Adherence to the Oath-RevPAC 60 Second Ad

[gb13]

That is such an amazing ad. We should really help them out as much as possible with this one...

 

[BLS]

I'm deployed, with a wife, 2 kids, and one on the way waiting on me back home. I'm enlisted, so I don't make very much, and I have a lot of bills to pay.....yet I still manage to donate $100 during every moneybomb. It may not be much compared to what some give, but its a lot to me...and I do take pride in the fact that every time I donate I make Ron Paul's active military donations go up just a little bit more. Hell, I've already donated more to Ron Paul than a couple candidates have received TOTAL from active military. LOL

+Rep. Thank you for your service and your sacrifices for Liberty.
I will donate $100 (my first) to Ron Paul on Sunday on your behalf.

 

[AdamT]

Bump

 

[Lord Xar]

Maybe santa rita will contribute to getting this ad out there.. adam perhaps you can contact them

 

[ItsTime]

It is a great ad, but like I suggested on facebook. In the future RevPac needs to stagger their requests for donations. Please plan ahead just a little better so there are no overlaps.

 

[maninblack]

How much does it cost to run a 1:00 ad (ballpark)?

 

[parocks]

i love this ad so much! not to detract anything from the santa rita pac, but i wish they'd spent their 300k promoting this ad

I prefer the Santa Rita Pac's ad.

I do like how RevPAC fixed the spelling. The 2 minute version had Airforce. This version has Air Force.

I believe that Air Force is correct.

 

[parocks]

It is a great ad, but like I suggested on facebook. In the future RevPac needs to stagger their requests for donations. Please plan ahead just a little better so there are no overlaps.

Super PAC should not be asking normal folks to donate. Normal folks should be donating to the campaign.

What I really like about Santa Rosa PAC is that they did not come here and try to shift our resources from the official campaign to them. They understand that superpacs is supposed to come from maxed out people.

 

[Lord Xar]

Super PAC should not be asking normal folks to donate. Normal folks should be donating to the campaign.

What I really like about Santa Rosa PAC is that they did not come here and try to shift our resources from the official campaign to them. They understand that superpacs is supposed to come from maxed out people.

I do agree that RevPac could solicit big name donors, but there is the idea that we are not privvy to such things. They might have contacted a whole slew of people, and the well is dry. With how the media creates the narrative, it would probably be hard for most celebs to fully get on board. Alot of possible blowback from the lib/left entertainment industry. But yeah, perhaps they can try harder - I don't know. But given the level of product they are putting out and those associated with RevPac, I'm sure they are going down what avenues are available for them.

But I think most people will understand the priority and give to the campaign first, RevPac second. Who knows. Let people decide on who they will support with getting the message out.

Also, Santa Rita is funded by a wealthy person. They don't need to solicit for outside resources.

 

[AdamT]

If we had millionaires banging down our door do you think I'd be bumping this thread?

Need donations now to air in SC. www.revolutionpac.com/adherence

Know rich RP supporters? Send them the link ASAP.

 

[parocks]

I do agree that RevPac could solicit big name donors, but there is the idea that we are not privvy to such things. They might have contacted a whole slew of people, and the well is dry. With how the media creates the narrative, it would probably be hard for most celebs to fully get on board. Alot of possible blowback from the lib/left entertainment industry. But yeah, perhaps they can try harder - I don't know. But given the level of product they are putting out and those associated with RevPac, I'm sure they are going down what avenues are available for them.

But I think most people will understand the priority and give to the campaign first, RevPac second. Who knows. Let people decide on who they will support with getting the message out.

Also, Santa Rita is funded by a wealthy person. They don't need to solicit for outside resources.

I don't mean famous people. I mean maxed out people. Rich people. People who can afford to give them 10K or 100K. I'm not sure where you're getting celebs from. And if we have celebs, we really want the celebs to do things like work for us for pay, rather than to give us money.

Right, wealthy people. You got it. Super PAC = wealthy people. You're getting it. No wealthy people = no super PAC.

 

[pulp8721]

I do agree that RevPac could solicit big name donors, but there is the idea that we are not privvy to such things. They might have contacted a whole slew of people, and the well is dry. With how the media creates the narrative, it would probably be hard for most celebs to fully get on board. Alot of possible blowback from the lib/left entertainment industry. But yeah, perhaps they can try harder - I don't know. But given the level of product they are putting out and those associated with RevPac, I'm sure they are going down what avenues are available for them.

But I think most people will understand the priority and give to the campaign first, RevPac second. Who knows. Let people decide on who they will support with getting the message out.

Also, Santa Rita is funded by a wealthy person. They don't need to solicit for outside resources.

Maybe he can recommend some of his friends who didn't donate to RITA PAC to Rev PAC .

 

[parocks]

Maybe he can recommend some of his friends who didn't donate to RITA PAC to Rev PAC .

And he would do that because?

 

[spudea]

yes yes yes play this far and wide!

 

[lbadragan]

Fantastic ad!

 

[Jandrsn21]

Wow!

 

[InTradePro]

Bump

 

[jasonxe]

what about the google thing. Also can Santa Rita pac use this ad?

 

[Cigaboo]

I think this is a brilliant ad. It reaffirms support for his non-interventionist foreign policy, demonstrates his support by the military, and exposes the shady donor sources for other candidates in one fell swoop! Would love to have people see this. I'm donating, though I can only afford a little.

 

[harikaried]

It doesn't really highlight non-interventionist foreign policy as much as a constitutional one. No?