AC360 CNN - Bashing Ron

[kr1963]

go here as well CNN

The Rachel Maddow Show

Ed Schultz

 

[kr1963]

Austin NAACP President Nelson Linder, who has known Ron Paul for 20 years, unequivocally dismissed charges that the Congressman was a racist in light of recent smear attempts, and said the reason for him being attacked was that he was a threat to t...

From the chat

 

[Dary]

As for me. I cannot tell you how proud I am right now to be a Ron Paul supporter.
These so-called attacks by the MSM are music to my ears. Beautiful music.

Do I want the establishment media's endorsement? No. Why would I?

The establishment media has done nothing but promote the establishment agenda and WAR for as long as I can remember.

I don't want them saying good things about Ron. If they did THEN I would be suspicious. Unless they have a complete change of heart and repentance (which ain't gonna happen).

I know I'm on the right side cuz of their very coverage. These so-called attacks both solidify in my mind that I am right in what I believe and give comfort to my heart knowing that I'm doing the right thing.

The establishment media needs dismissing. They are worthy of dismissing. I loved the fact that Ron took off his mic and dismissed them.

The establishment has not, and cannot lay a finger on him. They would need some moral authority themselves in order to make an accusation justly. They have relinquished that authority loooong ago.

The establishment is over.

Ron Paul has already changed the course of human history, and he hasn't even gotten started yet.

Change the world Ron Paul.

 

[redbluepill]

I said this in the other thread

Yeah Dondero is a douche

 

[helmuth_hubener]

Settle down already. Don't you see I'm on your side? I want to see him win. Ron Paul's converts are going to stick by him no matter what happens on this issue. But this could seriously hurt his recruitment of others who are on the fence. And I have done my research, Rockwell has been fingered by many close to the Paul camp as the ghostwriter. http://reason.com/archives/2008/01/16/who-wrote-ron-pauls-newsletter

I do not think you are on my side. You have clearly done little or no actual research. You have read biased second and third-hand materials from people with agendas (a big part of which agenda is hating Ron Paul and Lew Rockwell, BTW), but have you read the primary source material? Why don't you go read about 100 of the back-issues of the newsletter, then about 100 Lew Rockwell articles, then tell me that there's any reason at all to finger him. Especially since HE HAS DENIED WRITING THE RACIAL STATEMENTS in question. That should be the end of it. Case closed.

If you are a sincere Ron Paul supporter, think quietly to yourself for a couple days what would be the likely outcome of further, umm, "revelations" in this case. Versus the likely outcome if no further information is forthcoming. You may think back to the coverage of Michael Jackson's death for an example of what happens when a steady harvest of new revelations are coming to light. You may think back to some short-lived and boring story you don't even remember, e.g. Mitt Romney with the dog carrier on the roof, for an example of a story attempted to be blown out of proportion and sensationalized, and then dropped due to nothing new to say and thus total boringness and no one caring.

 

[heavenlyboy34]

Yeah I read from c4ss.org at least a few times a week. People may be surprised how much they may agree with Kevin Carson, Sheldon Richman, and Roderick Long.

I agree. Those guys put out a lot of great stuff.