America at Red Giant stage

Either the OP is incredibly stupid, or not sincere.

Tell me, specifically, what is factually incorrect, in this quote from the OP:

Our freedoms are nullities. We exist on sufferance. There is nothing that’s off limits. No tiny corner of peace where we may rest secure in the knowledge that no one may interfere with us – under color of law, at least.
 
Well, damn. I tried to neg-rep the Borg for name-calling & thread-spamming, but I forgot to change the default "I approve" to "I disapprove" before I submitted the rep.

So I ended up plus-repping him instead ... :o:o:o

Took away one of his red bars.

Hello, I am an activist with a fairly proven therapy with a vague history for mental disorders, criminal behaviors, drug and alcohol recovery etc.
 
Well, damn. I tried to neg-rep the Borg for name-calling & thread-spamming, but I forgot to change the default "I approve" to "I disapprove" before I submitted the rep.

So I ended up plus-repping him instead ... :o:o:o

I've done that!!!! Pisses me off when an idiot gets an accidental plus-rep from me.... makes me kind of an idiot too for being too quick on the trigger ;)
 
Those acting as agents act attempt to use their covert social group with the reputation function.

5a5gfm.png


huebner, what the group is doing is tantamount to treason against the constitution, because I am working on constitutional defense.

Uh, is obnoxious bad enough?

And since not one has agreed unconditionally to these prime constitutional intents;

Do you agree and accept that the framers of the founding documents intended for us to alter or abolish government destructive to our unalienable rights?

Do you agree and accept that the ultimate purpose of free speech is to enable the unity adequate to effectively alter or abolish?


and not one has explained reasonably why they do not ; then the only safe assumption is that they are covert infiltrators of the web forum and are working to cognitively foul Americans ability to unify in defense of the constitution.

Not one has explained what sacrifice making said agreement represents. The overall situation with this coordinated group is wholly inconsistent with the behavior of sincere Americans.
 
Those acting as agents act attempt to use their covert social group with the reputation function.

5a5gfm.png


huebner, what the group is doing is tantamount to treason against the constitution, because I am working on constitutional defense.

Uh, is obnoxious bad enough?

And since not one has agreed unconditionally to these prime constitutional intents;

Do you agree and accept that the framers of the founding documents intended for us to alter or abolish government destructive to our unalienable rights?

Do you agree and accept that the ultimate purpose of free speech is to enable the unity adequate to effectively alter or abolish?


and not one has explained reasonably why they do not ; then the only safe assumption is that they are covert infiltrators of the web forum and are working to cognitively foul Americans ability to unify in defense of the constitution.

Not one has explained what sacrifice making said agreement represents. The overall situation with this coordinated group is wholly inconsistent with the behavior of sincere Americans.

Looks like you have a fan Chris, lol.
 
Do you agree and accept that the framers of the founding documents intended for us to alter or abolish government destructive to our unalienable rights?

Do you agree and accept that the ultimate purpose of free speech is to enable the unity adequate to effectively alter or abolish?

Not one has explained what sacrifice making said agreement represents. The overall situation with this coordinated group is wholly inconsistent with the behavior of sincere Americans.

I've agreed with the first and agreed with the second, with conditions, numerous times.

But you continue, on and on and on.
 
Well, damn. I tried to neg-rep the Borg for name-calling & thread-spamming, but I forgot to change the default "I approve" to "I disapprove" before I submitted the rep.

So I ended up plus-repping him instead ... :o:o:o

I don't do the rep much, but when I do it's to balance the forces of nature. Net gain is zero.
 
I ought to give him a plus rep for, unwittingly, throwing LE under the bus for me.

Hey Chris, you do know that it's generally accepted to be in poor taste to post rep comments, don't you?

Not quite as bad as posting a PM's contents without permission, but in the same vein.
 
Those acting as agents act attempt to use their covert social group with the reputation function.

5a5gfm.png


huebner, what the group is doing is tantamount to treason against the constitution, because I am working on constitutional defense.

Uh, is obnoxious bad enough?

And since not one has agreed unconditionally to these prime constitutional intents;

Do you agree and accept that the framers of the founding documents intended for us to alter or abolish government destructive to our unalienable rights?

Do you agree and accept that the ultimate purpose of free speech is to enable the unity adequate to effectively alter or abolish?


and not one has explained reasonably why they do not ; then the only safe assumption is that they are covert infiltrators of the web forum and are working to cognitively foul Americans ability to unify in defense of the constitution.

Not one has explained what sacrifice making said agreement represents. The overall situation with this coordinated group is wholly inconsistent with the behavior of sincere Americans.

 
Back
Top