Alabama Tried A Donald Trump-Style Immigration Law, It Failed In A Big Way

[AuH20]

The United States has a limit - a policy - that immigration from no one nation should exceed 7% . . .

Why would Mexico or Mexicans think it is cool idea to come to the United States above that amount . . .? Answer : because they can get away with it, for now anyway.

Bringing that up is racist.

 

[RonPaulMall]

Do they think we should be free market capitalists but be against a free market in labor? I don't understand the inconsistency.

People are not shoes. You can't toss them in the garbage when you are done with them. And between the government subsidies that encourage immigration and the government criminalization of any form free association which might serve to mitigate it, we are hardly talking about a "free market" in labor to begin with.

 

[Sola_Fide]

People are not shoes. You can't toss them in the garbage when you are done with them. And between the government subsidies that encourage immigration and the government criminalization of any form free association which might serve to mitigate it, we are hardly talking about a "free market" in labor to begin with.

Should there be a free market in labor?

 

[Hoax]

Do you think that the police state is the best way in solving the immigration issuse?

What a joke calling it a police state. Does the United States not have the authority to defend it borders? Does enforcing the law ipso facto mean that it is a police state?

 

[Sola_Fide]

What a joke calling it a police state. Does the United States not have the authority to defend it borders? Does enforcing the law ipso facto mean that it is a police state?

Does Indiana have the right to police it's borders and keep Kentuckians out? Or are people free?

 

[Hoax]

Does Indiana have the right to police it's borders and keep Kentuckians out? Or are people free?

That is a nonsensical conflation, par for the course for you. It is extremely clear you do oppose the entire concept of the nation state, and you've never even so much as given a second thought to the constitution of a country you feel may as well not even exist.

 

[Sola_Fide]

That is a nonsensical conflation, par for the course for you. It is extremely clear you do oppose the entire concept of the nation state, and you've never even so much as given a second thought to the constitution of a country you feel may as well not even exist.

Whoa hold on. Why is it "nonsensical"? I'm not necessarily objecting to nation state, just as I am not objecting to Indiana's borders.

Are people free or not?

 

[Christian Liberty]

As a fellow theonomist put it "Borders are for defining the jurisdictional limits of the State, not for restricting individual movement." I agree.

 

[r3volution 3.0]

You have the same problem as Trump. You whine about "illegals" getting welfare benefits or government schooling when instead you should be attacking the real problem: the existence of government schools and the welfare state.

That is the difference between the nationalism you are proposing and the freedom and liberty that I am proposing.

Precisely

Do they think we should be free market capitalists but be against a free market in labor? I don't understand the inconsistency.

People are not shoes. You can't toss them in the garbage when you are done with them. And between the government subsidies that encourage immigration and the government criminalization of any form free association which might serve to mitigate it, we are hardly talking about a "free market" in labor to begin with.

Right, a free labor market would be nice, but since the labor market is not entirely free now, we should make it less free.

...makes sense