Alex Jones Retraction and Our Reaction

Status
Not open for further replies.
Dr. Paul shouldn't definitely accept all the supporters he can. However, when somebody says "Ron Paul warns of staged terror attack", and he never said it, that is a little irritating.
 
Wow, I never realized there were so many conspiracy theorists on this board. I do believe that there are a select few in power who want to grow their power, but I can't believe most of the conspiracy films that I saw on the internet. They are filled with biased propaganda.

So what most people are saying is that I am one of the select few who isn't a conspiracy theorist that supports Ron Paul? I can't believe that.
 
I'm still scratching my head as to what is wrong with wanting to know what the Truth is about the events of 9/11?

The official story has more holes in than a ton of swiss cheese, so we are entitled to know what really happened on 9/11.

Ron Pauls message is that of Life, Love, Liberty and Freedom and the only way to achieve those objectives is to find out the truth about why our Life, Love, Liberty's and Freedom's are trying to be stolen from us all since 9/11.
 
Ron has said that on the house floor

whats the big damn deal? dont you guys know anything about the gulf of tonkin

see ron say what you blame alex jones of baiting him to say on the floor of the house here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6d8MIENVtKw


whats next? are you all gonna send paul nasty emails?
 
i am all FOR Ron Paul....

If he says please don't do this.....I will comply......

If people want to talk about him being on Alex and wanting him to retract things....

ASK THE MAN RON PAUL....I TRUST HIM COMPLETELY!

Whatever Ron Paul thinks is best for HIS campaign.....I WOULD BE A FOOL TO DISAGREE WITH! SO IF YOU DISAGREE WITH RON PAUL.....Maybe you should contact him.....I am for Ron Paul and will suppot ANYTHING he says as LONG as it is NOT unconstitutional or unlawful!

And I have NEVER seen him support something that is UNCONSTITUTIONAL or UNLAWFUL!
 
Last edited:
Again, you non-truthers (yes, you are the minority I do believe) should check out that Tarpley link I put earlier.

"The 9/11 Issue: Key to stopping World War III" Just Google "Webster Tarpley" its near the top.

I want to get RP elected. I also want to do my best to prevent more staged terror. The false flag nuke attack will come if we don't expose the MO itself.
 
Wow, I never realized there were so many conspiracy theorists on this board. I do believe that there are a select few in power who want to grow their power, but I can't believe most of the conspiracy films that I saw on the internet. They are filled with biased propaganda.

So what most people are saying is that I am one of the select few who isn't a conspiracy theorist that supports Ron Paul? I can't believe that.

study history
 
whats the big damn deal? dont you guys know anything about the gulf of tonkin

see ron say what you blame alex jones of baiting him to say on the floor of the house here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6d8MIENVtKw


whats next? are you all gonna send paul nasty emails?

To me, his example of a Gulf of Tonkin type incident refers to an Iranian military attack on Israel or on our troops in Iraq.

When I hear "staged terror attack" (not Ron Paul's words) I think of an incident like 9/11.
 
When are you guys going to learn?

When something "bad" happens to RP it always ends up being his brightest moments.

And this idea of "false flag operations" in war is not a radical idea. People who are actually watching the places where he would be talked bad about know about GoT, murders at the beginning of WWII, USS Liberty, and Operation Northwoods came out a while back and everyone in the mainstream was just like.......... and whats new??......!!!!!!!!!


RP was not referring to a domestic self inflicted attack; He as talking about a Iranian/US manufactured conflict. The latter is pretty much accepted by all mainstream people who study history as a common way to start an international conflict that one side wanted anyways.
 
Last edited:
So what most people are saying is that I am one of the select few who isn't a conspiracy theorist that supports Ron Paul? I can't believe that.

Why can't you believe that? I can't help but feel that your rejection of the reality of 9/11 truth being HUGE and being a HUGE base for RP is basically the same as you rejecting the truth about 9/11 itself...a denial of reality.
 
Last edited:
He didn't say "Staged Attack", he said Contrived Gulf of Tonkin style attack. Ultimately he is afraid that some minor incident, that we make inevitable through our rhetoric or Israel's action, will be used as justification for war.

This is different then concept of a "staged attack". The connotations are completely different.

"Creating a situation where war is inevitable" sounds like a credible statement.

"We are going to use a Staged Attack" sounds like paranoia.

Alex Jones should not have used the wording he did, knowing the reaction it would illicit in the mainstream press.
 
To me, his example of a Gulf of Tonkin type incident refers to an Iranian military attack on Israel or on our troops in Iraq.

When I hear "staged terror attack" (not Ron Paul's words) I think of an incident like 9/11.

then you should look into the gulf of tonkin incident because I guess you have no idea what it was. It wasnt staged, but there was no "attack" but that didnt stop them from saying so and putting more boots on the ground in vietnam
 
When are you guys going to learn?

When something "bad" happens to RP it always ends up being his brightest moments.

And this idea of "false flag operations" in war is not a radical idea. People who are actually watching the places where he would be talked bad about know about GoT, murders at the beginning of WWII, USS Liberty, and Operation Northwoods came out a while back and everyone in the mainstream was just like.......... and whats new??......!!!!!!!!!


RP was not referring to a domestic self inflicted attack; He as talking about a Iranian/US manufactured conflict.


Ron Paul is the KING of BLOWBACK!!!!!
 
He didn't say "Staged Attack", he said Contrived Gulf of Tonkin style attack. Ultimately he is afraid that some minor incident, that we make inevitable through our rhetoric or Israel's action, will be used as justification for war.

This is different then concept of a "staged attack". The connotations are completely different.

"Creating a situation where war is inevitable" sounds like a credible statement.

"We are going to use a Staged Attack" sounds like paranoia.

Alex Jones should not have used the wording he did, knowing the reaction it would illicit in the mainstream press.

contrived ,staged whats the difference ?

same thing different word
 
then you should look into the gulf of tonkin incident because I guess you have no idea what it was. It wasnt staged, but there was no "attack" but that didnt stop them from saying so and putting more boots on the ground in vietnam

How was the Gulf of Tonkin incident a "terror attack"?
 
Ron Paul is the KING of BLOWBACK!!!!!

You're right, you're right. I gotta have faith in the guy. Ever since i watched that appearance he made on the Morton Downey Jr. show back in the 88 election I don't think any amount of criticism will break him.

You'll have to excuse me if I got a little worked up. I just finished debunking
http://www.nashuatelegraph.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070714/OPINION01/207140316/-1/HEALTH
by emailing the editors and letting them know about Ron's Interview on Cavuto.

Between people being lazy, people being judgemental, and people being plain liars- there is alot of misinformation out there. I will be calling Iowans tommorow to try and clear some of that up.
 
How was the Gulf of Tonkin incident a "terror attack"?

from the article that has sand in so many vaginas on here

"Presidential candidate Ron Paul says the U.S. is in "great danger" of a staged terror attack or a Gulf of Tonkin style provocation while also warning that a major collapse of the American economy is on the horizon and could be precipitated by the bombing of Iran and the closure of the Persian Gulf. "

do you see anything in there that might make mention of the gulf of tonkin ?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top