Amash is saying Trump has engaged in an impeachable offense

[timosman]

Or he was a wolf in sheep's clothing all along.

Paul's were never good at evaluating people.

 

[timosman]

The left is on the offensive. This is really funny. The part about advertisers is spot on. :

 

[nbhadja]

Amash is looking more and more like a wolf in sheep's clothing.

I'd still rather he keep his seat since he maintains such a great voting record as camouflage but I would recommend not turning your back on him or ever giving him higher office, if he ever gets in the Senate I would expect him to transform into a first class RINO like Flake did, he may end up doing so in the House anyway.

Yes, I agree. He votes much better than most members of congress (though he is absolutely pathetic on immigration), but I personally dislike the guy and think he is a sell out coward and a short sighted moron blinded by purity and personal greed. He is clearly opposed to Trump in order to try and save his family business, which is reliant on cheap Chinese manufacturing. He is so blinded by purity and lacking long term strategy that he just pissed off most Republican voters and greatly increased the chances that he fails to get reelected in 2020. I will laugh when he gets voted out and his family business fails as well.

 

[nikcers]

Would you guys be arguing if he said hiring John Bolton is an impeachable offense?

 

[timosman]

Would you guys be arguing if he said hiring John Bolton is an impeachable offense?

Do you have a better question?

 

[Swordsmyth]

Would you guys be arguing if he said hiring John Bolton is an impeachable offense?

Yes, hiring Bolton as an advisor may not be a good idea but it is not an impeachable offense.

 

[nikcers]

Yes, hiring Bolton as an advisor may not be a good idea but it is not an impeachable offense.

They have impeached for a lot less offensive things in my opinion.

 

[Ender]

Yes, I agree. He votes much better than most members of congress (though he is absolutely pathetic on immigration), but I personally dislike the guy and think he is a sell out coward and a short sighted moron blinded by purity and personal greed. He is clearly opposed to Trump in order to try and save his family business, which is reliant on cheap Chinese manufacturing. He is so blinded by purity and lacking long term strategy that he just pissed off most Republican voters and greatly increased the chances that he fails to get reelected in 2020. I will laugh when he gets voted out and his family business fails as well.

Donald Trump has more than 100 trademarks in China, including 35 granted pre-approval since he became US president.

https://qz.com/929553/here-are-all-...sident-owns-in-china-and-some-that-he-doesnt/

 

[Swordsmyth]

Donald Trump has more than 100 trademarks in China, including 35 granted pre-approval since he became US president.

https://qz.com/929553/here-are-all-...sident-owns-in-china-and-some-that-he-doesnt/

And yet he disregards his personal interests in favor of the good of his country.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Here is the real reason that shill Amash has had stage 5 TDS for years now:



Amash is just another politician in it for himself and owned by China. At least be honest and admit you oppose Trump because the tariffs will hurt your family business instead of appeasing the libtard morons by promoting the debunked collusion and obstruction hoax.

https://theconservativetreehouse.co...holding-personal-business-interests-in-china/

China.

China is the powerbase of Communism today.


This will all lead back to China.

The cold war never ended, it just went into stealth mode.

 

[kcchiefs6465]

Yes, I agree. He votes much better than most members of congress (though he is absolutely pathetic on immigration), but I personally dislike the guy and think he is a sell out coward and a short sighted moron blinded by purity and personal greed. He is clearly opposed to Trump in order to try and save his family business, which is reliant on cheap Chinese manufacturing. He is so blinded by purity and lacking long term strategy that he just pissed off most Republican voters and greatly increased the chances that he fails to get reelected in 2020. I will laugh when he gets voted out and his family business fails as well.

Noted.

He is too pure presumably on immigration and free trade and is versed on economic logic enough to have lost your vote.

I would recommend looking into his background and then following up with, Economics in One Lesson by Henry Hazlitt or Economic Sophisms by Frederic Bastiat.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Noted.

He is too pure presumably on immigration and free trade and is versed on economic logic enough to have lost your vote.

I would recommend looking into his background and then following up with, Economics in One Lesson by Henry Hazlitt or Economic Sophisms by Frederic Bastiat.

ChiCom manipulated trade is not free trade or good for our country and open borders will ensure the extinction of liberty.

 

[timosman]

This is getting silly.

 

[Swordsmyth]

This is getting silly.

It started silly.

 

[axiomata]

this place is turning into a third world shithole

 

[familydog]

Amash wants impeachment 'cause principles. Rand Paul does not want impeachment 'cause principles. Only one is correct. Choose.

 

[swissaustrian]

Besides the anti-Zionist angle and Amash being Palestinian, his family's business being affected by the China tarrifs etc...

I think he is doing it to get press and name recognition ahead of his announcement of a third party run for the LP in 2020.

Not a smart move to use the Mueller saga as a vehicle for that imho, but I think that is the most likely motivation.

By the way:
From a legal point of view, obstruction does NOT require an underlying crime, because obstruction is aimed at preventing the collection of evidence and therefore getting an indicment (H. Clintons deletion of 33000 emails qualifies for sure). The threshold of proof in criminal cases is very high ("beyond reasonable doubt") which is why prosecutors love process crimes like lying to them or obstruction. They are much easier to prove. It is BS and contrary to any common sense, but that is the legal theory behind it.
The Mueller report, however, is NOT claiming that they proved obstruction (beyond reasonable doubt). Instead, they are saying that they could not "exonerate" Trump. Exoneration is NOT a concept of criminal law. It would require proving a negative which is impossible. It also puts the principle of "inncocent until proven guilty" on its head. According to this principle, you are automatically deemed innocent once the prosecution closes the case without an indicment. The exoneration terminolgy used by the Mueller team is a bone thrown to Congress, so that they have a political football to toss arround.

 

[Cap]

I DONT NEED TO.
THERE WAS NO RUSSIAN COLLUSION.
PERIOD. END OF.

Anything Trump did to try to block this stream of treasonous BS about Russian collusion, is cool in my book.
Hell if he would have had Meuller killed with the heart attack gun, I would have been cool with it, because, THE WHOLE THING WAS MADE UP, TREASONOUS NONSENSE, FOR WHICH TENS OF THOUSANDS NEED TO BE EXECUTED.

You mad bro?

 

[EBounding]

Amash wants impeachment 'cause principles. Rand Paul does not want impeachment 'cause principles. Only one is correct. Choose.

Has Rand read through the report?

 

[Schifference]

Has Rand read through the report?

As a gambler, without knowing the answer, but by judging by Rand's character, I would bet that he most certainly has read the report. He is a person that relishes facts. Rand is not wrong on facts or history therefore he most definitely has read the report.