Albanian Muslims to be given Staten Island?

No. You are not understanding him correctly.
I don't think I am misunderstanding him.

Is diversity our strength? Or anybody’s strength, anywhere in the world? Does Japan’s homogeneous population cause the Japanese to suffer? Have the Balkans been blessed by their heterogeneity — or does the very word “Balkanization” remind us of centuries of strife, bloodshed and unspeakable atrocities, extending into our own times?
 
No. I'm not the one being obtuse. You brought up communism in a thread about immigration which was only at that point and I asked you an OBVIOUS question that was connected to it. I didn't put in words in your mouth. There is no HONEST way you can claim I did.

And yet @Brian4Liberty specifically came back with his "people from India are more likely to be communist" retort which 100% undermines your argument, then he tries to cover with a "Readers Digest condensed summary: sophistry." comment. Here's another saying. "Don't piss on me and tell me it's raining." Or another cliche'. "If the shoe doesn't fit, don't wear it." You could have brought up the fact that the American Revolution was fought by a minority of people as well. You chose to go with a negative example. And the comparison doesn't hold when it comes to immigration anyway because there are different immigrant groups coming to America that don't all share the same agenda. Indian Hindus have a completely different perspective than Pakistani Muslims and are unlikely to have common cause on anything except conservative family values and supporting H1B visas.

And even if YOU aren't looking at this from a racial angle, other's are. (Again, Brian's unsubstantiated comment about Indians and communism). Anyhow, I've made my point. The obsession of race when it comes to immigration is toxic to this movement even if you don't have that position yourself. In a movement that pushes "individualism" on the surface there is an undercurrent of collectivism right beneath it.

At the beginning of this movement people worried about the 9/11 truthers driving folks away. I personally never ran into that. I remember at one meetup, our meetup leader Cheryl worrying about that and I privately told her I was a truther. (That must be how a gay person feels coming out of the closet). She was taken about, then just said "Well I just have a heard time believing our government would do that." That's fine.

I do know the race issue has driven people away. Around he same time there was a very enthusiastic mixed race couple (white man, black woman) that were initially at all the meetups. I remember them because the husband was a Ruby On Rails developer and we had talked about putting our head together to build a social media about to reward people for activism. Well one day a discussion came up about what to do regarding the racist newsletters. They hadn't even HEARD about that. That was the last time I saw them. I know some here reject the idea that "diversity is strength" and @CaptUSA bought into the BS from Thomas Sowell that somehow Japan is better by being a homogeneous society. (Japan is dying on the vine with young men not even wanting to get married). I think Capt means well. I think YOU and Brian mean well. I think Thomas Sowell is "so smart he's stupid." A black man in a majority white country asking for homogeneity? Why hasn't he moved to Ghana then? This forum is much less diverse than it used to be. I remember when there were a few feminists who openly posted and at least one transgender. At times I wasn't the only black person posting. It could be the homogeneity has simply come from attrition but I don't think it's made this movement stronger by any stretch of the imagination.

Geezum crow! 🤣

me: *merely makes a simple, obvious, and historically-supported point about how majorities are not required in order to "take over"*

jmdrake: *shoehorns in everything but the kitchen sink - including things said by other posters, about which I have said nothing at all - in order to pretend I said or meant anything other than what I plainly and actually said and meant*
You are just being quarrelsome for the sake of being quarrelsome.

(You must drive opposing counsel nuts with this kind of stuff. :tears:)

I've already wasted far more time on this nonsense than it deserves, so I'm not going to waste any more.

Have a nice day. :)
 
Last edited:
I don't think I am misunderstanding him.

Is diversity our strength? Or anybody’s strength, anywhere in the world? Does Japan’s homogeneous population cause the Japanese to suffer? Have the Balkans been blessed by their heterogeneity — or does the very word “Balkanization” remind us of centuries of strife, bloodshed and unspeakable atrocities, extending into our own times?
Man, you're a glutton for this stuff, huh? Do you really want to understand or are you trying to win some internet squabble? Because if you want to understand, I'd suggest reading some of his books with the detailed research he's done.

But read what you posted again... And think about it without your preconceived notions.

He's making the case that the phrase, "diversity is our strength" is fact-free dogma and he countered that premise. He never once intimated that homogeneity is strength.

In that same article, he writes, "America’s great good fortune in the past has been that Americans have been able to unite as Americans against every enemy, despite our own internal differences and struggles. Black and white, Jew and Gentile, have fought and died for this country in every war. It has not been our diversity, but our ability to overcome the problems inherent in diversity, and to act together as Americans, that has been our strength."
 
Man, you're a glutton for this stuff, huh? Do you really want to understand or are you trying to win some internet squabble? Because if you want to understand, I'd suggest reading some of his books with the detailed research he's done.

But read what you posted again... And think about it without your preconceived notions.

He's making the case that the phrase, "diversity is our strength" is fact-free dogma and he countered that premise. He never once intimated that homogeneity is strength.

In that same article, he writes, "America’s great good fortune in the past has been that Americans have been able to unite as Americans against every enemy, despite our own internal differences and struggles. Black and white, Jew and Gentile, have fought and died for this country in every war. It has not been our diversity, but our ability to overcome the problems inherent in diversity, and to act together as Americans, that has been our strength."
Except he never actually countered the premise. Think about it. Is Japan REALLY doing that good when it's population is crashing? Unlike the United States Japan cannot make up for a crashing population through immigration because its seen as unwelcoming due to the very homogeneity that Sowell is discounting as "fact-free dogma" (your words). He discounts the "problems inherent in homogeneity" because he throws out the idea that Japan is doing "great." The other weakness in his argument is the idea that the Balkans are in poor shape because of diversity and multiculturalism when the opposite is true. They have the very "ethnic enclaves" that some here seem to crave. That's not "diversity." It's tribalism. And the problems in America he wrongly attributes to "inherent in diversity" are really artificially created by tribalism. Prior to Bacon's Rebellion, blacks and whites were getting along okay in Virginia, but racial distinctions were put in place in order to "divide and conquer."


It took nearly 300 years after that, with multiple massacres and ethnic cleansings that your article by Sowell glosss over as "problems" to get to some sense of equilibrium.

I saw a video (I wish I could find it) where a woman from the Balkans explained how after the fall of communism the national socialists in the various enclaves got the people to want to kill each other again. It's similar to what I'm seeing now on both sides of the racial divide where every death is framed in terms of which member of which group killed a member of the other group. I'm sorry you can't see what's really happening. I truly am. But these aren't "inherent problems." They're manufactured.
 
Geezum crow! 🤣
me: *merely makes a simple, obvious, and historically-supported point about how majorities are not required in order to "take over"*
jmdrake: *shoehorns in everything but the kitchen sink - including things said by other posters about which I have said nothing at all - in order to pretend I said or meant anything other than what I plainly and actually said and meant*
You are just being quarrelsome for the sake of being quarrelsome.

(You must drive opposing counsel nuts with this kind of stuff. :tears:)

I've already wasted far more time on this nonsense than it deserves, so I'm not going to waste any more.

Have a nice day. :)
I had a response but you know what? Screw it. Have a nice day.
 
Last edited:
JM, You're confusing ethnic diversity with cultural diversity. And yes, tribalism is a problem inherent in cultural diversity. We even have the phrase "culture clash" to describe it.

Just read the whole article.

https://www.creators.com/read/thomas-sowell/06/16/will-orlando-change-anything#google_vignette
I've read the whole article AGAIN and my opinion of it remains the same. Sometimes I've been impressed with Thomas Sowell. This doesn't happen to be one of those times. Back in what he apparently considers the "good old days" (Jim Crowe), immigration wasn't based on "Who's less likely to be criminal" as he seems to imply or else the Irish and the Italians would not have been let it. "Oh. Let's look at who has 85% decent people as opposed to 95% decent people." Ummmm.....what? What is sad is that you're endorsing collectivism under the guise of statistical sophistry. And the goalposts are always changing. Vivek Ramaswamy and Elon Musk stirred up waves by pushing a "white people are lazy" narrative in support of H1B visas for Asians. Using the "85% / 95%" argument, Thomas Sowell should be arguing for MORE H1B visas, but I don't see that. If you have a source where Mr. Sowell advocates for increasing H1B visas, as Rand Paul has done, please provide it. It's not that I support H1B visas. I could care less one way or the other. I'm just wondering if he is ideologically consistent where so many other people or not. Also here is a rebuttal article to what Mr. Sowell says on immigration. I read your article. You can read mine.

 
Oh, the irony... Have a good day.
You asked me to read the article. I read it and responded. I asked you to read the article I gave in response. You say "the irony." :rolleyes: I'm not sure what goalpost has moved on my part but okay. Here is "the irony." Everybody is all into statistics until they don't fit. Even though the Springfield Haitians come from a country will a helluva a crime problem they themselves have not been a cause of crime as shown by the statistics. Yet, nobody on the "anti-diversify is our strength" crowd seems even willing to admit that. I find all of these xenophobic arguments disingenuous at this point. Have a good day as well.
 
No evidence yet that he is Albanian or Muslim...

"We join the Bath Beach community in welcoming Captain Mohammed S. Islam, a 17 year veteran of the NYPD, as the newly appointed as the Commanding Officer of Brooklyn’s 62nd Precinct."


 
"Giving Palestinians a state is like giving al-Qaeda a state one mile from New York. It's madness, and we won't do it. Israel will not allow you to force a state down our throats. We will not agree to national suicide."

-Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
 
No evidence yet that he is Albanian or Muslim...

"We join the Bath Beach community in welcoming Captain Mohammed S. Islam, a 17 year veteran of the NYPD, as the newly appointed as the Commanding Officer of Brooklyn’s 62nd Precinct."




Promotion by weight.

Triple chins: check.

Pregnant appearance: check.

Man boobs: check.

Way to "assimilate" there Mohammed.
 
Back
Top