Justin is too fickle to be taken seriously by anyone anymore which is a shame because when he's right, he's REALLY REALLY right. However when he's wrong, it's really bad.
Raimondo criticized Rand Paul for sounding entirely too much like people from the other party. He seemed to think that anyone who sounds that partisan, and is from the 'other side', is beyond salvage and cannot change. But, you know, at least Raimondo has enough sense to allow people from the 'other side' to change for the better. In a world where the powers that be depend upon our petty differences over inconsequential things to keep us divided and conquered, such flexibility and the ability to keep a mind open just enough to admit further evidence is admirable.
What's
your excuse? You
like us being divided and conquered? Because this 'once a liberal, either always a liberal or a flip flopper' stuff sure helps them screw us over.
Without the Decoder Ring, it's impossible to tell what Rand really means it when he says "an attack on Israel will be treated as an attack on the U.S."
Well, let's see. Last time the U.S. was attacked, it kicked two completely unrelated nations' asses with no appreciable amount of help from anyone whatsoever required except for the rather mandatory use of some neighborhood airfields.
I can see Israel attacking the right nation, instead of two of the wrong ones. But otherwise, I expect pretty much the same from them. They wouldn't need our help and I feel fairly sure they'd ask us to butt out.
It doesn't matter if he's flat out wrong half the time. It's like AJ, half of what he puts out is hyperbole, innuendo, and just factual untruths. It makes it too hard to separate the crap from the good stuff, and it prohibits any ounce of credibility.
Oh? And would you care to get specific with these charges? Or would you prefer to maintain this level of ignorance? One would think that you'd have learned by now that if you want to maintain a silly attitude around here, you should keep it a secret.
In any case, Rand is about to be beseiged by tools posing as journalists from both sides of the 'aisle', even the ones like Krauthammer who now have to contradict the snot out of their previous statements about him and their knee-jerk reactions to the filibuster. If you're trying to ingratiate yourself to Rand Paul, you're not helping yourself by criticizing those who are honest enough to say nice things about him.
No, Rand is not an interventionist. Where do people get these lies from?
Huh. 'An attack on Israel would be treated as an attack on the U.S.' doesn't sound even remotely interventionalist to you? What would sound interventionalist to you? Is he not interventionalist until he orders an IRS office set up within their borders?
