Are Truthers a liability?

Ridiculous

Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2007
Messages
1,148
Are Truther grassroots activists a liability to the Campaign.

Are the truthers hurting the campaign with New World Order nonsense?

Yes the average American has some questions about 9/11, but I also think that the average American views that the "9/11 was an inside job" truthers as nut jobs.

I also think that if Paul were to get the nomination, he should stop giving interviews with people like Alex Jones. Jones, while probably sincere, is also a business man making money off of Truther's fears.... It really isn't a whole lot different than Giuliani being a 9/11 profiteer


I personally share Ron Paul's official position on 9/11.
 
I don't share his opinion but it matters not. But then again, i also don't believe in the easter bunny.
 
Ho, hum, yet again. How about in Hot Topics, and with a title of 'I am a diversive prig starting another flame war'. :(
 
I have always said they were for the reason that their notions will cause less people to vote for Ron Paul. They have no reason to mix their "truth" message with the campaign.
 
Since something like 30% of America suspects that 9/11 was done by an internal US conspiracy, and 70% suspect that the Iraq war was a lie based on 9/11 I think we'll be ok.

The liability we have with them is belligerent action and racist kooks. But whatever, these people have the right to believe what is the truth even if their methods are abrasive.
 
They have the right to believe whatever they want. But it is they that got Paul associated with the "tin foil hat", not the moderate republicans, rational libertarians and convert dems.
 
Are Truther grassroots activists a liability to the Campaign.

Are the truthers hurting the campaign with New World Order nonsense?

Yes the average American has some questions about 9/11, but I also think that the average American views that the "9/11 was an inside job" truthers as nut jobs.

I also think that if Paul were to get the nomination, he should stop giving interviews with people like Alex Jones. Jones, while probably sincere, is also a business man making money off of Truther's fears.... It really isn't a whole lot different than Giuliani being a 9/11 profiteer


I personally share Ron Paul's official position on 9/11.


If exposing the IRREFUTABLE TRUTH about 9/11 (an inside job, US & Israel) makes us "nut jobs" in the eyes of the "average American", then perhaps the "average American" is beyond hope.


If you insist on burying your head in the sand about 9/11, thats your right. But where do you get off labeling us as "nuts" when I guaran-damn-tee you that you havent done any research into the matter yourself.

has it ever occured to you that if the mass media can blackout so much good news about Ron Paul (95%of Americans have never heard of him!)...that they could just as easily cover up the facts of 9/11?...THINK ABOUT IT!


try and refute this... www.911truthvirus.com
 
If pursuing the IRREFUTABLE TRUTH about 9/11 makes us "nut jobs" in the eues of the "average American"


No, it's acting like a "nut job" about truth that makes you into or appear as a nut job.

Just sayin. :cool:
 
If exposing the IRREFUTABLE TRUTH about 9/11 (an inside job, US & Israel) makes us "nut jobs" in the eyes of the "average American", then perhaps the "average American" is beyond hope.


If you insist on burying your head in the sand about 9/11, thats your right. But where do you get off labeling us as "nuts" when I guaran-damn-tee you that you havent done any research into the matter yourself.

has it ever occured to you that if the mass media can blackout so much good news about Ron Paul (95%of Americans have never heard of him!)...that they could just as easily cover up the facts of 9/11?...THINK ABOUT IT!


try and refute this... www.911truthvirus.com


But Ron Paul doesnt believe 911 was an inside job. Isnt he just "burrying his head in the sand" with his nutty ideas about some made up word called "blowback" ?

So why do you support him?
 
They are Americans and they have every right to support any candidate they want. The more we start pushing that point the better off everyone will be.

I may not agree with their views but I'll most certainly defend their right to support Ron and I happily welcome their hard work.

P.s. If a flame war starts in this thread I'll move it but I want visitors to read some of the points in the thread. Really think about what people are saying when they say a candidate should distance themselves from members of the voting public. Is this something we really want to indorse? I say no.
 
But Ron Paul doesnt believe 911 was an inside job. Isnt he just "burrying his head in the sand" with his nutty ideas about some made up word called "blowback" ?

So why do you support him?

Perhaps it's because 9/11 truth isn't the only issue they're thinking about...

I'm not sold on the gold standard but I still support Ron.
 
I dont see them as a liability, but I dont see why anyone would waste their time on 911 truth unless they personaly plan on going to washington DC to make the ones they feel responsible pay for their crimes. Its like playing video games, sure its fun, but nothing substantial will ever come out of it.
 
The recent History Channel 9/11 Conspiracy Theory special said that 33% of Americans believe that the government is covering up details about 9/11.
I'd be thrilled if that 33% all voted for Ron Paul.
Take your support where you can get it.

eb
 
no

All voices have people who don't agree with them. I've personaly seen truthers, white supremist, people who advocate dog fighting, old school republicans, libertarians, and countless other groups who for the most part just want to be left alone. Freedom attracts all types of people. You don't vote for the people who support Ron Paul you vote for Ron Paul.

Tucker
just did a segment strippers for Ron Paul.
 
The recent History Channel 9/11 Conspiracy Theory special said that 33% of Americans believe that the government is covering up details about 9/11.
I'd be thrilled if that 33% all voted for Ron Paul.
Take your support where you can get it.

eb

People should support Ron Paul because he believes in the constitution, not because they believe 911 was an inside job. After all, what does 911 have to do with Ron Paul? I mean, thats great that they support him, but how are the two connected?

I like feta cheese, but I dont connect my love of feta cheese to the Ron Paul campaign and wear a "feta cheese lover for Ron Paul" shirt. If you wanna do that, fine, I just dont see how the two have anything at all to do with each other.

33% of people love feta cheese and I would be thrilled if all 33% voted for Ron Paul.:D no connection
 
Last edited:
Truther is truth or thruther is false - why does it make any differnce at all, we all should for godness sakes support Ron Paul
 
Back
Top