Matt Collins
Member
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2007
- Messages
- 47,707
They did poll NH... apparently this issue didn't move voters.Would have been nice if the campaign had payed for one.
They did poll NH... apparently this issue didn't move voters.Would have been nice if the campaign had payed for one.
They did poll NH... apparently this issue didn't move voters.
They did poll NH... apparently this issue didn't move voters.
Do you have a sample of this poll that explicitly mentions Northern Pass and Romney's links to it? Please post this poll and the results along with the name of this specific polling company and their methodology.
What polling data do you have to support this?![]()
If the campaign internals had shown it was a winnable issue, they would've started talking about it obviously. Unless of course Ron didn't want to.Do you have a sample of this poll that explicitly mentions Northern Pass and Romney's links to it? Please post this poll and the results along with the name of this specific polling company and their methodology.
If the campaign internals had shown it was a winnable issue, they would've started talking about it obviously. Unless of course Ron didn't want to.
Please cite the scientifically sound polling data which backs up this claim.
Do you have a sample of this poll that explicitly mentions Northern Pass and Romney's links to it? Please post this poll and the results along with the name of this specific polling company and their methodology.
It's unlikely that a campaign would ever publicly release internal polling.
If the campaign internals had shown it was a winnable issue, they would've started talking about it obviously. Unless of course Ron didn't want to.
He is basing it on real world results of where he ran the ad on his own dime. Unlike your pathetic lie about Tom Woods.
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/false-causeHonestly...
The ads ran in three papers across NH.
Two weeks later, IIRC the dates, those papers endorsed Ron.
Then he won Coos county, one of the places that would be most affected by NP.
The campaign wanted no part of it, didn't even want to try and look at it.
The campaign being run by Benton.
Jesus.
You can only run around saying "logical fallacy" so often, until it becomes ridiculous.
Strike a match and hold it to paper, and the paper will burn.
Obvious facts are obvious.
There was no control group.... and there was no proof of correlation... a poll showing this being a winning issue would go a long way to linking the two and making correlation and causation much more likely.Matt question. How many science classes did you take in college? How many logic classes did you take? WRT science, not all science is based on "polling". Sometimes there are things called "controlled experiments". That's what it sounds like AF did. He tested his hypothesis by taking out ads and seeing if there was an effect. Seems like there was. His not having a "poll" to go along with it does in no way negate the validity of this experiment. And copying and pasting from "your logical fallacy.com" doesn't make you a logician. Just saying.
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/false-cause
Not saying there was no connection, but stringing a bunch of facts together does not equal causation.
Anyway, what polling data do you have to show that this was a winning issue?
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/burden-of-proofStill waiting on your polling data w/ regards to N.P. Put up or shut up.
No, because they are not identical to the counties where ads were run... therefore they cannot be a control group because they are different than the variable group.Sorry Matt. You're not a scientist. Quit trying to play one on the internet. The "control group" are the counties that didn't get any ad money.
No, because they are not identical to the counties where ads were run... therefore they cannot be a control group because they are different than the variable group.
I don't disagree, which is why polling the counties in question is the only way to show correlationThen it's not possible to have a control group at all because no two counties in the nation are absolutely identical.
Which means there's no possible way to turn political science into a hard science.