Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher

It's All rigged, bribed, bought, collaboration, coercion, subversion, racketeering, influence, corruption

Evidence of BLM’s Deadly Abuse of Animals Taken from Bundy Ranch


Campaign donors, politicians behind Searchlight wind project
Duke Energy, Sen. Reid play major role as wind-turbine farm imposed on community

April 2001, then-Sen. Harry Reid, a Searchlight native, wrote a letter to the Searchlight Town Advisory Board arguing against a proposed gas fire-powered plant asserting that it would “ruin” views of Searchlight’s natural beauty.
January 2013, “I recognize that the proposed wind project in Searchlight has elicited strong opinions in favor and in opposition from residents and non-residents of Nevada,” Reid wrote. “We are fortunate to live in a state that has sunny skies, strong winds, and abundant geothermal resources on lands that when used properly, will provide for us and our children a cleaner and more efficient future that gives Nevada a chance at energy independence.”
Views from Reid’s property, however, won’t be ruined. That’s because when Duke Energy scaled the project down from 161 turbines to 87 turbines, it removed the proposed turbines near Reid’s property on the west side of Searchlight.

http://www.blm.gov/pgdata/etc/media...3 Press Release - Renewable Energy Final .pdf

03-13-13 Press Release - Renewable Energy Final .pdf


Duke Energy has been a major campaign contributor to Reid and other prominent Democrats.

James E. Rogers, Duke Energy’s CEO, has contributed to both parties, but made large donations to support Reid’s effort to keep his majority-leader post in 2010. Reid, in his 2010 re-election campaign, directly received donations of $4,800 from Rogers. The Duke CEO also gave $30,400 to the Senate Democratic Campaign Committee and $30,000 to the Democratic National Committee that year.

In 2012, Duke Energy underwrote the Democratic National Convention held in Charlotte, N.C., where the company is headquartered. Not only was Rogers a co-chair of the convention, personally giving it $339,000, in cash and in-kind services, but Duke Energy also guaranteed a $10 million loan taken out by the Democratic Party to fund the convention — later forgiving the loan and writing it off as a tax-deductible loss.

Duke shareholders thus footed $6 million of the convention’s cost, while U.S. taxpayers were hit for the other $4 million.

The energy giant’s decisions were met with controversy, in part because the DNC had originally banned corporate contributions.

April 2012: Bloomberg reports Solar Jobs Join Harry Reid to Chinese Billionaire in Price Drop

A Chinese billionaire is teaming up with the most powerful man in the U.S. Senate to build a solar plant in a dusty corner of Nevada, even as officials accuse China of driving energy companies out of business by dumping cheap components on the American market.
ENN Group (ENNGZ) plans a manufacturing and generating facility worth $5 billion, more than all Chinese investment in the U.S. combined last year, in Laughlin, Nevada,

Company founder Wang Yusuo, one of China’s richest men, has joined with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid to win incentives including land 113 miles (182 kilometers) southeast of Las Vegas that ENN is buying for $4.5 million, or less than one-eighth of the $38.6 million assessors say it is worth. The project has produced legal work for Reid’s son, Rory, a lawyer at a Las Vegas firm that gave the Nevada Democrat more than $40,000 in the past three election cycles.

Washington Times: What did Harry Reid know and when did he know it?

Clinton/Obama cronies behind Bundy showdownHigh-level Democrats positioned to profit from 'green' projects
Reid had lobbied heavily for the company’s business, even traveling to China. Reid’s son, Rory Reid, formerly a Clark County commissioner, became a lobbyist for ENN, and the Senate majority leader’s former senior adviser, Neil Kornze, now leads the BLM.


Don't forget this jackass, "If you're coming to Bunkerville, Make Funeral Plans"

Clark County Commissioner Tom Collins
dc3_bor.jpg

Tom Collins
 
Last edited:
A carload of drunken hippies came by and started taunting them?

 
Campaign donors, politicians behind Searchlight wind project
Duke Energy, Sen. Reid play major role as wind-turbine farm imposed on community

I would be more surprised if Duke Energy didn't have their grubby fingers in this somewhere.

Don't forget this jackass, "If you're coming to Bunkerville, Make Funeral Plans"

Clark County Commissioner Tom Collins
dc3_bor.jpg

Tom Collins

LOL yeah, that guy. Make funeral plans. Hold a funeral in effigy to vote this bum out of office.
 
I would be more surprised if Duke Energy didn't have their grubby fingers in this somewhere.



LOL yeah, that guy. Make funeral plans. Hold a funeral in effigy to vote this bum out of office.

It seems that the whole local governance is in need of a diaper change.

They need a new Sheriff,, and this guys gotta go.

I hope there are some local folks that can step up.
 
D'Souza will be at ranch:

[video]http://www.dineshdsouza.com/archives/news/dsouza-live-bundy-ranch-tonight-kelly-file/[/video]
 
It's a little too much to follow all of these threads. Seems to me that this issue is a simple one that can be concisely summarized in a couple or three threads. It seems to be economics, pure and simple. The solar companies have simply transferred responsibility of the land they took and transferred it to adjacent land. This is what they are calling secondary mitigation.

Solar project construction would, for instance, destroy water sources for wildlife to drink. Hence, this prompts Wildlife News to write: "This is called 'secondary mitigation.' Wildlife mitigation is things like planting grass wildlife need or like, development of new water sources for wildlife to drink, and restoration of rangeland overgrazed by cattle."

It seems to me that these solar projects are actually destroying land. They are attempting to offset this destruction by creating these secondary mitigation areas. That means that solar companies have simply used land, destroyed land, and then decree THAT PEOPLE IN ADJACENT (secondary) AREAS ARE NOW RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND THAT THE SOLAR COMPANIES USED FOR THEIR OWN GAIN. INSTEAD OF RANCHERS PROFITING--ANOTHER COMPANY IS NOW PROFITING!

It seems to me that there is no conspiracy here. Solar companies and their minions are just transferring responsibility to people who have nothing do with these projects and people (like Bundy) who are outside the areas of construction.

I could be wrong, but this is what jumps out to me.
 
Simply Outstanding!

We know and understand how these agencies and politicians rigged the system and competely screw property rights as well as create a dictatorial environment that no one can challenge without huge costs, live under due to it crippling burdens and costs, plus the regulations and restrictions, which are INTENTIONAL, passed to Rule and Control states/property with immunity!

The Game is purposely rigged in this FASCIST government that's FOR SALE & FOR THEIR PROFIT!
 
Last edited:
Hollywood, post #961's first link needs fixed.

Has there been any pictures posted of the grave the Bundys found, the cattle shot from above, etc. or was the link that was posted going to that?

I don't have much time to spare to keep up with every page.
 
LQjIrru.jpg


That'll be you and me some day soon, if there is not a stop put to this nonsense, and right fucking quick.
 
Last edited:
A Rancher chimes in:

"There have been a lot of people criticizing Clive Bundy because he did not pay his grazing fees for 20 years. The public is also probably wondering why so many other cowboys are supporting Mr. Bundy even though they paid their fees and Clive did not. What you people probably do not realize is that on every rancher's grazing permit it says the following: "You are authorized to make grazing use of the lands, under the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Land Management and covered by this grazing permit, upon your acceptance of the terms and conditions of this grazing permit and payment of grazing fees when due." The "mandatory" terms and conditions go on to list the allotment, the number and kind of livestock to be grazed, when the permit begins and ends, the number of active or suspended AUMs (animal units per month), etc. The terms and conditions also list specific requirements such as where salt or mineral supplements can be located, maximum allowable use of forage levels (40% of annual growth), etc., and include a lot more stringent policies that must be adhered to. Every rancher must sign this "contract" agreeing to abide by the TERMS AND CONDITIONS before he or she can make payment. In the early 90s, the BLM went on a frenzy and drastically cut almost every rancher's permit because of this desert tortoise issue, even though all of us ranchers knew that cow and desert tortoise had co-existed for a hundred+ years. As an example, a family friend had his permit cut by 90%. For those of you who are non ranchers, that would be equated to getting your paycheck cut 90%. In 1976 there were approximately 52 ranching permittees in this area of Nevada. Presently, there are 3. Most of these people lost their livelihoods because of the actions of the BLM. Clive Bundy was one of these people who received extremely unfair and unreasonable TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

Keep in mind that Mr. Bundy was required to sign this contract before he was allowed to pay. Had Clive signed on the dotted line, he would have, in essence, signed his very livelihood away. And so Mr. Bundy took a stand, not only for himself, but for all of us. He refused to be destroyed by a tyrannical federal entity and to have his American liberties and freedoms taken away. Also keep in mind that all ranchers financially paid dearly for the forage rights those permits allow - - not rights to the land, but rights to use the forage that grows on that land. Many of these AUMS are water based, meaning that the rancher also has a vested right (state owned, not federal) to the waters that adjoin the lands and allow the livestock to drink. These water rights were also purchased at a great price. If a rancher cannot show beneficial use of the water (he must have the appropriate number of livestock that drinks and uses that water), then he loses that water right. Usually water rights and forage rights go hand in hand. Contrary to what the BLM is telling you, they NEVER compensate a rancher for the AUMs they take away. Most times, they tell ranchers that their AUMS are "suspended," but not removed. Unfortunately, my family has thousands of "suspended" AUMs that will probably never be returned. And so, even though these ranchers throughout the course of a hundred years invested thousands(and perhaps millions) of dollars and sacrificed along the way to obtain these rights through purchase from others, at a whim the government can take everything away with the stroke of a pen. This is the very thing that Clive Bundy single handedly took a stand against. Thank you, Clive, from a rancher who considers you a hero."


I've been looking for this tidbit that AuH20 posted. I wanted to study it a little more since it seemed to say so much. Like maybe they wouldn't cash his checks because he wouldn't sign. ?


This isn't the source. It does have another link. Maybe it will get us somewhere.

http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2014/04/why-clive-bundy-isnt-wrong-regarding-grazing-2938622.html
 
Last edited:
Back
Top