Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher

I wonder where the ranch house is actually located?

Here,

bundy-ranch.jpg
 
If I was Harry Reid I would be on the phone pleading with the BLM not to go through with this. The economy is bad. No jobs. Saving destroyed. No sustainable future. Why put a huge bullseye on your forehead like that? And then stating that it's about the Law? Really? The same law that the chief legal authority Eric Holder scoffs at and selectively enforces? The same LAW that James Clapper broke? That inflexible construct?:D;)
 
Last edited:
Cattle, melons, and kids. Two of those things may get cut to ribbons by gunfire, and I doubt that law enforcement will aim at melons.

Fedzilla will be back to either bankrupt them in the Kangeroo courts or more than likely show up in their unawares and bulldoze the place over the bill.
 
Fedzilla will be back to either bankrupt them in the Kangeroo courts or more than likely show up in their unawares and bulldoze the place over the bill.

I am pretty sure the Defensive Measures being taken at this moment are not being advertized.
 
If I was Harry Reid I would be on the phone pleading with the BLM not to go through with this. The economy is bad. No jobs. Saving destroyed. No sustainable future. Why put a huge bullseye on your forehead like that? And then stating that it's about the Law? Really? The same law that the chief legal authority Eric Holder scoffs at and selectively enforces? The same LAW that James Clapper broke? That inflexible construct?:D;)

You're not Harry Reid. He doesn't give a shit. He's an "untouchable." In his own mind.
 
Unfortunately I have seen this before. The weight of the government usually crushes all the holdouts in the end. I saw very strong willed loggers and miners fight for years. The government can bide their time. I saw the same gun confrontations with quite a few miners and the feds back off but then come again. In the end they were smothered.

The difference now is that time is running out. America is on a 50+ year decline. The economy is slowly collapsing. Pensions are drying up.

I really think that what happened Saturday is a watershed event. A small one to be sure, but now there is a chink in the armor. Government employees basically do this for a pension. People at the Bundy Ranch are spending their own money. Government employees will not--can not--continue their endeavors over the coming decades when their very own financial infrastructure is falling apart.

The genie is now out of the bottle. People now know they can mount opposition. It is going to take a whole lot more than what they had Saturday; however, their (and our) resolve will continue to ascend, while the resolve of a financially failing government will decline.
 
The difference now is that time is running out. America is on a 50+ year decline. The economy is slowly collapsing. Pensions are drying up.

I really think that what happened Saturday is a watershed event. A small one to be sure, but now there is a chink in the armor. Government employees basically do this for a pension. People at the Bundy Ranch are spending their own money. Government employees will not--can not--continue their endeavors over the coming decades when their very own financial infrastructure is falling apart.

The genie is now out of the bottle. People now know they can mount opposition. It is going to take a whole lot more than what they had Saturday; however, their (and our) resolve will continue to ascend, while the resolve of a financially failing government will decline.

We have a near limitless resource of expendable bodies to throw into the fight. The government doesn't. The fed gov employees are only in it for a paycheck and pension. They want no part of a real struggle. In the long run, if they can't exterminate us early, they will lose miserably. At the higher echelons, they are keenly aware of us this fact, which explains their methodology and programs.
 
Last edited:
There's a big difference between some loggers in the '70's in N.Cal. and some cowpokes in the desert today...

I set chokers for Boise in '75-'76 in the Siuslaw forest so I know of whom you speak....
 
Ah yes,, your usual message.

"Give up, don't try, you can't win against the almighty government." (paraphrased)

Go lick boots elsewhere.

Damn it. That's not what he said. He is recounting what happened in Klamath Falls. Do you even remember it? It was AWFUL. Things can be learned from that and applied here and now for the better.

NO ONE SAID TO GIVE UP.
 
NO ONE SAID TO GIVE UP.
Yes he has. Many times,, any time anyone even mentions the proper and rightful use of the 2nd amendment.

It was the arms that backed off the BLM..
Not the unarmed protesters.

They tazed them. They sicked dogs on them. and would kill them without blinking.

It was the force of arms.. the rifles that surrounded them that caused them to back off and to surrender the stolen cattle.
 
Last edited:
Yes he has. Many times,, any time anyone even mentions the proper and rightful use of the 2nd amendment.

I see it nowhere in this thread. If you do, quote it.

He has lived through what happened at Klamath Falls. Instead of insulting him, maybe a better idea is to learn from it so this time it might not turn out the same way.
 
The difference now is that time is running out. America is on a 50+ year decline. The economy is slowly collapsing. Pensions are drying up.

I really think that what happened Saturday is a watershed event. A small one to be sure, but now there is a chink in the armor. Government employees basically do this for a pension. People at the Bundy Ranch are spending their own money. Government employees will not--can not--continue their endeavors over the coming decades when their very own financial infrastructure is falling apart.

The genie is now out of the bottle. People now know they can mount opposition. It is going to take a whole lot more than what they had Saturday; however, their (and our) resolve will continue to ascend, while the resolve of a financially failing government will decline.

I hope so. But, you and I both know that if the feds use the full complement of their weaponry, they can squash these guys like little bugs.

The key, I would think, is to get the word out more so that the public realizes what is going on. The one thing the feds can't afford is for a mass awakening.
 
Yes he has. Many times,, any time anyone even mentions the proper and rightful use of the 2nd amendment.

It was the arms that backed off the BLM..
Not the unarmed protesters.

They tazed them. They sicked dogs on them. and would kill them without blinking.

It was the force of arms.. the rifles that surrounded them that caused them to back off and to surrender the stolen cattle.

Absolutely.
(not my video)
 
I hope so. But, you and I both know that if the feds use the full complement of their weaponry, they can squash these guys like little bugs.

NO,, they can't. They can kill some,, and that will recruit dozens more for every one they kill.

I was listening to Police broadcasts. They knew they were targeted.

There were a thousand rifles there that day,, not all of them visible, They KNEW of 200 scoped rifles,, plus more long guns in the crowd.

There were three different groups of 100 bikes inbound,, and credible intel of 3000 more militia in route.

They were massively out gunned.

and they will be back as soon as their arrogance gets the best of them.
 
Last edited:
I hope so. But, you and I both know that if the feds use the full complement of their weaponry, they can squash these guys like little bugs.

The key, I would think, is to get the word out more so that the public realizes what is going on. The one thing the feds can't afford is for a mass awakening.

With the instant communication available today and the general discord in society it's very likely that there'd be 10 men take the place of every one that fell due to fed weaponry..

The feds can boast those numbers about twice then the tide turns....

You can bet they've run all the simulations over and over but the big variable is how fed up the populace is.....
 
Ron Paul's statement on the whole affair

Ron Paul’s Reaction to the Standoff in Nevada with Federal Officials

April 14, 2014 – I’ve had a lot of questions asked of me about the episode out in Nevada. I was happy to hear about the federal officials backing off because I was concerned that violence might break out. In many ways, the people spoke out after determining that the federal government had overstepped itself and fortunately their presence did not result in violence. However, I worry about whether or not this is all over because you have the sort of on-again, off-again situation like that of Waco which, of course, ended in violence. I’m hoping that the federal officials don’t come back determined to use violence to remove this family from this house and this land.

This is a typical example of when everyone owns a piece of land and no one does all at the same time. They sort of have an agreement – a lease – where they have been raising cattle on this land for 130 years then all of sudden the rules change. This type of problem wouldn’t happen in Texas because all the land is owned privately. Its makes the point that no one really knows who is in charge. It makes the point that state and private ownership would have prevented this type of problem.

There’s two things that come out of this: one, when the American people speak out, their voices can be heard and can effect what government is doing. Two, it empathizes the value of private property and ownership rather than having collective ownership by a government.

As much as I’d like to see this as a victory for the people, I’m afraid the government has more guns, more power and more determination to express their authoritarianism. They will be back and that means a confrontation between the people and those in our government undermining our liberties – the confrontation will continue.

http://www.ronpaulchannel.com/edito...BG&utm_medium=Social&utm_campaign=DailyUpdate
 
Back
Top