Truth Warrior
Banned
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2007
- Messages
- 18,789
PRO ........... taking personal responsibilty and accountability on PREVENTING unwanted pregnancies! Turning a problem into a non-problem. 

There is no such thing as Pro-Life and Pro-Choice. You cannot simplify people's position on this issue down to a little catch phrase. As a veterinary student I understand the complexity of ontogeny. It is not a matter of black and white. The Pro-Life and Pro-Choice designations are designed to cause divisiveness, as is the false left-right paradigm.
The fact is you have to look at each situation individually.
Obviously, if a women is raped, abortion is justified because there has been an incursion on the women's liberty. However, even in this situation, I think we have to accept that any case of abortion is killing a human being. The ontogenic process is one which is continuous and linear in complexity. There is no distinct point at which a something suddenly changes from a cluster of cells to a human being. I think people want to believe this is the case to justify their abortions. They are wrong. If you say an abortion is morally justifiable in any case, up to day 14, then why not day 15, and if day 15 then why not day 16 and so on. The fact is that ontogenic development is a continuous process. Any distinct point that is designated as a so-called cut-off point of morality is simply arbitrary. Life does begin at conception. Accept it.
On the other hand I think if a man and a women go for a roll in the hay because they got drunk at a party, I don't think abortion is justified in that situation. Also keep in mind that I think the newly created human being is the responsibility of both the male and female who participated in the act. The question is then, of course, whether legislation should be used to protect the human being inside the women. Personally I don't think creating a law that makes performing abortions illegal, is going to help the situation. If a women does not want the baby then there is a humane issue for that baby, not only during ontogeny (if the women tries to peform abort the baby by non-conventional means), but following birth.
It certainly is a tough issue. I think the philosophy of small government and individual responsibility will greatly reduce the number of abortions that occur. People have become reliant on government to tell them what is right and wrong, therefore they have lost their sense of self-responsibility. I think if responsibility returned to the individual in other areas, then it is more likely people will take more responsibility in their sexual behaviour. They will be more caring and concerned and so abortions will naturally reduce.
On the other hand, if you make abortions legal in a welafare-warfare state, you end up with an awful sitatuation of people not taking reponsibility, and rather thinking abortions are fine because the goverment said so and never doing your their research.
PRO ........... taking personal responsibilty and accountability on PREVENTING unwanted pregnancies! Turning a problem into a non-problem.![]()
Anti-abortion.
The main reason I'm pro-choice is because of the ethical issue.
I'd rather abortions be safe, legal, and rare instead of unsafe, unregulated, and done on a whim.
ditto thatThe main reason I'm pro-choice is because of the ethical issue.
I'd rather abortions be safe, legal, and rare instead of unsafe, unregulated, and done on a whim.
It is also a "relic" of those who believe in the principle that government does have the responsibility to protect everyone's right to LIFE, liberty and the pursuit of happiness at ALL STAGES OF OUR EXISTENCE. (Conception until death)"Pro life" is mainly a relic of religion. Funny that most "pro lifers" do not apply the same views when it comes to the death penalty.
pro-choice
You can't stop abortions. Outlawing abortions would be about as effective as outlawing drugs.
pro-choice
You can't stop abortions. Outlawing abortions would be about as effective as outlawing drugs.