Alex Jones on air right now, entire show is about Glenn Beck.

I hope this will do..Mini-Mi

"Our race is the Master Race. We Jews are divine gods on this planet. We are as different from the inferior races as they are from insects. In fact, compared to our race, other races are beasts and animals, cattlce at best. Other races are considered as human excrement. Our destiny is to rule over the inferior races. Our earthly kingdom will be ruled by our leader with a rod of iron. The masses will lick our feet and serve us as our slaves." -


Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin in a speech to the Knesset quoted in Begin and the Beasts," New Statesman, June 25, 1982 by Amnon Kapeliouk.

Quoted from an article written by one of Kapeliouk's acquaintances and fellow journo, Jew.


Now tell me what are you going to do about it?

What I'm going to do is, I'm going to make a half-assed effort at verifying it. A quick Google search indicates a few things: Some people claim that quote appeared in that article, and others claim that another "misrepresented" quote* appeared in that article, but NOT that one, and that someone made up the longer quote and illegitimately claimed the Kapeliouk article as a source. Is there a scan from the original article anywhere? Even the full text from the original article would lend some credence, but the problem is, this quote is so widely disputed that we're going to need nothing short of an article scan to provide any margin of certainty...and that's assuming the article itself is reliable. I have a feeling the "Master Race" quote is not actually in the article though, since this isn't the only supposed source for it (my initial Google searches were claiming Jimmy Carter put it in his memoirs, which seems to be untrue).

Sleepy time for now.

*This refers to the "beasts on two legs" quote, which was apparently true but taken out of context.

EDIT: By the way, I'm not a soy guy, but why are you questioning my testosterone levels in particular? ...unless I'm not talking in a deep enough voice or sounding angry enough or something... ;) It just sounded like a strange comment to make.
 
Last edited:
Guys like Beck and Alex Jones are nut jobs for a reason. They are inserted into the media to co-opt opposition vectors and then discredit them, along with all the people who support those vectors.


It's how the game is played. Rationalizing their antics will not provide answers. Instead, try to understand why they perpetrate these antics and why this is a systemic issue and not a personal one.

The big sell, in my mind, is that many people who follow these celebrities actually parrot their talking points, including the speech style, phrasings, and colloquialisms. While 'civilian repeaters/amplifiers' genuinely believe that they are part of an oppositional movement, and are having original awe-inspiring revelations that thwart their collective enemy's progress, these amplifiers actually increase the security and reach of their enemy. Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?
 
There are a few things that I can honestly say about all of this.

1.) I AM about as Right Wing and Conservative as a person can get.
2.) Without Alex Jones, I would have not heard about Ron Paul.
3.) William Milton Cooper was a Patriot and Alex Jones sensationalizes A LOT.
4.) I do not believe the official story on 911 because I'm not fucking stupid.
5.) Glenn Beck is a sensationalist piece of trash, douche bag tool.

See number 1 Glenn and guess which finger on both hands I'm pointing your way right now. I'll give you three guesses and the first two don't count.

THis made me :)

I don't know Cooper right off hand but "Alex Jones sensationalizes A LOT" is true. I think he lives his fear too much and so his show is constant panic. That said, he is a good resource for tracking down potential gov't agendas. Shame he is so polarizing.

Beck is your typical junkie and fame is his drug of choice (quite probably not his only one). I will resent his villification of RP supporters as long as I live and never trust a word out of his mouth without numerous sound sources for back up.
 
No, Glenn Beck is not our ally. Not in the media or anywhere else.

Glenn Beck is quite simple to analyze once you understand Leninist doctrine and where he fits in it. One of the first things Lenin said you should do is organize your own opposition. Then, you can easily misguide and distract those who oppose you and you can squander their time, energy and resources on meaningless battles. This makes it easy for you to do what you really came to do: build collectivism.

Glenn Beck is the figurehead for a Leninist controlled opposition movement. He is not one of us; he never was and never will be.

Rather think of it like this: the inmates of Concentration Camp USA have become more restless over the last couple of years. The establishment realizes that if the braindead are not kept tuned in to the mindless propaganda on television, they will start looking for answers on their own. The natural place for people to look for information is on the internet, where there are no controls on information. This scares the establishment more than anything under the sun.

In order to keep this from happening, Glenn Beck comes on the scene to discuss and discredit the topics people are most worried about. He trots around the issues people are worried about and then inevitably circles back around to validating the government's position. You can think of Glenn Beck like a dog who goes out into the back yard, remembering that somewhere back there he buried a bone last month. Unable to find the bone, the dog sniffs the ground all around the place where he did bury it, and then, in defeat, walks back to the house with no reward.

In the case of Glenn Beck, his sole purpose is to keep people from understanding what is going on. The people tuning in to him are increasingly more restless, and they are gathering in numbers next to the electric fence at the aforementioned Concentration Camp USA. As they congregate, they are rumbling louder and louder about how nice the frontier of Liberty beyond the fence looks.

This is where Glenn Beck comes on stage. He rides up to the congregating inmates to tell them that he has just come from outside the gates and he personally has investigated what they are looking at out there. Then he tells them there is nothing to experience and that things are much better inside the prison camp. The solution to their sorrows, he assures them, is to sign his new petition asking the warden of the concentration camp for better heat in the winter and better AC in the summer. Then he cracks a few jokes about the bureaucratic inefficiency of the prison camp administration and makes a sneer about one of the foul-smelling camp guards. Assured that Beck really is on their side and that things really will get better now, the inmates go back to their barracks and turn in for the evening.

Because Glenn Beck is credible to so many people, he is able to get away with this. I am among those who are not fooled by Glenn Beck the Leninist. Make no mistake, he is a Leninist and he has full knowledge of what is going on, and he is instrumental in making sure Americans continue pouring their energy into worthless endeavors like his 9/12 groups.

Where have you been? This ^^^ is excellent. :eek:
 
I heard the show and have to agree with Alex that Beck, and let us not forget he mentioned Matthews, are pure trash and scum.
 
Ah, the zionism / anti semite / conspiracy theory catch 22. Your mildest criticism of the war on terror (Ron Paul saying our foreign policy incites terrorism) get's the the anti semitism charge. But if you talk about foreign policy, expose the "dancing Israelis", talk about how Israel irradiated Jewish children, talk about Odigo, have a whole section on your website devoted to Mossad involvement in 9/11 and 7/7, talk about the U.S.S. Liberty and the Levine Affair and put all of this in your documentary (Terrorstorm) that still isn't enough for some people who want to say it's all Israel and they'll say you're a zionist. There's just no pleasing some folks. Oh well.
 
Alex citing Beck as a fraud strikes me as awfully hypocritical. He constantly belabors the point, how he's tired of carrying the weight of the world on his shoulders, yet when other media personalities like the late William Cooper and now Beck actually echo his raison d'etre, he lashes out at them. I don't know about you, but if I was pitted against a sinister, monolithic organization like the New World Order, I would welcome any positive reinforcement, regardless of the source. Ideas via mass circulation far exceed petty rivalries and egos at this stage of the game.

So what is it, Alex? Do you want to open up more eyes or you're simply outraged that others are challenging you as the high priest of conspiracy theory? His behavior is very tellling. While we can't be absolutely sure about any of three I mentioned, Alex comes off like an petulant infant when the other two names are brought up. Just some food for thought for everyone to digest.
 
Last edited:
There are a few things that I can honestly say about all of this.

1.) I AM about as Right Wing and Conservative as a person can get.
2.) Without Alex Jones, I would have not heard about Ron Paul.
3.) William Milton Cooper was a Patriot and Alex Jones sensationalizes A LOT.
4.) I do not believe the official story on 911 because I'm not fucking stupid.
5.) Glenn Beck is a sensationalist piece of trash, douche bag tool.

This

Ah, the zionism / anti semite / conspiracy theory catch 22. Your mildest criticism of the war on terror (Ron Paul saying our foreign policy incites terrorism) get's the the anti semitism charge. But if you talk about foreign policy, expose the "dancing Israelis", talk about how Israel irradiated Jewish children, talk about Odigo, have a whole section on your website devoted to Mossad involvement in 9/11 and 7/7, talk about the U.S.S. Liberty and the Levine Affair and put all of this in your documentary (Terrorstorm) that still isn't enough for some people who want to say it's all Israel and they'll say you're a zionist. There's just no pleasing some folks. Oh well.

and That.
 
Alex citing Beck as a fraud strikes me as awfully hypocritical. He constantly belabors the point, how he's tired of carrying the weight of the world on his shoulders, yet when other media personalities like the late William Cooper and now Beck actually echo his raison d'etre, he lashes out at them.

So what is it, Alex? Do you want to open up more eyes or you're simply outraged that others are challenging you as the high priest of conspiracy theory? His behavior is very tellling. While we can't be absolutely sure about any of three I mentioned, Alex comes off like an petulant infant when the other two names are brought up. Just some food for thought for everyone to digest.

I disagree with Alex lashing out William Cooper, but that seems to be personal. Glenn Beck is a tool. I don't recall William Cooper attacking Barry Goldwater like Beck attacked Ron Paul. I don't recall William Cooper saying that conspiracy theorists were dangerous and might try to kill the president that Glenn Beck did. Really I don't know why people want to excuse this. Oh well.
 
listening to AJ for years off and on.. one thing I've noticed is that he's hypersensitive about personal attacks on him... others take that all kinds of ways, but it is what it is.
 
Personal attacks!! :confused:

Like someone saying he's cointel ?
Is it possible to make that accusation without talking about Alex Jones the person ?
 
The big sell, in my mind, is that many people who follow these celebrities actually parrot their talking points, including the speech style, phrasings, and colloquialisms. While 'civilian repeaters/amplifiers' genuinely believe that they are part of an oppositional movement, and are having original awe-inspiring revelations that thwart their collective enemy's progress, these amplifiers actually increase the security and reach of their enemy. Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?
This is why Idolatry is a Sin according to the 10 Commandments (in fact, it is the FIRST Commandment). Humanity has known for thousands of years where idolizing other men will lead us collectively. It destroys ones individuality, and leads us toward cult-like follower-ship.
 
Last edited:
So you lied? What's the point of that and why would you lie ("joke") about something like that? You're weird.

I didnot lie or tell the truth either.

He posted an advertisement for AJ and I posted one for Beck. Comparison shows how both were hypes without any actual content.
 
I posted this a while back, and if I am wrong about any content, feel free to correct me, this is just my humble take on Alex "Sensationalist" Jones...

AJ is great is some ways, horrible in others.

Starting off his joker-Obama show claiming Obama is stealing 27 trillion dollars (seriously) is not a way to build credibility.

Bashing Bill Cooper (God bless his soul) at every moment this man's name is raised, nor giving any props to him whatsoever (ever, I do mean ever), or JBS, or David Rivera, or any other pre-Alex Jones "Alex Jones" is not a way to build credibility either.

Talking about himself for 30 minutes at a stretch is not a way to build credibility.

Bashing the MSM, then citing the MSM, then bashing the controlled NWO MSM, then citing the controlled NWO MSM probably isn't the best way to build credibility either.

Not listening to an engineer (me) try to explain what contract documents are and what they are not (re: WTC 1 & 2) repeatedly over the course of several years is not a way to build credibility either.

Not siding with a caller challenging Ted Nugent (during a caller - Nugent - Jones conversation) on the matter of another 9-11 investigation (Alex claims authority on most things 9-11 trutherhood), rather quickly moving away from the truther caller to a new caller is not a way to build credibility (especially if your MO is 9-11 truth).

Claiming to be all things Ron Paul and promoting Webster Tarpley's promotion of Henry Clay/Lincoln's "American System" on infowars (the furthest thing from Mises/Paul) is not a way to build credibility.

Repeatedly claiming to have refused millions by the establishment to be the "next Rush Limbaugh", yet providing no detail on such an amazing and rare event is not a way to build credibility.

Claiming that everyone is out to "get him and looking at him all crazy and mean like" or that really weird things happen to him on every family vacation, or even a trips to the grocery store wears thin, after a while.

Saying the NWO has ruined his life, the same NWO that has helped him sell lots of videos and sponsor time, seems like, well, a contradiction?

Not answering Mark Roberts questions of proving or providing a priori or a posteriori evidence of common truther claims at ground zero and chasing uniformed Marines out of a restaurant and down the street over accusations of black ops and the like doesn't help the "patriot truther" cause, does it?

Working for a gold broker (Ted Anderson) and claiming that a "better" paper fiat money system (only minus the Fed) would be better than a gold standard (re: A Case Against the Fed, What Government Has Done To Our Money, A Case For A 100% Gold Dollar) is probably not the best way to build credibility either, especially for someone who has actually read a few books that Ron Paul has read and has drawn from in terms of the field of money.

But he says constitution and bill of rights a lot. I like that.

He linked to my video of my skepticism over the 9-11 FEA work and NIST report. I like that also.

He supports Ron Paul (although not all of Ron's ideas). I really really like that a lot.

I guess if he'd simply humble himself (sure, that will happen), and eschew the conjecture of foreign offshore bank boogiemen, confine NWO talk to what is known about the PLAN for the NWO as opposed to the active and conniving back room full of cigar smoke "woo woo" NWO conspiracy everywhere bullshit, wild adolescent antics that can go on and on over mutliple segments, and obscence exaggeration...he'd be peaches and cream of all things conspiracy theory radio.
 
Back
Top