Analysis: Increasingly Diverse U.S. Counties Quickly Turn Democrat

[Brian4Liberty]

Increasingly Diverse U.S. Counties Quickly Turn Democrat

Diversity and race is a side issue. Mainstream propaganda tells immigrants and minorities that Democrats are on their side, and that Republicans hate them. Democrats also make use of the natural human tendency to want an authority that leads, punishes and takes care of people. “Government should do something!” “Government should help and take care of people.” “Government must must control and punish those people.”

Of course, it’s nothing more than a scam from the Democrats. They are lying and taking advantage of the naive and ignorant. Newly arrived immigrants are ripe for taking advantage of, all so that the party elite can gain more power.

The idea that government is not always the solution is almost uniquely American. Thus, people who first come here not only have been conditioned to their prior society, their past society probably catered directly to the standard human desire for authority. Some of them might eventually come around to the idea of less government, but only a portion, and only if there is assimilation.

 

[Anti Federalist]

The idea that government is not always the solution is almost uniquely American. Thus, people who first come here not only have been conditioned to their prior society, their past society probably catered directly to the standard human desire for authority. Some of them might eventually come around to the idea of less government, but only a portion, and only if there is assimilation.

Exactly.

 

[Brian4Liberty]

Wow, even Vox will tell you that it's not just whites, go to any neighborhood that is being over-ran with different people and the home party will not like it, or those other people.

They get part of it right. It is often about a group favoring their own. For example, a Hispanic person might strongly favor more immigration and be a staunch Democrat. At the same time, in the appropriate company, that person might freely admit that they want more Hispanic immigration, and express a dislike of, and desire to stop immigration from Asia and South Asia. Likewise, someone from South Asia may joke that the whole point is to make America “Indian” again. And a white or black person might say “please, no more immigration from anywhere! We are full, no vacancy!”

Where they get it wrong is calling California a success. California is the failure. People of all kinds flee California or at a minimum, they flee the urban/suburban areas.

In California, it’s about real world problems, not some obscure debate about principles. It’s about things that directly impact people and their standard of living. It’s about getting in the car and it taking 30 minutes to go three blocks, only to get on a ten lane freeway that is stop and go. It’s about astronomical housing prices. It’s about over-crowding. It’s about places going out of business simply because the new residents don’t go there. It’s about homeless people camping everywhere and leaving piles of trash, and human waste. It’s about skyrocketing crime.

That is why people in California oppose immigration. Race and diversity are in the past. Now reality is slamming them in the face.

 

[Philhelm]

Exactly.

Which is why, whenever someone snidely resorts to the "brown people" argument, I make sure to mention that white Europeans are some of the worst. They think we're crazy for the 2nd Amendment, and they don't even believe in freedom of speech. Fuck 'em all.

 

[TheCount]

This article is full of carefully constructed lies.

As an example, Prince William County has more white people in it now than ever before. The white population grew by 20% between 2000 and 2010.

Why does the author say that the white population declined by 23%? Because it suits his narrative - and likewise AF's narrative - of replacement.

 

[Occam's Banana]

This article is full of carefully constructed lies.

As an example, Prince William County has more white people in it now than ever before. The white population grew by 20% between 2000 and 2010.

Why does the author say that the white population declined by 23%? Because it suits his narrative - and likewise AF's narrative - of replacement.

"Grew" and "declined" relative to what, respectively? Without telling us this, there is no way to judge the merit of your criticism.

The white population might have grown by 20% relative to the previously existing white population, while still having declined by 23% relative to the overall population.

I don't know if that is what happened or if, as you assert, the author is playing a shell-game with statistics.

But if it is the latter case, what you have said here is not by itself sufficient to demonstrate it.

 

[Occam's Banana]

In general though, I think the more populated a county becomes the more likely it is to turn democrat.

Any (supposed) mass democracy with a population of a third of a billion people is going to be a steaming hot mess, All you're going to end up with is a noxious brew of socialism and fascism (whether of "left" or "right" or "center" variety), with the "democracy" bit becoming increasingly impotent and irrelevant except as a pressure-relieving "safety valve" that allows the masses to indulge the illusion that they have some kind of say in the matter ...

 

[5Points]

Republican = disappointing
Democrat = deranged

I mean, between the two . . . eh. I mean I know which one I prefer.

Both Republicans & Democrats are bad. But Democrats are worse.

Simply as a thumbnail, not for the truth we all know, the former is in favor of less government, the latter in favor of more government.

The right/left paradigm is a faulty one, obviously. Also, on the scale of coercion, it can be argued that Republicans are much worse than Democrats.

 

[Anti Federalist]

The right/left paradigm is a faulty one, obviously. Also, on the scale of coercion, it can be argued that Republicans are much worse than Democrats.

Ok, then, call one group Mugwumps and the other Roundheads...or whatever you want to.

One favors more government, the other less.

 

[Anti Federalist]

"Grew" and "declined" relative to what, respectively? Without telling us this, there is no way to judge the merit of your criticism.

The white population might have grown by 20% relative to the previously existing white population, while still having declined by 23% relative to the overall population.

I don't know if that is what happened or if, as you assert, the author is playing a shell-game with statistics.

But if it is the latter case, what you have said here is not by itself sufficient to demonstrate it.

I'll be curious to see if somebody actually parses the numbers to find out.

ETA - I took it upon myself to look the numbers up: turns out you are absolutely right.

Overall population increased from 280 to 400 thousand, but the percentage of that population that was white decreased.

 

[Anti Federalist]

Why does the author say that the white population declined by 23%? Because it suits his narrative - and likewise AF's narrative - of replacement.

So, like I have noted so many times:

The Great Replacement is a racist conspiracy theory and does not exist, except when it's celebrated and welcomed, then it does.

 

[5Points]

Ok, then, call one group Mugwumps and the other Roundheads...or whatever you want to.

One favors more government, the other less.

Government seems to grow to a lesser extent when Democrats are in positions of power, at least in the last couple decades. So yeah, I agree with you. Democrats grow government less.

 

[Anti Federalist]

Government seems to grow to a lesser extent when Democrats are in positions of power, at least in the last couple decades. So yeah, I agree with you. Democrats grow government less.

Oh for fuck's sake, go pick nits somewhere else, whoever you are.

Jesus fucking christ...Argumentarians.

We had a solid GOP government at all branches in NH and successfully rolled back government in all directions.

Not anymore, thanks to the Bolsheviks democrat wave.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Government seems to grow to a lesser extent when Democrats are in positions of power, at least in the last couple decades. So yeah, I agree with you. Democrats grow government less.

That's idiotic.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Republican = good
Democrat = bad

?

Republican =
Demoncrat = EVIL

 

[Swordsmyth]

"Grew" and "declined" relative to what, respectively? Without telling us this, there is no way to judge the merit of your criticism.

The white population might have grown by 20% relative to the previously existing white population, while still having declined by 23% relative to the overall population.

I don't know if that is what happened or if, as you assert, the author is playing a shell-game with statistics.

But if it is the latter case, what you have said here is not by itself sufficient to demonstrate it.

If the Count is posting he is deceiving.
It is obviously this:

The white population might have grown by 20% relative to the previously existing white population, while still having declined by 23% relative to the overall population.

 

[Swordsmyth]

The right/left paradigm is a faulty one, obviously. Also, on the scale of coercion, it can be argued that Republicans are much worse than Democrats.

LOL

Your ROLCON is weak.

 

[5Points]

That's idiotic.

No, it's not. You are either unaware of the facts, or choose to ignore them.

 

[Danke]

No, it's not. You are either unaware of the facts, or choose to ignore them.

Who writes and passes spending bills, show that graph.

We already know Clinton reporting is fake, because he spent SSI money to make the numbers lower.

 

[5Points]

LOL

Your ROLCON is weak.

I'm not pretending to be a conservative, if that's what you're saying. I'm against conservatism entirely. Its tyrannical and evil.