ABC plans to ignore RP on Feb 5th (proof enclosed)

We have to blast them with emails and phone calls so that we get publicity out of this just like when faux excluded Ron in the NH debate. Ron Paul already has hired a new media consultant, but even before this guy was hired, is no excuse not to invite Ron Paul. They can do whatever they want, and unless we put enormous pressure on them, we won't get any publicity out of this.

We want people to start saying "Why is this guy not at the debates?" I know several people who are not going to vote for Ron Paul but say they really enjoy his participation in the debates.
 
I wrote ABC, but copied NBC, CBS and a few newspapers as well. I was polite and did include Edwards in the exclusion, because it's the right thing to do.
 
emailed the lot of 'em for all the good it'll do.

I'm still saying... DRP needs to seriously bypass the MSM and hit the local radio and tv shows HARD. I can't fathom a local station that wouldn't love to interview a presidential candidate.
 
It's so obvious that a top down order was given to all establishment news outlets. There collusion is very apparent and in my opinion leaves very little doubt that there is a conspiracy to silence the truth.
 
Uh Oh. They better know its on like red dawn.

Just a reminder if you will be calling/emaling be polite but insistant. Being rude has negative effects on the perception of RP.
 
Here's the copypasta of my email, feel free to critique it:

Dear Mr. Salinger,

I came across your web page outlining your planned coverage of the Super Tuesday primaries on February 5th. I must tell you that I was very disappointed to see that you have no plans of giving equal coverage to my candidate of choice Dr. Ron Paul. This strikes me as odd considering Dr. Paul's recent showings in LA and NV, plus the fact that he has finished better than Rudy Giuliani in nearly every state so far. As I'm sure you must know he has raised more money than any other GOP candidate in the past few months and continues to do so. It's also well known that he has the largest and most involved grassroots following of any candidate, Republican or Democrat.

Since the mission of a news organization is to inform the curious masses it seems logical that you would cover the candidate with the largest and most interested group of supporters. Unfortunately we Ron Paul supporters have become accustomed to being ignored by the media and as a result we are often forced to resort to boycotts. It's a shame that we need to go to that extreme, but it is our position of last resort. Have no doubt that a large number of our supporters will boycott your sponsors if you elect to omit coverage of Dr. Paul.


Was that too much including the comment about boycotting?
 
Email sent.

I asked them why they are excluding Ron Paul (2 Primary 2nd Places) while they are covering Rudy (Not even a top three finish yet)
 
Until RP hires professional media people and consultants with contacts in the business he won't ever get any coverage.

I think they have advisor's by now, but not enough pull to go against the establishment. But you're right, this campaign was never geared to compete at the national level. RP said so himself, he thought he would manage this campaign from his friends apartment. The truth of the matter is people are a lot more disenchanted with the establishment, and they are ready for the message, but unfortunately the message was not ready for them is my opinion.

Now since we are black-balled, it will be harder to overcome this tremendous disadvantage. This movement is the type that will take years to build, and years to get power back to the people. The brainwashing runs deep, and the deprogramming of that takes even longer. We only have awakened the people that were already awake, and now to get to the people still sleeping we need the media, because that is all they are conditioned to obey. I do hope we attempt at a third party candidacy because thinking in realistic terms, without the media behind us, even giving us a half a chance, we won't get far, unless the supporters we do have become true revolutionaries.



It is hard to free fools from the chains they revere- Voltaire
 
We have to blast them with emails and phone calls so that we get publicity out of this just like when faux excluded Ron in the NH debate. Ron Paul already has hired a new media consultant, but even before this guy was hired, is no excuse not to invite Ron Paul. They can do whatever they want, and unless we put enormous pressure on them, we won't get any publicity out of this.

We want people to start saying "Why is this guy not at the debates?" I know several people who are not going to vote for Ron Paul but say they really enjoy his participation in the debates.



At this stage, and with their decisiveness in regards to silencing RP, it will require massive effort, or causing some serious mischief to get our way. These master tacticians that have tried to derail and silence the RP campaign have managed to take the wind out of the grassroots. What is needed is some young/loud voices to pick up the torch, and actually use it.
 
Back
Top