1stAmendguy
Member
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2011
- Messages
- 1,327
Guys check this out: http://gregorlove.com/2007/10/805/ It appears Allen did the same thing to Ron back in 2007.
OMG that is the same letter!
Guys check this out: http://gregorlove.com/2007/10/805/ It appears Allen did the same thing to Ron back in 2007.
Guys check this out: http://gregorlove.com/2007/10/805/ It appears Allen did the same thing to Ron back in 2007.
From '07. Still relevant. You would have never known, things never change.
Translation: Romney, Perry, and Cain have no real internet presence, nor popularity among the most tech-savvy generation in American history.
I didn't even get a chance to vote for Ron. Bastards!![]()
NorfolkPCSolutions, nice but drop the ageism, please. Ron Paul is a candidate for everyone; young and old.
We should craft a letter back and nail him.
Hope you don't mind but I borrowed this!Translation: Romney, Perry, and Cain have no real internet presence, nor popularity among the most tech-savvy generation in American history.
LETS DO IT.
Might I humbly present my post above for consideration, dissection, addition, and subtraction? I would gladly help out.
The Daily Paul has already responded. Notice the date. http://www.dailypaul.com/3362/open-letter-to-allen-wastler-managing-editor-cnbccom
Lolololololol; the irony here is remarkable.
"When a well-organized and committed "few" can throw the results of a system meant to reflect the sentiments of "the many," I get a little worried."
Uh, like a few corporate-owned, profit driven media conglomerates? Rupert Murdoch (FOX), Jeffrey Immelt (NBC), Jeffrey Bewkes (CNN), Roger Iger (ABC). Or what about Jamie Dimon (JPM), Brian Moynihan (BOA), Lloyd Blankfein (GS) and the revolving doors between their firms and the federal reserve/treasury?
Get a clue Allen!
"Some of you Ron Paul fans take issue with my decision to take the poll down. Fine. When a well-organized and committed "few" can throw the results of a system meant to reflect the sentiments of "the many," I get a little worried. I'd take it down again. "
You mean like when a "few" (the media) designate a candidate as unelectable? When the media "few" ignore Ron Paul's straw poll victories, his incredibly close second place in Iowa, his strong fundraising.
When the media "few" so glaringly and obviously ignore one candidate that Jon Stewart of Comedy Central does an entire segment lampooning the news media for treating Ron Paul as the "13th floor of politics".
Do you have the balls to address THIS ISSUE, which is that the media few knowingly and consistently work to convince the electorate that Ron Paul is nothing but a gadfly, a joke, a "quixotic" figure - indeed the "few" can throw the results of a system meant to reflect the sentiments of "the many".
You can't deny it, you know it is the case, we know it is the case, so let's just cut the bullshit and see if you have the jounralistic integrity to publicly address this issue. You know and I know that it ain't going to happen, because the man who signs your check says it ain't going to happen.
I wonder though, which is more important - some dedicated supporters LEGITIMATELY skewing a poll (We don't cheat, we organize) or a few global media entities making a complete mockery of our democratic process by repeatedly drumming into the public who is or is not electable...hmmm. And you guys treat seriously people with 1/10th of the support and campaigns either broke or in debt with more credibility.
One has to wonder where Ron Paul would be with a news media that was something more than an establishment propaganda lap dog.
Oh, and you should really catch the Jon Stewart piece if you haven't. It would really be pretty funny if it weren't so devastatingly true.
The Daily Paul has already responded. Notice the date. http://www.dailypaul.com/3362/open-letter-to-allen-wastler-managing-editor-cnbccom