America at Red Giant stage

Joined
Aug 31, 2007
Messages
117,723
The War on Cars… Parked and Otherwise

http://ericpetersautos.com/2015/08/04/the-war-on-cars-parked-and-otherwise/

If you are a car person – or just want to be able to park your car in your own damned driveway – be sure you read the fine print before you buy a house in a neighborhood that has an HOA.

Or – worse – peculiar zoning ordinances.

But even if you do read them, it may not matter. Because the rules can change at any time – and when that happens, your choices boil down to obey – and pay.

Or, move.

For instance, this:

A local news affiliate in Cobb County, Georgia (see here) covered the saga of the Oviedo family, well-scrubbed and extremely middle-class. The family was targeted by local code enforcement bureaucrats (remember BTK?) for having “too many” cars parked in their own driveway.

How many is “too many”?

Four, as it turns out.

The county passed an “open space community” zoning ordinance after the Oviedo family bought their house. Faster than you can say ex post facto, it became an offense – punishable – for any homeowner to have more than two cars parked outside.

The idea being to “encourage” people to not own cars at all – by making it a hassle to own them.

It wasn’t that the cars were parked on the lawn.

Nor that they were parked on the street, in front of the house, on the road – which might be a reasonable restriction or at least, not an affront to the concept of private property – because the street is public property.

The “open spaces” code applies to the Oviedos’ own driveway.

The one they paid for.

Probably having done so on the wild and crazy theory that they’d be able to actually use the driveway they paid for.

The cars were not unsightly “clunkers,” either. One might see reason in that. If we were talking, say, about a primered ’86 Monte Carlo perpetually perched on jackstands, rivulets of oil streaming down the driveway and into the street, open headers fired up at 11 at night.

Something like that, perhaps.

But the two over the limit cars – which belong to the Oviedo’s college-age children, home for the summer – are late-model, not primered and as well-scrubbed as the family itself. One car is a late-model VW Golf, the other a late model Toyota Corolla.

It wasn’t a case of an eyesore or nuisance or expired tags, even.

Just “too many” cars.

“Sustainability,” you see. That’s the subtext.

An anonymous tip from a local Clover sicced the code enforcement bureaucrats on the Oviedos. They immediately faced enormous fines for “noncompliance.”

Which amounted to telling the Oviedos that their children could no longer spend summer break at their parents’ house.

Or at least, making it difficult (and very expensive) for them to do so.

The county relented a little after media coverage ginned up a kerrfuffle and told the Oviedos that they could file an affidavit with them attesting that their kids’ cars were only going to be parked their temporarily (during summer break) in which case the county would “give them a break” on enforcing the code.

All they had to do was pay the county $150 to file the affidavit – plus pay for a “current boundary survey,” which the county says would cost about $1,500-$2,000.

Mind, this is merely to avoid being fined for now – and potentially, dragged away in cuffs and (ultimately) have their house sold off by the county (in the event the Oviedos committed the hideous crime of ignoring the ordinance and not paying the fines) … all because they let their kids park their own cars on – ahem, er – “private” property.

Property which the Oviedos paid for – including the perpetual taxes thereon.

All the burdens of ownership – without the perks!

Which is what it’s coming down to in red giant stage America. A red giant is a sun on the verge of going supernova – or collapsing in on itself and becoming either a black hole or a crisped out cinder of its former self. Its main fuel (hydrogen) spent, it burns other, less (and less) fissionable elements until – at last – there is no longer anything left to burn.

America is a red giant.

The liberty that was its fuel for so many generations is virtually spent. There is no longer any aspect of our lives not subject to interferences, orders, micromanagement… and ultimately, punishment. Not because of a harm caused. But only because someone else doesn’t like whatever it is you’re doing and wants you to stop doing it – or wants you to do something else.

Can you think of one?

What does it say about “our freedoms” – which we’re told constantly are being “fought for” even as they are systematically being taken away – when a family is not allowed to let their own kids (or hell, whomever they damned well please) park in their own damned driveway?

A great deal, actually.

Our freedoms are nullities. We exist on sufferance. There is nothing that’s off limits. No tiny corner of peace where we may rest secure in the knowledge that no one may interfere with us – under color of law, at least. It brings to mind the rape scene in Deliverance, when rabid hillbilly number one tells John Voight’s character: “If we want your money, we’ll take your money. Now get up against that tree.”

Think about that – and the Oviedos – the next time you see some flag-waver warbling about “our freedoms.”
 
Find out who the snitch is and take action. Isn't that what the prison rules are? Better learn them sooner than later. Try stepping out of line if you think you are free.
 
The War on Cars… Parked and Otherwise

Think about that – and the Oviedos – the next time you see some flag-waver warbling about “our freedoms.”

Holy crap! What long winded sniveling.

And only sniveling, totally unwilling to do anything about it. Even agreement upon prime constitutional rights as a start to a lawful and peaceful revolution is more than AF can manage.

AF sez "Leave that for the sincere Americans that do shit, I'm just a sniveler".
 
Last edited:
iM01Dvw.jpg
 
images
TROLL-B-GONE!!!

Can we get that in a large size?

StorageTank.jpeg


There is an infestation which seeks to impair defense of our unalienable rights.

dpv7sg.jpg


False social group comprised of covert agents attempting to use the reputation system to justify their demonstrated rejection of unity in defense of unalienable right through altering or abolishing government destructive to them.

The covert manipulators are working to create acceptance of the HOA within the agenda 21 effort. Reverse psychology through repetition creating inurement.

We can see numerous aspects of the "Gambits of Deception" in the agents action.

22mdjm.jpg


This information is amongst the most valuable released by Snowden, but are we advanced enough to use it?
 
Last edited:
In other news 11.5 years is the average age of a car owned by an America. And get this...these older cars are being blamed for the carnage heaped on young drivers.

Almost half of American teen drivers killed on the road in the past few years were driving cars at least 11 years old. Even worse, those care were often lacking crucial modern safety features, like electronic stability control or side airbags.

http://www.psmag.com/nature-and-technology/dont-buy-kid-clunker-97463

How much longer before the government mandates a cash for clunkers? For the children.
 
In other news 11.5 years is the average age of a car owned by an America. And get this...these older cars are being blamed for the carnage heaped on young drivers.



http://www.psmag.com/nature-and-technology/dont-buy-kid-clunker-97463

How much longer before the government mandates a cash for clunkers? For the children.

"Responsible" parents only permit their progeny to drive new vehicles......:rolleyes:

Like hell!

Kids crash cars, better for them to crash and fix one they've bought and paid for themselves.
 
Can we get that in a large size?

StorageTank.jpeg


There is an infestation which seeks to impair defense of our unalienable rights.

dpv7sg.jpg


False social group comprised of covert agents attempting to use the reputation system to justify their demonstrated rejection of unity in defense of unalienable right through altering or abolishing government destructive to them.

The covert manipulators are working to create acceptance of the HOA within the agenda 21 effort. Reverse psychology through repetition creating inurement.

We can see numerous aspects of the "Gambits of Deception" in the agents action.

This information is amongst the most valuable released by Snowden, but are we advanced enough to use it?
LMAO!!! :D Do you realize you're talking about some of the best known and respected members of this forum?
 
Disobedience is both Planned, and Profitable for those with the power to decreee what a person shall be fined for.

When Laws and Ordinances are passed, when people do not know about them, this works to the Govt / HOA advantage. They want their cake and to eat it too. We want nothing "unsightly" such as "too many cars" AND they want to be able to collect money from people for violations. So which do they want? Do they want people to "obey laws / ordinances" or do they want people to violate their statues and collect money?

They cant have it both ways.
 
LMAO!!! :D Do you realize you're talking about some of the best known and respected members of this forum?

If they cannot agree and accept these prime constitutional intents,

Do you agree and accept that the framers of the founding documents intended for us to alter or abolish government destructive to our unalienable rights?

Do you agree and accept that the ultimate purpose of free speech is to enable the unity adequate to effectively alter or abolish?


there is no good reason for respect of them except their own false social group manipulating the forum into acceptance of them and rejection of what unifies protecting unalienable rights. Get fooled if you must, abandon function if it makes your group approve of you, if
you must, if you need that approval, but I will not be led into such dysfunction.

This IS the internet, and I trust no one that cannot use the fundaments of reason and make overt agreement/acceptance of prime constitutional intent for functional unity.
 
If they cannot agree and accept these prime constitutional intents

Liar.

I did agree, and yet you continue on your rants. (which you will note have nothing to do with my "neg rep" at you, that is strictly for "one starring" perfectly good threads of mine and other people)

Hey CPUD,

I notice you and wiz cannot communicate without video, which is not a good sign. It shows you are controlled by attitude, which in turns controls perceptions.

Do you agree and accept that the framers of the founding documents intended for us to alter or abolish government destructive to our unalienable rights?

Do you agree and accept that the ultimate purpose of free speech is to enable the unity adequate to effectively alter or abolish?


Not answering, to those that can conduct critical thinking, means that you are either deeply confused, hopelessly apathetic, or at worst, a covert agent. How shall you have it be?

Just to play along I'll answer, again.

As to Question the First: Yes

As to Question the Second: Yes, with a condition. It is not the ultimate or only purpose of free speech.

I knew you you had it in you or I wouldn't have spent so much time trying back then.

Let us chew on the second, conditional "yes" a bit.

Alter or abolish is definitely not the only purpose, that I've always said.

However, if a government is getting ready to strart destroying unalienable rights, the killing off of the people fits into that. About the time the unity created starts protecting the peoples lives, what served the purpose of creating the unity is fairly well ultimate.

This pretty fits into the "root purpose" which is biologically social. The PURPOSE in that case is to assure information vital to survival is shared and understood.

The ultimate purpose of a firearm is the same, but you can still shoot cans with it.

Chris, I had answered in the affirmative before.

Why I got angry with you is because I perceived an effort by you, to undo exactly what you want to try to build: unity.

The people will not even come close to unity of any sort, for any purpose, unless and until they realize, or are shown, just how desperate the situation is.

And that is exactly what I am trying to accomplish.

A million man standing army of oppression is all around us, and is gearing up to commit any manner of atrocities.

Pointing out the start of these abuses on a daily basis is trying to achieve that unity you speak of.
 
Last edited:
Liar.

I did agree, and yet you continue on your rants. (which you will note have nothing to do with my "neg rep" at you, that is strictly for "one starring" perfectly good threads of mine and other people)

WTF is "one starring"?

I do not give a crap about rep compared to my unalienable rights.

You agreed conditionally with the PURPOSE of free speech and dropped the ball. It looked like another ploy like Watson ran.

You dropped the ball after I nicely asked for some reasonable discussion on your "conditions", which happen to very much satisfy the infiltrators of government to complete their takeover. No half assed sincerity accepted.

Let us chew on the second, conditional "yes" a bit.

Alter or abolish is definitely not the only purpose, that I've always said.

However, if a government is getting ready to strart destroying unalienable rights, the killing off of the people fits into that. About the time the unity created starts protecting the peoples lives, what served the purpose of creating the unity is fairly well ultimate.

Try again.

Do you agree and accept that the ultimate purpose of free speech is to enable the unity adequate to effectively alter or abolish?
 
Last edited:
I do not give a crap about rep compared to my unalienable rights.

You agreed conditionally with the PURPOSE of free speech and dropped the ball. It looked like another ploy like Watson ran.

You dropped the ball after I nicely asked for done reasonable discussion on your "conditions", which happen to very much satisfy the infiltrators of government to complete their takeover. No half assed sincerity accepted.

Try again.

Do you agree and accept that the ultimate purpose of free speech is to enable the unity adequate to effectively alter or abolish?

No, I will not.

I have already answered your questions, I have tried to be polite, I have tried to engage in a meaningful conversation, I explained my position, calmly and politely, numerous times.

Where the fuck do you think you get the right to interrogate me?

Piss off and leave my threads alone.
 
I have already answered your questions, I have tried to be polite, I have tried to engage in a meaningful conversation

Evading reason at the critical point nullifies all the meaningless reason.

Consider, you've not even shown enough accountability to explain why you refuse to accept these fundaments to defending unalienable rights. You've not described what sacrifice it presents in doing so.

Pretending that you have not known that I define that the PURPOSE of free speech is not the only use of it won't work. My last quite of my invitation to discuss that matter explains it very well.

Last year you had it explained to you also. I saw a raft of agents trying to pretend that I define the enablement of unity as the only purpose. You were right in there with them trying to use the group pretense of misinterpretation.

BS.

Meaningful to you appears to be, "snivel harder, whine more, wring your hands everyone, it's freaking hopeless."

Sniveling quitter sheep at best, flaming covert manipulator at worst.
 
Last edited:
Evading reason at the critical point nullifies all the meaningless reason.

Consider, you've not even shown enough accountability to explain why you refuse to accept these fundaments to defending unalienable rights. You've not described what sacrifice it presents in doing so.

Pretending that you have not known that I define that the PURPOSE of free speech is not the only use of it won't work. My last quite of my invitation to discuss that matter explains it very well.

Last year you had it explained to you also. I saw a raft of agents trying to pretend that I define the enablement of unity as the only purpose. You were right in there with them trying to use the group pretense of misinterpretation.

BS.

Your creepy thread stalking is creepy.
 
Back
Top