Anti-Fracking Protests Planned; Fracking: Good or Bad?

FrankRep

Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2007
Messages
28,885
Anti-Fracking Protests Planned; Fracking: Good or Bad?


Stop Agenda 21 in Texas
Sept. 22, 2012


Global Protests Planned Over Gas Drilling Process

Associated Press
Sept. 22, 2012

PITTSBURGH (AP) — More than 100 protests against the natural gas drilling process known as fracking are planned across the globe on Saturday, and organizers are using an overly simplified message to draw people out and spur outrage.

The GlobalFrackdown website that’s promoting the protests claims the process “pollutes water and makes people sick.” There is disagreement among scientists about the risks.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and many state regulators contend that fracking can be done safely. They say the boom in natural gas production has created jobs and lowered prices for industry and consumers.

The American Lung Association says natural gas has helped reduce air pollution as many dirtier coal-fired power plants shift to natural gas.

Protests are planned in cities that include Pittsburgh, New York, Paris and Madrid.​



==================


Video: Chesapeake Energy – How Fracking Works



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KN3NjMFhWp4



Natural Gas — Yours for the Fracking


Wresting natural gas via fracking from tight shale formations a mile underground is one of man’s greatest accomplishments, and one that promises abundant, clean fuel for a century or more.​


The New American
10 June 2011



At first glance the concepts of horizontal drilling for oil and natural gas and hydraulic fracturing, a method of extracting oil and gas from tight shale formations, seem physically impossible. But tens of thousands of gas wells already using this revolutionary technology prove otherwise. Hydraulic fracturing of underground wells is not a new idea, having been used for about a century to increase flow in water wells. When formations are “tight” or clogged, reversing the flow temporarily with high pressure from inside the well often allows more flow. But there, the similarity with today’s technology ends.

Known as “fracking” (pronounced FRăK-ing), the process begins with a large diameter hole (about 20 inches) drilled and cased to a depth of 18 to 20 feet. This “cellar” keeps the bore hole from collapsing in the soft earth and keeps groundwater out while serving as short-term reservoir for overflows of drilling and fracking fluids. A rotary drill of up to 12 inches then begins to grind out a vertical well with tungsten carbide tips. Air is pumped down the drill stem to cool the bit and force cuttings to the surface.

The initial hole is drilled to a depth several hundred feet below any freshwater zones. (Most residential wells are less than 150 feet deep, while commercial and municipal wells are usable to about 400 feet.) A surface casing is then inserted in the bore hole, and concrete is pumped down to a shoe at the bottom which forces the concrete back up the annulus between the bore hole and the casing. This concrete-enclosed casing isolates the well from the potable aquifers and also keeps the groundwater and loose debris from contaminating the well.

A smaller bit drills through the concrete, continuing downward. Drilling mud, a high-density slurry, is pumped down the drill stem to cool the bit and force rock cuttings to the surface. So far, the process is identical to drilling a conventional gas or oil well.

But fracking gives a twist to the traditional process, literally. At about 500 to 600 feet above the shale formation of interest, at a point called the kickoff point (KOP) or heel, a “Measurement While Drilling” (MWD) motor is inserted in the bore hole and forces the bit off line. It traces an arc, entering the shale formation in a horizontal plane known as a lateral. The lateral continues on several thousand feet to the end of the shaft, known as the toe. Production casing is inserted and concreted in place, as was the surface casing. After pressure testing to several thousand pounds per square inch, the large drilling rig is disassembled, cleaned, and sent to another site where it will repeat the 10- to 14-day drilling process. The remaining work will be done by a smaller platform known as a workover rig.

To punch holes through the casing and concrete, and into the shale formation, a perf gun using multiple shaped charges is lowered and fired electrically. This operation, known as the wireline, begins at the toe and is done in increments of about 500 feet. Now the fun begins.

Fracking

If you’ve had the opportunity to drive a car made before 1930, you know how much force it takes to apply the brakes, given the lever-and-cable system used to force the brake shoe against the drum. The hydraulic brake allowed the automobile operator to do what seems quite anti-intuitive. By stepping on the pedal attached to a lever that pushes a plunger, hundreds of pounds per square inch of pressure are produced in the hydraulic cylinder containing brake fluid. As if by magic this pressure is conveyed to each of the wheel cylinders, thereby “applying the brakes” with little strain on the driver.

Hydraulic fracturing uses the same principle, though in this case the brake pedal is a group of large-capacity, high-pressure, diesel-powered pumps. The brake fluid is akin to one million gallons of water treated with certain chemicals and sufficient proppants — usually sand or spherical ceramic materials — used to prop open perforations formed in the shale by the perf gun and enlarged by hydraulic fracturing. The “brake cylinders” are the fissures in the shale where the pumps transfer tremendous pressure, widening the cracks so gas can flow into the production casing.

After one section is fracked, workers plug it so hydraulic pressure can be concentrated in the next section. The process begins at the toe and moves toward the heel. The last step is to remove all plugs so that the remaining fracking fluid flows out. Crews install a six-foot Christmas tree, as the valves and blow-out protectors are called, something of an icon to all the ingenuity and effort that has taken place more than a mile below the surface. The well is now ready to produce clean, abundant energy without which our civilization would soon slide back into the days of human hardship and misery, with lives that are short and brutal.

The Shale Gas “Plays”

You may have noticed that the natural-gas drilling and production industry has its share of special expressions, such as fracing, proppants, and wireline. Another word for what most of us would call fields (as in “oil fields”) is the play.

The first natural gas play was the Barnett Shale in north central Texas, where drilling began in 1981. Sixteen years of experimenting with the hydraulic fracturing process resulted in 404 minimally producing wells. As fracing was perfected and teamed with horizontal drilling in 2003, new wells were added by the thousands. Today, the Barnett Shale boasts about 13,000 producing wells.

The Bakken/Spanish/Three Forks Play located in Montana, North Dakota, and Saskatchewan (shown on the EIA map on page 12 as the Williston Basin) is currently the most active. Tiny Eagle Ford Play in south Texas along the Rio Grande runs a close second due to higher natural porosity than other formations. The huge Marcellus Play in the northeastern United States is third, but is a relatively untapped resource due to the unwillingness of the New York state government to allow its citizens to participate in selling what is unquestionably their property. Rounding out the top four is the Haynesville/Bossier/Cotton Valley Play in northwest Louisiana and east Texas.

Working in the Plays

The Fayetteville Play is a relatively small but active field supporting a booming shale industry in northern Arkansas. Andy and Brook Burton, co-owners of Trident Well Services, recently hosted TNA on a tour of several of its active drilling sites. Walking one of the sites, Andy Burton pointed out the 40 mil polyethylene sheet covering the active drilling area used to prevent any fluids leaking into the ground. It guides any spills or overflows to the cellar where they are contained until being pumped out and recycled. He noted the knee-high berms that keep liquids on the site in the event of accidental spills. Burton’s company is primarily responsible for ensuring that trucks and the drilling rig itself are cleaned before moving to a new location and that the site will meet the white glove test of the most rabid environmentalist when moved into the production phase.

The crews go about their 12-hour workdays with military precision. Regular interactive safety meetings, protective gear, and computer-controlled drilling that gives advance warning before high-pressure venting have lowered the accident rate until oil and gas field work is no longer considered a form of industrial suicide. “Three or four years ago the emphasis was entirely on production,” says Burton, “but today safety and environment concerns determine whether you maintain your MSA.” His reference is to the coveted Master Service Agreement necessary for eligibility to work for major companies such as Southwest Energy and Chesapeake.

The Future of Fracking

Today, the Natural Gas Association estimates that 90 percent of wells drilled today use fracing as a means to increase production. This technology has, in about four years, changed the natural-gas production outlook from what some feared to be a tailing off of production, to what is now known as the shale gale.

Research is under way into re-fracing natural-gas wells and developing even more efficient technology. One interesting new fracing method pioneered by Canada-based Gasfrac Energy Services, Inc. uses gelled propane instead of water as the fracing fluid. Under high pressure, the gel is liquefied and carries the proppants into the shale formation. When pressure is released, the liquid returns to its normal gaseous state. Gasfrac claims that virtually 100 percent of the propane is recovered and that 80 percent of truck traffic to the drilling site is therefore eliminated.

The primary argument by those opposing this ingenious way of bringing a valuable product from formations a mile underground to the surface for our use and comfort is that this activity will contaminate near-surface aquifers. Somehow fracing fluid (known from personal contact to be as bland as dishwater) is going to migrate through 4,000 or more feet of rock, sand, and shale into an aquifer. Or drillers would somehow allow the valuable product they are selling to escape from high-pressure concrete-encased steel casing into a water well. But the whole process is very environmentally friendly, and it’s getting even friendlier by the day.


SOURCE:
http://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/energy/item/7105-natural-gas-—-yours-for-the-fracing
 
Didn't read the article (yet), but all I gotta say is if fracking contaminates the water table/subterranian water ( and above-ground water, for that matter), it most definitely is BAD!
 
Didn't read the article (yet), but all I gotta say is if fracking contaminates the water table/subterranian water ( and above-ground water, for that matter), it most definitely is BAD!

What the truth about Fracking Water contamination?



Firewater and Other Urban Fracking Legends

The New American
13 October 2011

....

Fracking Fluid


Gasland also leads viewers to believe fluids used in the fracking process are exempt from regulations, so companies can use their secret lists of harmful ingredients without regard to public health. Fox says, “The only reason we know anything about the fracking chemicals is because of the work of Theo Colborn,” a noted environmentalist whose résumé includes work for the World Wildlife Fund and advisory roles for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Fox makes the extraordinary claim that Colborn researched fracking fluid by “chasing down trucks, combing through material safety data sheets, and collecting samples.”

Poor thing. She could have saved herself the trouble and downloaded the information from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) website. Or she could have contacted a regulatory agency in any state where fracking takes place, because the fluids are well known and rigorously regulated. “Indeed, the drilling companies do have their ‘formulas’ for the best mix of chemical additives for particular sites,” wrote Ed Hiserodt in “The Coming Shale Gale” (The New American, June 20, 2011), “but the additives themselves are not secret.”

Nor have they ever been. EPA investigations of fracking in Alabama conducted between May 1989 and March 1993 “failed to show any chemicals that would indicate the presence of fracturing fluids” in drinking water. So said Obama’s former “energy czar,” Carol Browner, who was EPA administrator at the time she reported those results. She could not have eliminated the possibility of fracking fluids in the water had she not known what fluids were used.

DOE’s April 2009 document, “Modern Shale Gas Development in the United States: A Primer,” explains, “Water and sand make up over 98% of the fracture fluid, with the rest consisting of various chemical additives that improve the effectiveness of the fracture job.” And even though Fox claims fracking fluid is “a mix of over 596 chemicals,” DOE says that, in addition to the more than 98 percent water and sand mixture, a “typical fracture treatment will use very low concentrations of between 3 and 12 additive chemicals depending on the characteristics of the water and the shale formation being fractured.”

Fox also claims that companies will let the fluid evaporate and contaminate the air once they are done with it. He gives the impression that the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) is at wit’s end dealing with fracking’s threat to air quality standards and soaring ozone levels that “burn holes in your lungs.” On the screen flash phrases from a February 26, 2008 news release: “Air Pollution Advisory in Sublette County,” and “Typically, higher ozone levels occur in large cities.” Then other lines from obviously different documents, with no identifying letterhead or signature, appear: “risk of breathing impairment, infection and even premature death” and “skyrocketed above 100 ppb.”

A better look at the February press release reveals it mentioned nothing about drilling operations at all. Three days later, DEQ lifted the pollution advisory, clarifying, “The ozone advisory was issued because forecasted weather conditions … were favorable for ozone formation. Ozone formation appears to occur in the Basin when there are strong temperature inversions, low winds, snow cover, and bright sunlight. Ozone levels return to normal when any one of those conditions change.”

=========




Fracking in the News:

EPA declares water in Pennsylvania 'fracking' village safe to drink
http://content.usatoday.com/communi...ng-village-water-safe-to-drink/1#.UF34DFG7p0Q

Chris Christie vetoes fracking wastewater ban
http://online.wsj.com/article/AP070bafcb3424410a967ecc0fe54492cb.html

Is Fracking Safe? The Top 10 Myths About Natural Gas Drilling - Popular Mechanics
http://www.popularmechanics.com/sci...-about-natural-gas-drilling-6386593-2#slide-1
 
Last edited:
DOE’s April 2009 document, “Modern Shale Gas Development in the United States: A Primer,” explains, “Water and sand make up over 98% of the fracture fluid ...​


SOURCE:
http://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/energy/item/7112-firewater-and-other-urban-fracing-legends

And? If that 2% was for instance Cyanide, you don't think there would be any negative consequences for those who have to bear the brunt of trespass upon their property?

If they want to frack, they can do so as long as the materials stay on their own property (E.g., just like the plastic tarp layering found in many land fills that keep the garbage contained to their property). You can't wantonly just pour whatever you want into the water table unless you confine it to your own property. If you can't do that, then you have no standing to infringe on the property rights of others, and yes, your pollution is a violation of others property rights.

This should be largely a matter to local courts - but, nuisance laws haven't been in place since the Industrial Revolution thanks to the Fascists.
 
Some more discussion:

http://solutions.bv.com/coexistence-gas-drilling-watershed/

It might be helpful to look at a scale drawing of a typical well, and keep in mind that many equally toxic chemicals already naturally exist in the depth of the fracking, and shallower.

Additionally, many industries have been injecting waste liquids and slurries into the earth for many decades as a means of disposal and many of them are far more toxic than the mixes used in fracking.

Some early shallow gas wells were drilled in Ohio using wooden casing, which as you can imagine had a pretty short life. There are literally hundreds of thousands of old shallow gas wells just in Ohio alone, many dating back to the twenties and steel casings have often rusted away and many wells fill with water, meaning that the petroleum products and water are mixing.

impervious-rock-layers1.png
 
Last edited:
It's possible to be done right but it seems pretty easy to screw stuff up too. The earth's core and crust are powerful enough to crack stuff open and cause leaks.
 
Silly humans thinking they can dump toxic waste on the land, in the oceans and under the land without any negative consequences.....seriously, how detached from nature are people???
 
Your land or mine?

Your seismic zone or mine?

Then again we are all neighbors. It is a wicked experiment at this point.


I'm still waiting for the dividends from my share of the oil pumped out of public reserves.
 
This should be largely a matter to local courts - but, nuisance laws haven't been in place since the Industrial Revolution thanks to the Fascists.

The locals lack the legal muscle to do anything about it. If one man with property damage can afford a $10,000 legal fee to do something about it, the industry can counter with $300,000 in defence all day long.
 
This video seems fake. I have a hard time believing that the public water system in her area doesn't have water filtration.

Its her private well. Filtration doesn't remove dissolved methane. It has to be off gassed. How do you accomplish that on a family well with sub zero winter temperatures?
 
Its her private well. Filtration doesn't remove dissolved methane. It has to be off gassed. How do you accomplish that on a family well with sub zero winter temperatures?

When mistakes happen like non-harmful methane leaks out into private water wells, energy companies Chesapeake seem very willing to help remedy the situation anyway they can.



"According to Penn State and the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, methane does not pose a health risk when present in drinking water,"
- Chesapeake press release​


Methane found in well water in Monroe Twp.

The Daily Review
August 12, 2010


Chesapeake Energy Corp. initiated remedial action Tuesday at its Dan Ellis natural gas well site in Monroe Township after methane was found six days earlier in three private water wells less than a mile away, according to the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection.

The Department of Environmental Protection is investigating whether methane migrated from a Chesapeake Energy well, such as the Dan Ellis well, to the three private water wells, which are located on Brocktown Road in Monroe Township, said Dan Spadoni, a spokesman for the Department of Environmental Protection. Methane is the main component of natural gas, he said.

Spadoni said he believes the remedial action being done by Chesapeake is to address "the cementing operation" at the Dan Ellis 3H well, which is one of three gas wells that have been dug at the Dan Ellis well pad.
..

Paul Sites said Chesapeake began supplying the three affected homes on Friday with water from the Towanda Municipal Authority. The water is stored in tanks on site that can hold 1,100 or 1,500 gallons.

The residents of the three homes say that Chesapeake offered to put them up in a hotel temporarily, but the residents said they have not taken them up on the offer.
 
When mistakes happen like non-harmful methane leaks out into private water wells, energy companies Chesapeake seem very willing to help remedy the situation anyway they can.

Go turn your shower on and let it get good and hot. Your bathroom is filling with methane and steam. Turn on the exhaust fan.

Spark.
 
Back
Top