regarding Romney's cousins:
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?365144-Romney-Family-Members-Endorse-Ron-Paul-and-will-speak-at-Idaho-Caucus

In Romney's natal chart:
1. retrograde transit Mars (in 4th House) opposite Mercury (siblings, relatives) - 5 male cousins who will speak out against Romney in favor of RP
2. transit Mercury and Uranus are conjunct and in close separating conjunction of progressed Moon (ruler of 3rd House of siblings, cousins) which all trine Saturn which itself, is in the 3rd House of siblings and cousins. Uranus effect of the sudden, unexpected and getting 'outed' or publicized.
3. transit Moon in 4th House earlier today was opposite Venus and a few degrees from conjunct of Pluto -- the natal Venus-Pluto opposition being stressed
4. progressed Ascendent at (0 Leo 24) which is now less than 2 degrees to conjunct Saturn

In Romney Campaign chart:
1. in chart Mercury at 29* 46' Taurus square Neptune (0* 55' Pisces) -- this undermining behavior by the cousins affects Mercury which, in turn, rules the Gemini Midheaven and Gemini Moon (family, vulnerable psychological patterns), so becomes public and hurts the reputation and credibility of the campaign
2. progressed Moon at 1*33' Cancer and forming a square to Uranus (< 2.5 deg from exact square which occurs 13 May 2012 - the birthday of RP Campaign chart)
3. retrograde transit Mars in 12th House of karmic patterns (positive or negative) squares Sun (both natal and progressed) -- again conflict among males who have some negative history between them -- in this case Romney and his male cousins
 
Chart factors of today's article regarding Romney's cousins:
http://www.ronpaul2012.com/2012/03/...-family-members-as-surrogate-caucus-speakers/

In Romney's natal chart:
5. Transit Neptune square Ascendant
Your relationships with others are likely to become confused and difficult. Your direction in life may become confused as others try to dissuade you from a course which you have been committed to for years.

Neptune is an ego-denying planet. It will make you feel unsure of yourself. You will attract people who will take advantage of your vulnerability. And you will not be assertive about protecting your interests. It will difficult to think about your own goals and objectives in negotiations and thus you will not get what you want, even if the people you are dealing with are completely honest, and they may very well be dishonest with this transit.

There is a lesson in detachment. By bringing about a loss, neptune shows us our attachment to the material things and personal relationships have prevented us from being free. It is not neptune causing this as it may seem like a gas attack, but our own ego's relentless drive to maintain the game. And when your ego takes over like this your priorities are not set correctly and thus you are not likely to succeed.

The solution is to learn flow, to flow without any particular plan or objective and ask yourself how you got to where you are now in the first place. If dishonesty, yours or others, has brought you trouble, ask what purpose this has served. You were probably trying to protect something that wasn't worth protecting.

--can't say with certaintly when this will be in effect, but this new development with the Romney cousins is a fair clue. Could be all March(a fairly critcal month) or perhaps several months as Neptune stations before retrograding June 4 (2 degrees past whre it is now, and it passes the same spot in September and Jan2013)
 
Last edited:
Romney Lags in Small Donors as Big Givers Hit Limits
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/08/u...-roots-fund-raising.html?_r=1&ref=todayspaper

Mitt Romney has more delegates, more money and more endorsements than any of his rivals for the Republican presidential nomination. But with a split verdict on Super Tuesday and no quick finish in sight, he is struggling to match the enthusiasm and money his rivals have harnessed from grass-roots donors.

While Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich have enjoyed million-dollar surges of small checks after their primary victories, Mr. Romney has instead relied overwhelmingly on his network of high-dollar donors, attending lavish fund-raising events in Washington; Palm Beach, Fla.; and New York City that have both swelled his campaign accounts and fueled perceptions that he is favored more by his party’s elite than by its conservative base.

With an unusually large proportion of his donors already giving the maximum contribution allowed by federal law, Mr. Romney’s campaign has made repeated appeals to grass-roots donors in recent days, including a thank-you note from Mr. Romney, sent just minutes after he was declared the victor in Ohio’s primary, asking supporters for $10 contributions.

Mr. Romney has tacked a request for help onto the end of his stump speech in recent days, directing supporters to his Web site, and the campaign is preparing a program that will allow volunteers around the country to collect contributions by swiping credit cards through iPhones.

But several factors are working against him. Mr. Romney’s victories have come largely in states where he was favored to win, depriving him of the kind of dramatic upsets that can thrill grass-roots voters and spur them to donate. Interviews with more than a dozen supporters suggest that Mr. Romney has also been hampered by the widespread sense that he is the race’s de facto front-runner — and by his considerable personal wealth, which has left some of them thinking that Mr. Romney does not need their checks.

“He’s so rich he doesn’t need my support,” said Dulce Garcia, a retired teacher from Snellville, Ga., at a Romney rally there this week. “But I want Obama to be out of here.”

Some Romney supporters said they had never been asked by the campaign for a donation. Others said they backed Mr. Romney but had not yet given him any money.

“I support him sometimes, but not always financially,” said Joan Miller, 81, a retiree from Knoxville, Tenn. “I just never send the money in.”

A spokeswoman said on Wednesday that Mr. Romney raised $11 million in February, bringing his total for the cycle to $77 million, much more than any other Republican in the race. But relatively little of it has come from small checks. Through the end of January, Mr. Romney raised about $6.4 million in unitemized contributions of under $200, just 10 percent of the money he had raised. (Candidates are not required to break down individual contributions under $200.)

Representative Ron Paul of Texas, who has enjoyed a steady flow of grass-roots donations to his Web site, raised about $14.4 million in unitemized checks under $200, while Mr. Gingrich, who has a robust direct-mail operation dating back to his days in Congress, has taken in $8.8 million in such donations.

While Mr. Romney’s overall small-dollar total exceeds that of Rick Santorum, his closest rival, Mr. Santorum had the best month for small donors of any of the Republican candidates in January, capitalizing on his belated victory in Iowa to raise $2.6 million in contributions under $200. Millions more followed Mr. Santorum’s triple victories in Missouri, Colorado and Minnesota, according to his campaign.

Mr. Romney, who won in New Hampshire and Florida, took in just $1.2 million in small checks in January, suggesting that his steady accumulation of votes and delegates has not been accompanied by the sort of enthusiasm that yields spurts of grass-roots money.

The lack of small donations is one financial challenge facing the campaign. Another is spending: Mr. Romney spent $19 million in January, burning through much of the cash advantage he had accumulated in prior months. His campaign did relatively little advertising in advance of Super Tuesday, leaving the “super PAC” supporting him, Restore Our Future, to spend millions on ads on his behalf.
 
In support of the last few posts here's the Romney Campaign Chart with some brief and general comments and keeping in mind that there's much more detail involved with interpretation of a chart...transits, progressions, aspect analysis, archetypal analysis etc.

mrcampaign1.png
 
The event of big donors or 'fat cats' becoming maxed out was occurring as transiting Saturn in 2nd House went opposite Jupiter in 8th House during February and is now transiting retrograde (backward) indicating the depletion phase.

Jupiter in last degree of Aries in 8th House and as ruler of 4th House of grassroots support would indicate the Aries nature of initial enthusiasm for the 'fat cat' segment (Jupiter/Sagitarius) of the grassroots who would quickly max out to their limit of $2500 leaving a depletion for the rest of the campaign.

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal-a/2012_03/beyond_mitts_small_donor_probl035919.php

There are some immediate problems associated with depending so heavily on big donors, notes Waldman:

It may be harder to find a hundred people who’ll give $25 than that one donor who’ll give the legal maximum of $2,500, but they give you something the fat cat doesn’t: you can come back to them again and again and ask for more money, something the Obama campaign did very well in 2008. Once the fat cat maxes out to the campaign, he’s done, and the only other way he can help is through super PACs.

And Romney’s donors are “maxing out” at unusually high rates, as the New York Times’ Nick Confessore and Ashley Parker noted yesterday:

About 40 percent of Mr. Romney’s itemized individual contributors through January gave the maximum $2,500 allowable for the nominating fight, according to a study from the Campaign Finance Institute, the highest proportion of any candidate since 2000. That means they cannot give him any more money to use in the nominating battle.
 
Last edited:
moneybomb transits

I made this transit chart in response to the RP moneybomb video. There was also good transits to both the campaign chart and RP's natal chart on March 20 when the fundraiser and Leno appearance occurred. An exact opposition of transit Vesta to Saturn in the campaign chart, (along with short term transit Moon conjunct transit Pallas at 12Pis30 that afternoon) appears to reinforce the idea of financially committed support and activism by influential people ie Mark Spitznagel and Nassim Taleb who also want to buck the (Saturn) establishment.


moneybomb.png
 
Back
Top