Are You a Trump supporter?

[phill4paul]

You're promoting Madison Ave transhumanism on this site now? Shame on you, Bruce.

Trump. Trump. Trump. Trump. I can't hear you..Trump Trump Trump..what were you saying about...Trump. Trump. Trump. Madison Ave...Trump. Trump. Trump.

 

[openfire]

It's just pixels on the screen. Go for it. The entertainment value is priceless compared to a couple small green knobs.

How does the rep system here work... does one "+ rep" negate one "- rep"?

 

[phill4paul]

How does the rep system here work... does one "+ rep" negate one "- rep"?

Does one + rep for Trump negate one - rep for Hillary?

 

[CPUd]

A + rep for Trump == a + rep for Hillary.

 

[CPUd]

I believe there is a transitive property as well.

A + rep for Hillary == a - rep for liberty.

Therefore,
A + rep for Trump == a - rep for liberty.

QED motherfuckers!

 

[MrGoose]

He is fucking over the GOP hard... So yes.

 

[francisco]

Didn't someone say there were only 5 people here who didn't support Trump?

You have a higher chance of being sent to a gulog with Trump more so than any other candidate. All you who like to pretend you know what Trump will do as POTUS are completely fooling yourselves. The fact is no one has even the SLIGHTEST idea what this man would do. He has no ideology, no philosophy. He hasn't even thought about most political issues of our day. He's been on every side of every issue, all in a relatively short period of time. He has no history to back anything he says up, in fact, just the opposite.

Trump supporters are delusional. The Trump supporters on RPF are even more delusional than the average Trump supporter considering they've at least been exposed to a true liberty philosophy. The best thing that could happen in him winning is my returning to the forum in 4 years to see which of you are still singing this tune.

Trump appeals to the lowest common denominator. At least he's doing us a favor in pointing them out.

BTW, don't let these Trump supporters on RPF fool you. Most of them actively sought to sow division among those of us who supported Rand in his board. Most were never on board with the liberty candidate this race to begin with. When asked why, they would provide some stupid statement like "Rand is establishment", or "Rand endorsed McConnell". All the while they supported Trump and did their best to subterfuge any positivity in regards to Rand's race.

QFT

Seconded.

Although in regard to

The best thing that could happen in [Trump] winning is my returning to the forum in 4 years to see which of you are still singing this tune.

if Trump is elected, there's a good chance that sites like this will be labelled "subversive" and will no longer exist aboveground. Participating in any underground version would land you in a gulag.

 

[susano]

I'm voting for him. He holds some views that are atrocious (torture, "taking the oil" in Iraq, praises the police - ugh) and some others I'm on board with (wars of aggression, good attitude toward Russia, regime change, trade agreements, borders, forcing corporate money back and with it, jobs, political correctness/thought control, etc). The main reason I'm voting for him is because he's the wrecking ball that is destroying the neocon stranglehold on the Republican party. Ron Paul couldn't do it and I accept that Donald Trump can and is. He's exposed the fact that there is no difference between the parties with so many Rs saying they'd rather have Hillary. I detest the juvenile shit that he's said (over and over). I hate that he never really fleshes out how he plans to accomplish certain things. I think he can destroy Hillary if he doesn't do something to completely discredit himself like shoot someone in Times Square, lol. I do think he's sincere about wanting to "make America great again". Can he? Dunno but I'm giddy at the destruction of the neocons.

 

[ProBlue33]

33.33%

That is the percent that support Trump that used to support the Pauls, I know that is more than McCain or Romney, especially Romney after what he did to Ron.

 

[Dianne]

33.33%

That is the percent that support Trump that used to support the Pauls, I know that is more than McCain or Romney, especially Romney after what he did to Ron.

I don't believe anyone on rpf cast a vote for Romney or McCain. Two of the most hated people on this forum lol.

 

[kahless]

Beat her a "little" bit.
or
Bruise the fuck out of her.

Your choice. Lesser of two evils. Choose mother fucker. How do you want to beat your wife?

The fact is Hillary is campaigning to effectively put gun manufacturers out of business and curtail gun ownership. The choices on the Republican side are horrible, everyone here knows this but at least the 2nd amendment is not an issue among other things.

You lose your 2nd amendment rights then we will never be able to recover then one day they will no longer fear the populace altogether.

So your description is accurate and sure allot of us are choosing to be beaten less since they hold all the cards and it is strategically the only choice right now.

I do not see anyone here an ardent Trump or Cruz supporter for that matter. It is all in your head since you are delusional in your hatred of Trump.

 

[Murrika]

Of course I would support Rand, but Rand dissapeared. Let's stick it to the GOP with Trump.

 

[Christian Liberty]

I'm meeting with him tomorrow so I'll run it past him. His animus towards Sanders is largely rooted in the socialism thing and what it represents, not to mention he utterly loathes Sanders' supporters (one of his sons' in-laws is a Sanders supporter and he's one of these "Save the world but screw my dying mom" types).

I dislike Sanders and his socialism, the thingg is that Sanders seems more predictable to me in that Trump seems lhe wants and why he wants it. Trump seems like more of a loose cannon.

I think I should probably let him speak for himself regarding a lot of the other points regarding Trump. As to his views on Orthodoxy, the key thing here is the Steelite component rather than the generic "covenanter" label, though Jim would assert that one can't be a covenanter while rejecting the position that Steel and Lusk held regarding the American church, as it was the originalist view regarding the stance of the covenanted church of Scotland.

Why would this affect your understanding of te Eastern Orthodox though?

Personally, every time I hear Cruz speak I get a "bad used car salesman" vibe from him. As for why my pastor would lean more towards Trump than Cruz, part of it is a matter of the former being more electable nationally and better capable of growing the GOP, thus staving off the progression of the political left. Another part of it would be that he's not fond of Baptists, particularly ones that lean Pentecostal

I'm not a big fan of baptists either but Trump is in no way a real Presbyterian. He's a strip club owner and a racist and for torturing more people and for eminent domain and for "universal health care." Cruz at least seems to genuinely believe in the defective form of Christainity he says he does, Trump is no more Presbyterian than the pope is actually the holy father. I have to admit I'm a little disappointed that Dodson prefers him, though perhaps he knows something I don't. From what I know of him he seems like a smart fellow, far more intelligent than anyone I know of that likes Trump, hence my curiosity, regarding the rationale.

 

[fcreature]

The fact is Hillary is campaigning to effectively put gun manufacturers out of business and curtail gun ownership. The choices on the Republican side are horrible, everyone here knows this but at least the 2nd amendment is not an issue among other things.

You lose your 2nd amendment rights then we will never be able to recover then one day they will no longer fear the populace altogether.

So your description is accurate and sure allot of us are choosing to be beaten less since they hold all the cards and it is strategically the only choice right now.

I do not see anyone here an ardent Trump or Cruz supporter for that matter. It is all in your head since you are delusional in your hatred of Trump.

Are you saying that if Hillary were elected that there would be a good chance of us losing our second amendment rights?

No politician on either side will be able to touch gun ownership in this country right now. No one. Maybe in 50 or 100 years it will be possible, but certainly not right now. Guns are one issue where Americans don't fuck around. Sure, there is a very vocal minority opinion but that's all it will ever be.

 

[Christian Liberty]

One of my friends says: "Cruz might be baptist leaning pentecostal but Trump is Presbyterian leaning Satanist."

 

[willwash]

Since it is all about deal making with Congress the end result in 4 years might very well look the same. It took the Progressives a 100 years to get to where we are now so we will need successive administrations in both parties and Congress to incrementally roll it back.

That's not how growth and reduction in government works. It's a slow buildup until sudden collapse and revolution. We've never seen a slow incremental rollback in the scope of government

 

[LifeLibertyPursuit]

Not a supporter but enjoying the carnage though. He is going to be 70, he just wants to cement his legacy.

 

[kahless]

Are you saying that if Hillary were elected that there would be a good chance of us losing our second amendment rights?

No politician on either side will be able to touch gun ownership in this country right now. No one. Maybe in 50 or 100 years it will be possible, but certainly not right now. Guns are one issue where Americans don't fuck around. Sure, there is a very vocal minority opinion but that's all it will ever be.

She wants to pass legislation that will effectively put gun dealers and manufacturers out of business. We know how the Democrats in Congress will vote. It will be the weak Republicans that reach across the isle to give the Democrats the votes they need to pass this.

https://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/gun-violence-prevention/

Repeal the gun industry’s unique immunity protection. Hillary believes the gun industry must be held accountable for violence perpetrated with their guns. Hillary will lead the charge to repeal the so-called “Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act,” a dangerous law that prevents victims of gun violence from holding negligent manufacturers and dealers accountable for violence perpetrated with their guns.

Revoke the licenses of bad-actor dealers. Hillary believes we must do more to crack down on gun stores that flood our communities with illegal guns. As president, she will provide funding to increase inspections and aggressively enforce current law by revoking the licenses of dealers that knowingly supply straw purchasers and traffickers.

Besides these two points I pulled out of that page just take a look at that very long page of items infringing on the 2nd amendment.

 

[thoughtomator]

One of my friends says: "Cruz might be baptist leaning pentecostal but Trump is Presbyterian leaning Satanist."

Cruz is full blown Satanist not leaning anywhere, he's literally married to The Beast.

 

[Todd]

Good grief the IQ of this place has dropped like 40 points in the last 8 months. There once was a time when we talked about ideas and truthers and anarchists etc actually discussed things. Now this place sounds like My junior high school study hall.