Alex Jones endorses Trump

[LibertyEagle]

It's really too bad that Rand avoided Alex Jones and gave the cold shoulder to his millions of followers. Would have been nice to have that enthusiasm and money. It looks like Rand tried to sell out, but nobody was buying.

Perhaps he didn't want dumbass and co running around with a Rand Paul for President sign in one hand and a "911 is an inside job" sign in the other; like what some of Alex's supporters did when Ron ran. Just sayin...

 

[erowe1]

It's really too bad that Rand avoided Alex Jones and gave the cold shoulder to his millions of followers.

I wasn't aware that Rand did that. But as we can now see, he was right to do it. AJ is no friend of liberty.

 

[LibertyEagle]

I think if both Ron and Alex Jones were on a ticket, some here would vote for Alex.

 

[juleswin]

It's really too bad that Rand avoided Alex Jones and gave the cold shoulder to his millions of followers. Would have been nice to have that enthusiasm and money. It looks like Rand tried to sell out, but nobody was buying.

Maybe he was just trying to avoid the damage to his brain cells that he would have sustained from listening to the inane ramblings of a mad man. The man is controlled opposition all the way. And for the paleocons and white nationalists who think this man was on your side, just go listen to the interview he did with David Duke. It should tell you all you need to know about him.

 

[NewRightLibertarian]

Maybe he was just trying to avoid the damage to his brain cells that he would have sustained from listening to the inane ramblings of a mad man. The man is controlled opposition all the way. And for the paleocons and white nationalists who think this man was on your side, just go listen to the interview he did with David Duke. It should tell you all you need to know about him.

Well, his three percent in the polls indicates that he made a huge strategic blunder regardless of your irrational hatred of Jones and his very influential radio show.

 

[LibertyEagle]

Well, his three percent in the polls indicates that he made a huge strategic blunder regardless of your irrational hatred of Jones and his very influential radio show.

3% or 10%. Both mean you LOSE.

 

[donnay]

 

[TomtheTinker]

Haven't watched aj in years. His good points are over shadowed by his attention grabbing, money hungry bull shit.

 

[TER]

Haven't watched aj in years. His good points are over shadowed by his attention grabbing, money hungry bull shit.

Yes. That and the fact that he is a paid shill.

 

[donnay]

 

[juleswin]

Well, his three percent in the polls indicates that he made a huge strategic blunder regardless of your irrational hatred of Jones and his very influential radio show.

Or maybe the establishment tool came into the race and sucked up all the non establishment voters that would have normally gravitated to Rand. Ofc, I cant really tell without some really nice controlled experiment. But my money is on Trump entrance into the race as opposed to Rand not coming to AJ's show being the biggest factor affecting his poll numbers.

Think of this, Trump showed up only once to the AJ's show and he is performing way better than Rand. In fact he was rising and rising in the polls before he showed up to his show and now that he has made an appearance on AJ's show, Cruz is catching up to him. See how I can use demonstrable facts to make a foolish correlation relation of 2 events that most likely are not related.

So keep believing your fantasy that Rand not appearing on his show had any significant effect of Rand's poll numbers.

 

[Peace&Freedom]

Yea, I am sure when Alex Jones turned against Debra Medina for not parroting his 9/11 conspiracy but somehow endorsed Trump for not even mentioning it. He doesn't partake in the liberty in fighting. He is just a victim of those mean divisive libertarians who just happen to see him for the fraud and sell he is.

Alex views Trump as being a straight shooter on those aspects of questioning 9-11 he chose to raise, whereas Medina changed her position on even calling for a new 9-11 inquiry under pressure. AJ specifically pointed out he was going after her for flip-flopping, and refused to treat a grassroots person with favoritism despite caving.

Well its a stupid conspiracy as stupid as the BBC reporting the collapse of building 7 before it collapsed. I want him to talk about controlled demolition. I would go as much as to say that the people who talk about the 2 irrelevant part of the story are actually hurting the 911 truth movement.

The point you are still avoiding is that Alex Jones Town bows to authoritarian powerful men like Truth. He never starts a fight with him, instead he starts one with a grassroot liberty candidate who at the time was threatening to unseat Gov Perry.

See above answer. Jones bows to honest straight shooting people, and lets them evolve to the full truth at their own pace. He decided not to bow to a turncoat on the issue who flipped as soon as the going got tough. Jones should consider running in 2020 as the liberty movement candidate, so we could all see a "Trump who's on our side" in action, facing down the insiders.

 

[juleswin]

See above answer. Jones bows to honest straight shooting people, and lets them evolve to the full truth at their own pace. He decided not to bow to a turncoat on the issue who flipped as soon as the going got tough. Jones should consider running in 2020 as the liberty movement candidate, so we could all see a "Trump who's on our side" in action, facing down the insiders.

David Duke is not a straight shooter right? then again, how are we even supposed to know if he is a straight shooter when he wouldn't allow the man to get a word out. The truth is that Alex Jones would have found another excuse to bash Medina. For whatever reason, he wanted Medina to lose which is why he started asking him about the stupid conspiracy theory question on his show. Mind you, the kind of questions he wouldn't dare ask Trump.

The man is such a hot head that he would let a personal beef about 911 conspiracy theory get in the way of a grassroot liberty candidate not getting into office. Sorry but a man with that attitude is a man that I don't want my candidate to pal around with.

 

[Krzysztof Lesiak]

Despite his flaws, I still like Alex Jones. He has helped wake up a lot of people. He's done some great interviews such as his one with Immortal Technique and more recently with Louis Farrakhan. I think part of the reason he's now supporting Trump is because he's trying to create an audience among Trump fans, which seem to be pretty numerous. Alex Jones' audience is definitively smaller than it used to be, at least when judging by the amount of views his YouTube channel's videos have been getting recently, so he can use all the viewers he can get. Michael Savage apparently endorsed both Ted Cruz and Rand Paul before Trump, while also saying Jim Webb was better than a lot of the Republican field. I think it's the same with Jones: he's still behind Rand Paul, but he sees Trump as a genuine populist (which he's not IMO) and sees him as a threat to the establishment. Plus, Rand's campaign will be probably be coming to an end after tonight if he performs in line with the polls - 5% or less.

 

[juleswin]

Despite his flaws, I still like Alex Jones. He has helped wake up a lot of people. He's done some great interviews such as his one with Immortal Technique and more recently with Louis Farrakhan. I think part of the reason he's now supporting Trump is because he's trying to create an audience among Trump fans, which seem to be pretty numerous. Alex Jones' audience is definitively smaller than it used to be, at least when judging by the amount of views his YouTube channel's videos have been getting recently, so he can use all the viewers he can get. Michael Savage apparently endorsed both Ted Cruz and Rand Paul before Trump, while also saying Jim Webb was better than a lot of the Republican field. I think it's the same with Jones: he's still behind Rand Paul, but he sees Trump as a genuine populist (which he's not IMO) and sees him as a threat to the establishment. Plus, Rand's campaign will be probably be coming to an end after tonight if he performs in line with the polls - 5% or less.

Essentially you are calling Alex Jones a sellout. Because he is losing viewer, he is selling out for viewers and youtube ad cent revenue? I thought Stefan Molyneux gave the best backhanded compliments but this is tremendously good. Also I noticed you did not add (which he's not IMO) after this quote "sees him as a threat to the establishment". Does it mean you agree that he is a threat to the republican establishment?

 

[NewRightLibertarian]

3% or 10%. Both mean you LOSE.

The front runners or near front runners are Trump and Sanders, two anti-establishment candidates running far outside the mainstream. So don't kid yourself, Paul's ceiling was much higher than 10 percent. But rather than taking his father's message to the next level, he watered it down instead. And as a result of this massive strategic blunder, so much momentum has been lost as a result. What an easily preventable shame.

 

[Brett85]

I agree. I listen to Alex Jones every day, he loves Rand........... doesn't think he will make it though. Rand is his first choice, Trump is his second. He does complain however, that Rand should learn how to man up and talk tough like Trump. He says he advised Rand to come out tough, manly, etc. He is also pissed that Rand went on the attack against Trump, rather than someone like Bushit.

I imagine that Rand attacked Trump because Trump is the most liberal candidate in the GOP race.

 

[Peace&Freedom]

David Duke is not a straight shooter right? then again, how are we even supposed to know if he is a straight shooter when he wouldn't allow the man to get a word out. The truth is that Alex Jones would have found another excuse to bash Medina. For whatever reason, he wanted Medina to lose which is why he started asking him about the stupid conspiracy theory question on his show. Mind you, the kind of questions he wouldn't dare ask Trump.

The man is such a hot head that he would let a personal beef about 911 conspiracy theory get in the way of a grassroot liberty candidate not getting into office. Sorry but a man with that attitude is a man that I don't want my candidate to pal around with.

The point is that an activist is supposed to have more backbone to stick to their guns, at least on a wimpy halfway position like supporting a new inquiry, not disintegrate after one bad interview. Jones waited ten days before publicly criticizing Medina, hardly the act of a hot head. If Jones was consumed with ratings or being pretend-opposition, as his defamers suggest, he would have supported Medina without calling her on her flip-flop. Doing so showed his beliefs take priority with him, over looking good.

The issue goes beyond a 'pet peeve,' it's about a false flag that has led to, or cost over 800,000 civilian lives (3,000 killed by elements of the US government on 9-11, the rest Mideast brown people). If Medina couldn't hang tough despite all that, maybe she shouldn't have won the election. The episode shows that AJ does have conviction, is the real deal, and ought to consider running himself in the future.

 

[juleswin]

The point is that an activist is supposed to have more backbone to stick to their guns, at least on a wimpy halfway position like supporting a new inquiry, not disintegrate after one bad interview. Jones waited ten days before publicly criticizing Medina, hardly the act of a hot head. If Jones was consumed with ratings or being pretend-opposition, as his defamers suggest, he would have supported Medina without calling her on her flip-flop. Doing so showed his beliefs take priority with him, over looking good.

The issue goes beyond a 'pet peeve,' it's about a false flag that has led to, or cost over 800,000 civilian lives (3,000 killed by elements of the US government on 9-11, the rest Mideast brown people). If Medina couldn't hang tough despite all that, maybe she shouldn't have won the election. The episode shows that AJ does have conviction, is the real deal, and ought to consider running himself in the future.

Medina is a first time candidate, a true woman of the people. Maybe she got rattled, maybe she changed her mind on running as a truther but regardless of the reason for her answers that day, there is not logical reason for Alex to throw her under the bus the way he did. Think of the cringe worthy interview Rand had with Rachel Maddow, just imagine if we all had jumped ship because of it. That is the hot head attitude that I am talking about.

Also if the death of 800k civilians is that important to him, how come he didn't ask Trump serious questions about it? At least get to on record on his beliefs about the attack. But ofc he won't do that. I have said it before and I'll say it again. If Rand or Ron ever came close to the white house, Alex Jones would turn on him. He is sparing those 2 right now cos they never really had that much of a chance of winning the general election for the POTUS.

 

[Theocrat]

"Hating the Establishment is Not the Same as Supporting Liberty"

Trump is not libertarian, but his candidacy (as I said) represents progress towards the cause of liberty by scuttling the elite's kingmaker system that has prevented alternative candidates from getting the Presidential nomination of a major party for at least 36 years. Liberty candidates cannot get into the White House until that elite-controlled, approved insider puppets system is disrupted. In Star Wars terms, we have to disable the tractor beam, to escape the Death Star. Voters are leaning towards Trump not because his views are vague, but because his resolve is convincing, and not controlled by mega-donors.

The GOP rank and file and public is frustrated with campaigns that have had the right positions for decades, but then caved or utterly failed to enact them once elected. The anti-establishment trend that Trump rode to first place with is thematically pro-liberty, as it confronts the statist/PC mainstream, shows resolve or backbone against it under pressure, and prioritizes cultural or domestic issues over war issues. This outsider dynamic can serve as a battering ram to knock down the establishment-dominated primary racket, and once knocked down will bring more liberty candidates into office over the long term.

Dude, you seriously need to read this.