TheCount
Member
- Joined
- Mar 15, 2014
- Messages
- 11,748
I'm not going to spend any time researching the intricacies of the TPP claim since you didn't even get the Paris Accord claim correct.
I'll spare you: We were never part of the TPP.
I'm not going to spend any time researching the intricacies of the TPP claim since you didn't even get the Paris Accord claim correct.
Perhaps he always had more conservative beliefs but spoke the party line in order to avoid political persecution in New York?Yes I have but the older I get, the more hardened I get with my beliefs. And when it comes to something connected to my value system, those are definitely the hardest to change. The idea that Trump the politician in his 70s will change his views to be in line with that of Christian, family oriented, Midwest values is not believable. I believe that in his heart of hearts, he hates abortions but supports it. For a womanizer like him without any out of wedlock children, you have to imagine that he has paid for a few procedures himself.
We were well into the process of joining.I'll spare you: We were never part of the TPP.
look up the definition of pilpul, folks. google is not your friend for this one.![]()
We well into the process of joining.
Perhaps he always had more conservative beliefs but spoke the party line in order to avoid political persecution in New York?
He said he supported abortion in the third trimester. This late type abortion is even unpopular with many liberals. If he was pretending, why go that far? I think its way more believable that he was a real liberal (with some conservative values) but decided to pretend to be a conservative when he realized that he could win with them.
It was globalist whether it was pro or anti China.TPP was always on the table to get China to make a deal with us. Trump threw it off the table because he thought he could use throwing it off the table as leverage. Everyone who ever takes over leadership always thinks they can do things differently and won't have to play ball. Like Rand said in the debates TPP was just designed to counter China, it was anti China.
He didn't have to placate average liberals, he had to please radicals in NYC politics and the entertainment industry.He said he supported abortion in the third trimester. This late type abortion is even unpopular with many liberals. If he was pretending, why go that far? I think its way more believable that he was a real liberal (with some conservative values) but decided to pretend to be a conservative when he realized that he could win with them.
It was globalist whether it was pro or anti China.
You mean if Susano talks about Sweden I can't say what my friends there have told me?![]()
Whodda thunk!
You have to understand that his ego is so big, that he is so vain that he would not be dragging his name through the mud unless it was selfless.
I thought his timing was tasteless as well.I think we have found someone whose ego is larger than Trump's. He wanted me to take time out of celebrating America's secession and the spirit of '76 to care about his hissy fit? Screw him.
That's all real nice and I agree with George Washington. It was so good of Justin to use the NWO paper of record, that hates our constitution, to publish his agreement with our first president. That said, did he just fall off the turnip truck? Since when has the Republican Party been about limited government and all of that other good stuff? Not in my lifetime. They're just a tad better than Democraps in that regard. Was it US policy in central and south America, propping up dictators and regimes that tortured dissidents that made Justin think the Republican Party was all about freedom and limited govt? Maybe Desert Storm, initiated by Mr New World Order himself, Bush 41? Perhaps the Iraq war and Bush 43? The massive deficits? The militarism of the neocons? Democraps are the ideological descendants of the Bolsheviks but Republicans sure as hell have never been Jeffersonian so I find his farewell to the GOP to be insincere or, maybe, kind of ideologically delusional because it doesn't reflect reality.
All that aside, there was no Russia "collusion" and no matter how distasteful Justin finds Trump, he's done nothing impeachable. By endorsing the sham Mueller report , Justin aligned himself with those who cooked that fraud up (talk about doing ANYTHING to retain power). I would have respected him more if he'd just said he'd done some soul searching, realized he's a Libertarian, opposes US sovereignty and supports open borders and went on his way. I'm very glad he's done this, though, because Democrats would have assured his win in the primary.
I hate our partisan system and wish that anyone who runs for office would have to do so in under their name only without party affiliation. That's not what we have, though. What we DO have is a country teetering on the edge of going full on Marxist, thanks to immigration policies that allowed a fifth column into this country, and Justin wants more of that. We're in death spiral, alright, and even the all powerful (snark) Trump can barely keep it at bay.
We were well into the process of joining.
Standing on principle is most important to me, especially regarding NAP and Property Rights. The “do as I say, not as I do” approach is not something that I respect, and the people who learn/teach that are what has helped cause the spiral down into loss of liberty.
If I told you that I live in a neighborhood where 99% were extreme socialist democrats would your position change?
Because Trump pulled the plug.Joining what? The TPP doesn't exist.
https://www.constitutionparty.com/contact/state-parties/
Mr Mohr,
I have recently become aware that Mr. Justin Amash is leaving the GOP as a representative of Michigan.
I writing to see if yourself or the Constitution Party has considered welcoming Mr. Amash to The Constitution Party to help further the cause of Liberty. Perhaps in the near future as a possible future candidate for the office of the presidency.
Sincerly,
Let's see if the Constitution Party likes him.