Aldous Huxley's Brave New World (BNW)

[InterestedParticipant]

that's why we need technology, if we can use robots to replace humans, we not only don't need slaves, we don't need to work ourselves!

You've read Bill Joy's "Why the Future Doesn't Need Us," right?

 

[ramallamamama]

Nobody is suing the authors for libel.

http://www.mindspring.com/~txporter/sec3.htm

 

[InterestedParticipant]

I am afraid of nothing, son. I am not afraid to die, and I am certainly not afraid of a book I just read. I am not afraid it is going to make me into some zombie, or change my thoughts, because I bank a helluva a lot more on what I observe in life, then what I read in a book.

Your warnings are nothing but paranoid nonsense. Huxley was no agent, and if he was, sign me up for his agenda... because his book was fucking good. It was written in that puerile 1930's language, but the overall idea, (and I am not even sure exactly what that idea was) was thought provoking, to say the least.

Seeing a puppetmaster behind every creator, and warning about books to me is not thought provoking, it's just annoying and a form of severe paranoid jack-assery. Capice? I am pretty sure you have tons of posts on these forums warning everybody is an elite stand in. I have lived long enough to tell an honest man when I meet one (and there are not many), I don't need your stupid warnings that they are actually some kind of puppet. It's just stupid and a waste of time.

You are afraid of Reality!

That's okay... really, as reality is a very unnerving data set which is quite different than the Simulacrum you've grown up with. I haven't meant a human being yet that didn't experience major trauma as part of their new found awareness.

 

[Optatron]

You've read Bill Joy's "Why the Future Doesn't Need Us," right?

no, but I can guess what it's about.

 

[NewEnd]

What I am trying to point out is that these dystopic stories not only serve as warnings for the public, they also serve as predictive programming for the public (preparing the public to accept a given future) as well as instruction manual for the elite's technocracy.

Whatever. That is stupid on so many levels, I don't even know where to begin. A warning and a softening of the psyche? Seriously. That is stupid. I calls em as I sees em... and thats just plain dumb... and paranoid. (ive used htat word before, haven't I?)

If that is what happens, so be it, humans are irrational beings, and react differently to that same thing. If that is what you are just now figuring out, you still have a long road to wisdom.

It's like you are condemning ice cream, because even though it was made to taste good, some people get fat off it. No shit sherlock... got any more great insights for us?

Who introduced LSD into society and tested it on human subjects for its mind control value? Which part of society was interested in this subject matter?

The giubmit and hte CIA

What do you think Timothy Leary was? Who funded him and his promotion of LSD?

Got nay proof of that? Leary was an extension of MKUltra? Is that actually the shit you are trying to pitch?

Why was A. Huxley experimenting with LSD? Who was interested in the knowledge from that experimentation?

Same reason I experimented with it, I would suspect.

Finally, what is imperative here, and what is missing from the discussion, is the art of double speak and how this art form is employed in all elite writings, especially writing designed for the public. The exoteric is designed to remain hidden to all but the elite and their technocracy.

The elite and their technocracy.... wait... YOU are using doublespeak! OMG.... YOU are one of THEM!!!

You are afraid of Reality!

Know, I have a grip on it, which you obviously do not. Your enlightenment is nothing but a flashlight at the bottom of a well. (was that more doublespeak?... I am an agent!!!)

P.S. Have you even read the book?

 

[ramallamamama]

Whatever. That is stupid on so many levels, I don't even know where to begin. A warning and a softening of the psyche? Seriously. That is stupid. I calls em as I sees em... and thats just plain dumb... and paranoid. (ive used htat word before, haven't I?)

Have you researched any of the suff IP posted? Even one linky?

 

[InterestedParticipant]

Whatever. That is stupid on so many levels, I don't even know where to begin.

Please begin with Theordor Adorno's work at the Frankfurt Institute... this will explain how the culture industry is used in society by the designers of this industry. Adorno was not a stupid man.

 

[NewEnd]

Have you researched any of the suff IP posted? Even one linky?

I'm not patronizing this crap. I like the way ice cream tastes, I'm sorry if some people get fat from it. I've seen some of his other posts around here, according to him, everybody is some kind of stand in agent for them.. even Alex Jones. it's just so stupid and arrogant that he thinks he is the only one that can think for himself... he has somehow broke outside the matrix. Whatever.

 

[NewEnd]

Please begin with Theordor Adorno's work at the Frankfurt Institute... this will explain how the culture industry is used in society by the designers of this industry. Adorno was not a stupid man.

yeah, you obviously aren't stupid either, just incredibly unwise.

And you should read Huxley's work before you start spouting your theories on it.

 

[ramallamamama]

Eugenicist.

http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/adorno/1944/culture-industry.htm

 

[ramallamamama]

I'm not patronizing this crap. I like the way ice cream tastes, I'm sorry if some people get fat from it. I've seen some of his other posts around here, according to him, everybody is some kind of stand in agent for them.. even Alex Jones. it's just so stupid and arrogant that he thinks he is the only one that can think for himself... he has somehow broke outside the matrix. Whatever

Lol.

 

[NewEnd]

Ok, the intro film was dumb and patronizing. I don't care what huxleys brother in law was into, and I know what eugenics is, and trying to tie Huxley to the Nazis by a thrice removed guilt by association is a logical fallacy of terrible proportions. It's guitlt by association and Godwyn's law all wrapped into one. terrible, horrible conspiracy youtube fluff. The kind of cheap crap that is all over the internet, and completely useless.

 

[Optatron]

Ok, the intro film was dumb and patronizing. I don't care what huxleys brother in law was into, and I know what eugenics is, and trying to tie Huxley to the Nazis by a thrice removed guilt by association is a logical fallacy of terrible proportions.

glad I have a buddy on this board.

 

[ramallamamama]

Interesting, I've found these concepts to open new neuro pathways too.

 

[NewEnd]

glad I have a buddy on this board.

I love how the "documentary" maker, has to use complicated family trees, and point to shit his brother and cousin twice removed was into, like UNESCO and the WWF.

Well fuck, my sister is a total right wing Christian, that must mean everything I write on the internet is actually an underhanded ploy to get people to accept Christ as their personal savior.

It's just so fucking stupid. And you get some pseudo-intellectual like IP here, eating it up, because it somehow makes him feel like he has stepped outside, above, beyond his own cognizance (quoting Terence McKenna, probably another MKUltra agent )


Dammit, give me my 8 minutes and 22 seconds of life back! This guy spends more time slamming Huxley's relatives, than Huxley, or his book!

Oh God, here he goes again, slamming another relative. That's fucking great!! what a waste of my fucking time!!!

I swear to God, I am never reading or watching anything IP ever posts again!!! (Go with Christ, he can save your soul)

 

[Optatron]

I love how the "documentary" maker, has to use complicated family trees, and point to shit his brother and cousin twice removed was into, like UNESCO and the WWF.

Well fuck, my sister is a total right wing Christian, that must mean everything I write on the internet is actually an underhanded ploy to get people to accept Christ as their personal savior.

No, it doesn't work the other way!

You see? You can make the connection from KKK to Freemasons, but you're supposed to ignore than KKK uses crosses and claim to be Christian. Learn to think with multiple standards!

It's just so fucking stupid.

And these same people are telling us racism is bad?

And you get some pseudo-intellectual like IP here, eating it up, because it somehow makes him feel like he has stepped outside, above, beyond his own cognizance (quoting Terence McKenna, probably another MKUltra agent )

IP has said some interesting things. And pseudo-intellectuals? We have a lot of those here!

Dammit, give me my 8 minutes and 22 seconds of life back! This guy spends more time slamming Huxley's relatives, than Huxley, or his book!

Oh God, here he goes again, slamming another relative. That's fucking great!! what a waste of my fucking time!!!

just to be clear, in case we ever get there.

My point earlier is, I don't believe eugenics or NWO is completely or always bad.

 

[ramallamamama]

Good observtion!

Terence McKenna, yeah he's in on too.

 

[NewEnd]

just to be clear, in case we ever get there.

My point earlier is, I don't believe eugenics or NWO is completely or always bad.

Then you need to stop reading Huxley.

 

[Optatron]

Then you need to stop reading Huxley.

reading doesn't mean I'll agree.

 

[NewEnd]

reading doesn't mean I'll agree.

if you don't agree, then it was a warning. If you do agree, then it was a elite conspiracy to soften you up for the coming dystopia.