trey4sports
Member
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2007
- Messages
- 12,588
I think the question is really..... would having ron in the national debates be worth the prospect of potentially flushing any future we had with the GOP down the drain?
so nothing really big was announced huh. =|
so nothing really big was announced huh. =|
Romney is ruthless. He's already trying to get the Libertarians off the ballots in the key battleground states.
"I think we should communicate (LP) that they should accept Ron Paul in any way on the Libertarian ticket"
He's talking about loser laws and how it maybe harder to get Ron Paul in President spot as opposed to Vice President position. To have Paul/Johnson ticket the VP would have to step out and Johnson would step down and RP would come in as President.
It sounds to me he wants to lobby both Paul/Johnson and Johnson/Paul, either way sounds like he would be happy with. The caller makes a point that Paul at the top of the ticket would carry more weight then the other way around.
His main point is although not impossible would be more challenging because of Libertarian rules that would need to be either changed or certain people would need to decide to step down/out, etc. but not impossible.
I think the question is really..... would having ron in the national debates be worth the prospect of potentially flushing any future we had with the GOP down the drain?
If people truly question whether I have a backbone or not after everything I have done for the Liberty movement then we are farther behind as a movement than I thought we were.
I think the question is really..... would having ron in the national debates be worth the prospect of potentially flushing any future we had with the GOP down the drain?
I'm not sure I support the Ron running as VP. There would be damage to R candidates that support him without recourse.
BUT, If Ron were running as Pres and Gary as VP, then Ron would be in the debates, and that would give R candidates ammo.
IMHO.