I suppose
Barrington Ill. is pretty "low life" eh?
I lived there until the 60's only my dad would use his belt for major infractions...
See, this is what I was talking about.
I guess I will have to ask again: How many times did you have wide, bloody, livid welts on your four-year-old self a week after the punishment? How many times did your dad's belt split your scrotum? How many times did he shove sticks/leaves in your mouth so you wouldn't scream while he was doing it?
The response to "um this looks rather extreme" isn't "well something less extreme happened to me as a child (but older than this child) so I don't get the fuss."
I don't think spanking is abuse. What I saw in the pics was excessive but not abuse. It was some scratches from a branch. There was no need to get the government involved and from what I read he already knew he went too far.
“Got him in nuts once I noticed. But I felt so bad, n I’m all tearing that butt up when needed! I start putting them in timeout. N save the whooping for needed memories!”
Peterson's son had pushed another one of his kids off a video game to prompt the punishment, according to the report.
Well as long as it was a godawful offense that prompted being hit with a switch over... and over... and over....
* * *
Oh and back to the "well the child won't do THAT again" logic? If that's really the only end goal you could just kill the child. Stupid? Yeah. That's why it's not a logical justification here. I don't think a four-year-old is even likely to associate pushing another child with getting these injuries. If they do, then I wince to think of what else they'll never do purely out of fear. Some of you are the same ones that bemoan kids not going out and being allowed to play. Shoving one another --- within reason --- was always part of that. Man I hope this kid never grows up to be in a game where he shoves other similarly-sized people around and gets paid for it. How pissed would Adrian Peterson be then!
And no, before it starts flying around again, I don't really think the police needed to be in on this one, though most of you are missing a buried lesson here. He "cooperated" so it doesn't look like there'll be much to this (there shouldn't be). What if he didn't cooperate to the opinion of the police? Would there be such an outpouring of "this is just a loving daddy disciplining his son"? Or would people react more along the lines of calling him a thug? What if there had been a "gun in the home"? More importantly, what if this were you or me discovered after the fact with a child whose skin looked like that and who we'd admitted to "whooping"? I don't think we'd be holding a single press conference on it.
And in the end, the kid is going to wind up with a spotlight on him, the mother is apparently suspected by some people of orchestrating the whole thing (don't see how that's even a little likely), and nothing is fixed or resolved in the entire matter.