Analysis: Increasingly Diverse U.S. Counties Quickly Turn Democrat

There is no such thing as "race"...we are human beings...the stupid censor program won't let me type the proper latin name.

There is, however, ethnicity, and clearly quantifiable differentiation between ethnic groups.

And ethnic loyalty.

You're making a distinction without a difference.

Call it different flavors of people or different psychic auras of people, it doesn't affect the argument.
 
The majority ethnic group, compromised of western European stock.

There are more people of Western European stock in the United States than ever before.


I own a white Jeep. If I replace my white Jeep with a black Jeep, how many Jeeps will I own and what colors will they be?
 
How so?

You wouldn't say that the nation's deficit had declined if it had increased. If it declined as a percentage of GDP you would say so. To omit your point of reference is to confuse the reader. In this case, it's obviously intentional.

The point of reference was not omitted. In the second paragraph of his article, the author explicitly tells you what he's talking about [bold emphasis added]:
The latest Pew Research Center study, as Breitbart News reported, finds that about 109 U.S. counties across 22 states that were once majority white in 2000 became majority-minority in 2018. Today, there are roughly 293 majority-minority U.S. counties, concentrated mostly along the coasts in states such as California, Florida, Texas, Virginia, North Carolina, Louisiana, Alabama, and Mississippi.

FTA [bold emphasis added]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Majority_minority
A majority-minority area or minority-majority area is a term used in the United States to refer to a jurisdiction in which one or more racial and/or ethnic minorities (relative to the whole country's population) make up a majority of the local population.

The author was obviously making his claims "relative to the whole [county's] population" - and it is simply asinine to pretend not to understand this.
 
The point of reference was not omitted. In the second paragraph of his article, the author explicitly tells you what he's talking about [bold emphasis added]:


FTA [bold emphasis added]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Majority_minority


The author was obviously making his claims "relative to the whole [county's] population" - and it is simply asinine to pretend not to understand this.
That's his MO alright.
 
One whole party (including the whites in it) has announced that they exist to punish whites and natives while serving minorities and foreigners, the replacements tend to vote for them by a wide margin.

Really? Fascinating. That's quite the party platform.


the ratio could be between men and women or between Republicans and Demoncrats or any other groups for the purpose of that statement in context.
Was it?
 
Really? Fascinating. That's quite the party platform.
Yes, it is.



In the context of the conversation there were no specific groups, I discussed the subject of politics in general, the principle I pointed out applies to the OP and to all other political articles involving any and all groups.

You are looking mighty stupid trying to distort my words into racism.
 
They are replacing Americans as the political majority that controls our government.

Isn't our government 100% Americans? Aren't they all citizens of the United States of America? Aren't all voters Americans? Is the French government going to take over? Who is it taking over for the Americans? Russia? China?
 
No, many of them have divided loyalties.


No, many are voting illegally and many are Americans in name only, they come as foreigners and intend to change us instead of joining us.

How many? Link? Are these French voters? Russians? Do they come here just to vote?
 
No, many of them have divided loyalties.


No, many are voting illegally and many are Americans in name only, they come as foreigners and intend to change us instead of joining us.

White power!

(I wonder if Ron Paul would endorse the white nationalism on this board that bears his name? The moderators must be in to this kind of stuff....wow)
 
White power!

(I wonder if Ron Paul would endorse the white nationalism on this board that bears his name? The moderators must be in to this kind of stuff....wow)
That's a weak attempt to defame me and the site.
 
Back in 2009 we had a couple of actual white nationalists try to set up shop on here. It didn’t work. This here doesn’t look anything like that did. I’m not seeing “white nationalism.” I’m seeing cultural protectionism. Whether I think that’s ultimately misguided or not, it’s not white nationalism.
 
One whole party (including the whites in it) has announced that they exist to punish whites and natives while serving minorities and foreigners, the replacements tend to vote for them by a wide margin.





Where does that say anything about race?

We were discussing how the numbers were reported, the ratio could be between men and women or between Republicans and Demoncrats or any other groups for the purpose of that statement in context.

I am white, my wife is Korean. We have interracial children.

You are the kind of person that I warn my children about. Ignorant, nationalistic, statist, close minded morons.

Your mindset is directly opposed to even small government, yet you aren't aware enough to realize it.

I do apologize for the name calling...I hope you can prove my suspicion about you wrong in the future.
 
Back in 2009 we had a couple of actual white nationalists try to set up shop on here. It didn’t work. This here doesn’t look anything like that did. I’m not seeing “white nationalism.” I’m seeing cultural protectionism. Whether I think that’s ultimately misguided or not, it’s not white nationalism.

I'm amazed that liberty minded people entertain any kind of cultural protectionism or nationalism...at all. Those are coercive mindsets.
 
I am white, my wife is Korean. We have interracial children.

You are the kind of person that I warn my children about. Ignorant, nationalistic, statist, close minded morons.

Your mindset is directly opposed to even small government, yet you aren't aware enough to realize it.

I do apologize for the name calling...I hope you can prove my suspicion about you wrong in the future.
You have made it clear that you side with the communists in the Demoncrat party so it is no surprise that you support their attempts to import a permanent communist supermajority.

Your spin is weak and childish.
 
I'm amazed that liberty minded people entertain any kind of cultural protectionism or nationalism...at all. Those are coercive mindsets.
Liberty is a part of culture, if you don't protect it then you will lose it.
You obviously want us to lose it.
 
Back in 2009 we had a couple of actual white nationalists try to set up shop on here. It didn’t work. This here doesn’t look anything like that did. I’m not seeing “white nationalism.” I’m seeing cultural protectionism. Whether I think that’s ultimately misguided or not, it’s not white nationalism.
Liberty is part of culture, I'm proud to proclaim that I am protective of it.
 
You have made it clear that you side with the communists in the Demoncrat party so it is no surprise that you support their attempts to import a permanent communist supermajority.

Your spin is weak and childish.

Is that a serious statement? Or do you have something mental going on that I dont know about?
 
Liberty is part of culture, I'm proud to proclaim that I am protective of it.
Liberty is more appreciated by some cultures and less appreciated by other cultures, but no culture has a monopoly on liberty and neither does liberty itself have a monopoly on any culture.
 
Back
Top