I'd like to know - WHO made the decision to publicize the fact that the books had been burned in the first place? 
Why was this necessary? Couldn't they have just removed them and left it at that? Surely they know by now that advertising anything that could be construed as negative toward muslims is likely to set off a reaction from them. It's as though they wanted to provoke this -or- are not giving us the real story!

Why was this necessary? Couldn't they have just removed them and left it at that? Surely they know by now that advertising anything that could be construed as negative toward muslims is likely to set off a reaction from them. It's as though they wanted to provoke this -or- are not giving us the real story!