Amash is saying Trump has engaged in an impeachable offense

[devil21]

Lying and trumping up false charges with an illegal investigation in order to overthrow the duly elected President is a coup.

The TDS brigade will avoid noticing that no matter what mental gymnastics are required.

Wait, y'all are still fighting over what 9/11 co-conspirators Mueller, Giuliani, AG Barr and other swamp dwellers say on the teevee? It was mildly entertaining for a moment but it's time to move on to the next episode.


^^^^^^^

...and the titanic struggle for the soul of the republic exists only in the minds of GOP media consumers.

 

[loveshiscountry]

Lying and trumping up false charges with an illegal investigation in order to overthrow the duly elected President is a coup.

The TDS brigade will avoid noticing that no matter what mental gymnastics are required.

Amash isn't lying and trumping up false charges about obstruction. Was the collusion fake? Yes it was. The obstruction isn't which is what Amash is making it about. Could that obstruction be insignificant? Yes it could be but it isn't made up.

 

[loveshiscountry]

So why did Amash vote in favor of "tabling" the impeachment bill, which is effectively a vote killing it?

Was all this sound and fury, signifying nothing?

Seems to me, if this was such an important issue to you, you would have voted to at least continue the process.

Because that would make the agenda false. We can't have that. How in the world can we throw one of the best defenders of the Constitution and rights of the individual under the bus if we don't make things up?

Can you imagine fighting with these cut and run pussies in a battle?

 

[Swordsmyth]

Amash isn't lying and trumping up false charges about obstruction. Was the collusion fake? Yes it was. The obstruction isn't which is what Amash is making it about. Could that obstruction be insignificant? Yes it could be but it isn't made up.

There is NO obstruction, it's totally a lie.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Because that would make the agenda false. We can't have that. How in the world can we throw one of the best defenders of the Constitution and rights of the individual under the bus if we don't make things up?

Can you imagine fighting with these cut and run pussies in a battle?

I can imagine Amash shooting allies in the back.

 

[loveshiscountry]

I can imagine Amash shooting allies in the back.

lol Yea I believe you would believe that.

 

[loveshiscountry]

There is NO obstruction, it's totally a lie.

Well of course there isn't. Trump not the kind of person to fight back. We all know he's the type to sit back and let the cards fall where they may. sarcasm x 1 million

Because we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment, we did not draw ultimate conclusions about the President’s conduct. The evidence we obtained about the President’s actions and intent presents difficult issues that would need to be resolved if we were making a traditional prosecutorial judgment. At the same time, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, we are unable to reach that judgment. Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.

To be clear, obstruction statutes do not require proof of such a crime.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Well of course there isn't. Trump not the kind of person to fight back. We all know he's the type to sit back and let the cards fall where they may. sarcasm x 1 million

Fighting back isn't obstruction.

Nothing Trump did was obstruction.

 

[loveshiscountry]

Fighting back isn't obstruction.

Nothing Trump did was obstruction.

By repeating your statements and not responding to what I've posted it somehow becomes your truth?

Again- Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.
Why don't you explain to everyone here what you know. What the report doesn't tell us? You seem to know but for some reason wont share with others.


Can you imagine fighting with these cut and run pussies in a battle?

The best thing about what Amash is doing is the same ones who are lost are not throwing Rand under the bus and writing him off. Too busy cutting and running from Amash to screw up another conservative. Granted the wind will blow next week and the emotional, irrational, "defenders of Liberty" will shriek about something else.

All day.

 

[Swordsmyth]

By repeating your statements and not responding to what I've posted it somehow becomes your truth?

Again- Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.
Why don't you explain to everyone here what you know. What the report doesn't tell us? You seem to know but for some reason wont share with others.


Can you imagine fighting with these cut and run pussies in a battle?

All day.

Don't insult my intelligence, not only is it not the place of a prosecutor to exonerate but failure to exonerate doesn't prove obstruction and Mueller is a lying scumbag.

How about you commit yourself to identifying an obstructive act so you can have your argument demolished like Amash's argument was?

I don't have to prove Trump innocent, you have to prove him guilty.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Can you imagine fighting with these cut and run pussies in a battle?

The best thing about what Amash is doing is the same ones who are lost are not throwing Rand under the bus and writing him off. Too busy cutting and running from Amash to screw up another conservative. Granted the wind will blow next week and the emotional, irrational, "defenders of Liberty" will shriek about something else.

All day.

I can imagine fighting with you and getting stabbed in the back because you listened to enemy propaganda or because you are an enemy spy.

 

[loveshiscountry]

I can imagine fighting with you and getting stabbed in the back because you listened to enemy propaganda or because you are an enemy spy.

Yes I believe you would believe that. But that's on you and your weak character.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Yes I believe you would believe that. But that's on you and your weak character.

You've got nothing but lies and insults.

 

[loveshiscountry]

Don't insult my intelligence, not only is it not the place of a prosecutor to exonerate but failure to exonerate doesn't prove obstruction and Mueller is a lying scumbag.

Again "while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him." Nothing more, nothing less. What you just posted insults your own intelligence.

How about you commit yourself to identifying an obstructive act so you can have your argument demolished like Amash's argument was?

Because I'm not the one saying there is obstruction.

I don't have to prove Trump innocent, you have to prove him guilty.

Which is what the impeach hearings would be about. You're not very good at this.

 

[loveshiscountry]

You've got nothing but lies and insults.

You've got nothing but lies and insults while being a hypocritical pussy.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Again "while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him." Nothing more, nothing less. What you just posted insults your own intelligence.

He doesn't need exoneration.

Because I'm not the one saying there is obstruction.

Yes you are:

Well of course there isn't. Trump not the kind of person to fight back. We all know he's the type to sit back and let the cards fall where they may. sarcasm x 1 million

Because we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment, we did not draw ultimate conclusions about the President’s conduct. The evidence we obtained about the President’s actions and intent presents difficult issues that would need to be resolved if we were making a traditional prosecutorial judgment. At the same time, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, we are unable to reach that judgment. Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.

To be clear, obstruction statutes do not require proof of such a crime.

Which is what the impeach hearings would be about. You're not very good at this.

Impeachment is not an investigation, you have to have obstruction to pursue impeachment and there isn't any.

You are very bad at this.

 

[Swordsmyth]

You've got nothing but lies and insults while being a hypocritical pussy.

Projection.

 

[loveshiscountry]

Projection.

Whining hypocrite

 

[loveshiscountry]

He doesn't need exoneration.

According to you? lol

Yes you are:

No I'm not. I'm saying that is Amashs reasoning.
Like I said, you're not very good at this.

Impeachment is not an investigation, you have to have obstruction to pursue impeachment and there isn't any.

You are very bad at this.

Yes the impeachment hearings are an investigation. We the people hear information on why one is being impeached. Or maybe you think it is just a voice vote? You suck at this. Trying so hard to be right, instead of looking for the truth.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Whining hypocrite

You are weak and losing badly, keep projecting and it will stay that way.