Alex Jones Retraction and Our Reaction

[torchbearer]

amen.

 

[LibertyEagle]

Blah, blah, blah Liberty. Ever stop to think it was your drama queen act as to why the second article was written giving Ron Paul more exposure to the subject? It sure wasn't because of me...I never wrote to complain or condemn the article nor went all Ru Paul by posting a thread calling for immediate attention to the original article. Are you paid disinfo or a useful idiot? Hard to tell with you sometimes.

Oh, so now you're saying that I control Alex Jones' actions. How nice. And yes, I know you didn't write to complain, because you probably agree with what he did.

You have it all wrong..... I'm an alien... or is it a lizard. I forget.

 

[PatriotOne]

I see no reason to keep the 9/11 Truth movement a dirty little secret but I do agree that a compromise on the boards would be nice. Name calling is what is damaging as far as I can tell. Pehaps that is what we all should be calling people out on instead of any calm, intellectual conversations on the subject. That is what causes polarization on the subject. But then, the paid disinfo peeps know that so it's why they use it. Anyways, I dont fear the subject, but I pick and choose my audience when mixing the messages.

I'll be real surprised if Mainstream Media picks up any of the Alex Jones stories anyways. The powers sure don't want someone as bullet proof as Ron Paul mixed with the message as it might make others curious about it. If they do, I think it would be Ron Paul who ends up benefiting from it myself. He would then be asked to clarify his position in the media and then could talk about other "staged or False Flag operations" like Gulf of Tonkin, Operation Gladio, Reichstag Flag or the planned on like Operations Northwoods, etc., etc., etc. See where I am going with this? They can't just dismiss him like a Charlie Sheen. Errrr.....major blowback!

Anyways.....I'm all for letting the hysteria on the subject die down at any rate.

Absolutely.

Don't think I haven't thought about it a lot. As far as I can see, there are people on both sides of this controversy who are keeping it at a boil and exacerbating the problem. Perhaps I have been among them.

I still think my points about the need for discretion, tact and diplomacy when dealing with the general public are quite valid. I still think that those of us who want to get to the bottom of 9/11 should keep that issue on a back burner when promoting Ron Paul.

But you're right: I should probably avoid getting so wrapped up in the controversy over that. Of course, perhaps the reason I've taken it so personally is that I have come to resent being called an "idiot", a "thug", an "enemy of Free Speech", and a "reality denier" just because I think we should be discreet when trying to win over the 'Republican base'.

I think all of us could stand to compromise a little bit on this issue so that we can pull together for the win.

 

[PatriotOne]

Oh, so now you're saying that I control Alex Jones' actions. How nice. And yes, I know you didn't write to complain, because you probably agree with what he did.

You have it all wrong..... I'm an alien... or is it a lizard. I forget.

Actually I kind of envision you more like Ru Paul and you need to be bitch slapped .

 

[LibertyEagle]

But then, the paid disinfo peeps know that so it's why they use it. Anyways, I dont fear the subject, but I pick and choose my audience when mixing the messages.

It's this kind of crap that needs to stop. When anyone dares mention that "9-11 truth" should not be attached to Ron Paul, the claims start that the person is a shill, a government informant, an alien, etc.

 

[LibertyEagle]

Actually I kind of envision you more like Ru Paul and you need to be bitch slapped .

Nice mouth, "patriot".

 

[DjLoTi]

Are you guys still going on about this?

The past is the past, the history is history. The only way this is going to keep coming up is if you keep

BUMPing it

let the past pass away and lets focus on the future, the new, the next big thing.

jeez

 

[LibertyEagle]

I see no reason to keep the 9/11 Truth movement a dirty little secret but I do agree that a compromise on the boards would be nice. Name calling is what is damaging as far as I can tell. Pehaps that is what we all should be calling people out on instead of any calm, intellectual conversations on the subject. That is what causes polarization on the subject. But then, the paid disinfo peeps know that so it's why they use it. Anyways, I dont fear the subject, but I pick and choose my audience when mixing the messages.

I'll be real surprised if Mainstream Media picks up any of the Alex Jones stories anyways. The powers sure don't want someone as bullet proof as Ron Paul mixed with the message as it might make others curious about it. If they do, I think it would be Ron Paul who ends up benefiting from it myself. He would then be asked to clarify his position in the media and then could talk about other "staged or False Flag operations" like Gulf of Tonkin, Operation Gladio, Reichstag Flag or the planned on like Operations Northwoods, etc., etc., etc. See where I am going with this? They can't just dismiss him like a Charlie Sheen. Errrr.....major blowback!

Perhaps in the next election, you ought to try to get your hero Alex Jones to run for President. However, this time, Alex is NOT running. This is Ron Paul's campaign.

Some of us would appreciate if a few people would stop trying to attach their own personal agendas to Ron Paul's campaign.

I'll be real surprised if Mainstream Media picks up any of the Alex Jones stories anyways.

Well, prepare to be surprsed! The title of the story was running as a ticker along the bottom of FOX news broadcasts last night. It is also on the FRONT PAGE of Politico!

 

[Wyurm]

It's this kind of crap that needs to stop. When anyone dares mention that "9-11 truth" should not be attached to Ron Paul, the claims start that the person is a shill, a government informant, an alien, etc.

Would you guys mind dropping it. The problem is no longer who is right or who is wrong. Now, the problem is this constant bickering and jumping to offend other supporters. I suggest this whole argument be dropped on both sides. Just drop it, dont make excuses as to why you can't drop it or how its going to do this or that if you drop it, blah blah blah. Just drop it.

Consider it dropped now

 

[PatriotOne]

It's this kind of crap that needs to stop. When anyone dares mention that "9-11 truth" should not be attached to Ron Paul, the claims start that the person is a shill, a government informant, an alien, etc.

As soon as you stop acting like one I'm sure it will stop. Oh and don't forget useful idiot

 

[LibertyEagle]

Are you like 13, "one"?

 

[Mesogen]

I learned about Ron Paul from antiwar.com and their web radio mp3's. Later on I found Alex Jones's websites. AJ is completely over the top, but I guess that may be what he feels is necessary.

I think RP is actively seeking AJ's audience, mainly on the basis of being anti-police state, but he won't turn them off by openly disagreeing with them on certain issues.

I also think that RP's views are much closer to those held by antiwar.com when it comes to foreign policy and terrorism.

 

[JoshLowry]

How many flyers can a person pass out when they are arguing on the internet?

 

[qednick]

I'm getting tired of this Shit. These arguments are Retarded.

I'm with ya!