Under RNC rules if Ron participated in the nomination for another party, he could not be nominated at RNC.
So at least unless they delayed their deadline until RNC, this was never going to be an option, given Ron should have the delegate strength to get nominated from the floor.
Under RNC rules if Ron participated in the nomination for another party, he could not be nominated at RNC.
So at least unless they delayed their deadline until RNC, this was never going to be an option, given Ron should have the delegate strength to get nominated from the floor.
While it would not surprise me if they decided to cut their losses and close up shop, I expect them to extend the qualifying deadline to just prior to the online convention date. They have spent a bunch to date, but there would be even bigger costs in a national online primary and the rest of the petition drives. I see no harm in riding this out.Just FYI - as of right now, AE has delayed their caucus because no candidate has met the minimum required number of delegates. If we had backed Paul, he would have won by default. They're going to have an executive board conference to review (and probably lower) the qualifications for candidates, with results available on May 17th.
Being a Ron Paul supporter, shouldn't you be expected to be able to read past an inaccurate or partial headline?
Well, I researched Americans Elect a long time ago. They state in their rules that the online voting process was not the final determining factor in deciding who was the nominee. The Americans Elect Board makes that decision. Since the AE Board is made up of a bunch of international bankers and international corporate CEOs and CFR members, do you really believe that they would select Ron Paul in a million years?Being a Ron Paul supporter, shouldn't you be expected to be able to read past an inaccurate or partial headline?
Well, I researched Americans Elect a long time ago. They state in their rules that the online voting process was not the final determining factor in deciding who was the nominee. The Americans Elect Board makes that decision. Since the AE Board is made up of a bunch of international bankers and international corporate CEOs and CFR members, do you really believe that they would select Ron Paul in a million years?
Besides, do you trust online voting to be accurate? How can online voting be verified?
No, that article isn't right. No candidate met their threshold, so they're going to have meetings and announce Plan B. Congratulations on posting inaccurate info.
Well, I researched Americans Elect a long time ago. They state in their rules that the online voting process was not the final determining factor in deciding who was the nominee. The Americans Elect Board makes that decision. Since the AE Board is made up of a bunch of international bankers and international corporate CEOs and CFR members, do you really believe that they would select Ron Paul in a million years?
Besides, do you trust online voting to be accurate? How can online voting be verified?
I do not at all trust the people behind AE or the online process. I also do not trust GOP leadership or their selection process. My role is to advance Ron Paul's chances to become President and will use every tool presented. I have no problem hijacking AE or the GOP in this cause. If Ron Paul were to go into an online primary with a huge lead a delegates I do not think that AE would destroy their online cred with any tricks. Besides what candidate could the open with that would draw more than Ron Paul. My perspective is that in 2012 they are more driven to get established than promote an agenda. I do expect that to change.
Did you read their rules? How do you verify online voting?
Why do you want an international organization to choose our American president?
That's not what was happening. Why do you want the Revolution to end?
You do understand that international bankers oppose Ron Paul, right?
The beauty of this is that we can work to get Ron the chance to get nominated on the third party ticket without any involvement from Ron and his campaign remnants. Once AE says that he needs to agree to accept the nomination, then and only then is your point an issue.
And at that point, it should be Ron's decision, not yours.
Why do you attack those you support Ron Paul winning the GOP nomination. Why do you work in direct opposition of the majority of users as well as the owners of this site promoting a third party that would dis-qualify the hard worked of R.P. delegates around the nation. Why do you think your personal desires to feed you ego are more important than the lives of others?
You tear down what other build up. .
Your efforts to hijack this one only show you for what you are.