There are 3 basics amendments needed to prepare the people for proper participation in Article V. They deal with opening up the peoples information systems for the peoples purposes.
Basically all informations systems are the peoples first. Without this, dark organizations of control contrary to survival and evolution can prolificate within them and people cannot counter the darkness. Even those living in the dark suffer eventually from that. They might not care, but people do.
The 3 amendments first end the abridging of the ultimate PURPOSE of free speech, then secure the vote and reform campaign finance.
Since revision of the 1st amendment us viewed with such great contention, I've written a draft of where I think it should go. The others might best be effected in ways I do not well know of within our systems so I haven't bothered to draft amendments there. Others who know those systems far better will produce the best results.
REV. Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; Congress shall see that nothing abridges the freedom of speech and the primary methods or systems of it shall not be abridged and be first accessible for the purpose of the unity of the people in order to alter or abolish government destructive to their unalienable rights, or with its possible greater meaning through understanding one another in; forgiveness, tolerance, acceptance, respect, trust, friendship and love protecting life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Congress shall see that nothing abridges freedom of the press in its service to the unity of the people; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances or defense of this constitution.
There is also proposed legislation for states created to become compliant. It uses state power over corporate licensure in states to compel broadcast networks to produce qualifying informations.
To qualify, a subject or information must be NOT widely available in its nature, or be so unknown that most people cannot come up with search terms. It also must be something that cannot be promoted within the average persons economic means on a scale justifying its relationship to common interests of defending vital rights.
A petition to a state legislator with a yet to be determined number of signatures which is then carried to a state Supreme Court for the production of a court order to the largest television broadcast corporation to produce a 1/2 hour or 2 hour production at current audience production standards. That is to be broadcast nationally on their network to prime time audiences for a yet to be determined number of times and repetitive schedule OR contingent upon testing of public awareness and understanding of the subject matter.
We enter into the mystical again, IF there is a collective unconscious. Is support the prime intents of the constitution, of Americans conscious AND unconscious the question? If so, the latter will be hard to measure. Your notes on the timing of your composition of post #5 and agreeing with the prime constitutional intent I've set forth is as good a measure of the latter as anything.
We now find again an area of mysticism and conspiracy.
A book titled "The Hundredth Monkey" is missing from our planet. The original was published in 1962 by 23 Japanese biologists with no marketing or publicity. It was replaced by a book of the same name in 1974 written by Ken Keyes. The original was only published in 2 printings of a total of 20k copies. The replacement was published in the millions and heavily publicized. Today people only know of the replacement, not if the original which was SCIENCE documenting dream state communication between primates on a remote South Pacific island.
The replacement marginalized the phenomena by associating it with a politically charged issue relating to nuclear weapons while completely leaving out the science,
I'm sure you will agree that a conspiracy doing such a thing is of the darkest possible intentions.
There is at least one copy left on the planet and I read it. Where it went, I don't know. I read it in 1988 and did not know its full
Importance until 1998. By then the person that compelled me (yes, compelled) to read it had forgotten they ever had it. Memory, it turns out, consistently plays a major role in our evolution. It is basically controlled from the unconscious mind and in the 3rd .pdf of those posted in your 9/11 thread you will find a concept I've developed and graphically positioned called the "resolute barrier" which I believe can or mostly controls our ability to remember things.
The basics I've come to understand from the reading of the original "hundredth monkey" which I returned a few days after to read a second time, realizing how profound the research was are as follows after integrating a number if other aspects into one, whole concept.
There are 2 states. Of consciousness for living things. both are collective AND individual. Mammals have a significantly greater individual existence as groups of different genera.
Humans collective conscious comprises waking state communications of ALL types. Human collective unconscious communications have 2 types. One is individual telepathic emission which may reach many perceivers, not all necessarily need to be present, and the other is dream state communication which may be global or universal depending on the importance of it to life in the universe, to God.
The original book was obviously removed to prevent humanity from being aware of dream state influences upon conscious waking state performance. The design was to influence humanity without it conscious awareness and essentially de evolve its conscious performance and make it more controlled centering material power within specific groups of people for their purposes.
I noticed your timetable of 2 millennia in the Rabbis writings, corresponding to the influence of Christ as well as Jewish events in the later 1960's that may correspond.
There are at least 2 significant scientists that read the original book and incorporate its information in speculative advancement of the potentials. One is Rupert Sheldrake and the other I shall find the name of an edit it in to this paragraph with some specifics after I re find the info.
Accordingly, I have no idea of how many supporters of the 2 prime constitutional intents there are. I have to assume, that naturally, unconsciously, because those intents are developed human social natural law, that a large percentage of the planets human beings are supporters.
The sacred task is to make that support conscious and active socially.
I could not even venture a hues as to how many conscious supporters there are. I would speculate there are very many. Most however are very likely wrestling with their resolute barrier and fears created by the same dark forces using dream state manipulation over time, as well as conscious collective manipulation, misinformation, misleading, corruptive influences etc., that removed the original book.
The prime dream state directive programmed into populations is,
Thou shalt not be causal to change." That unconscious directive is socially reinforced in a myriad of different ways with unconscious conditioning of social fears.
I shall be truthful here. You are unique and the first to accept it with the full cognition you exhibit.
I thank God, and you!
Your cognitive capacities and spiritually positive focus are exceptional so I anticipate some very interesting correlations in the mystical realm related to 9/11 and your interpretations of the a Rabbis writings.
I do believe that there is an unconscious barrier to the support which exists unconsciously here and elsewhere. Since we are both cognitively addressing the constitutions intent as well as what support for it may exist, how it may exist, I can only surmise the barrier is breaking down.
Unconscious social fears assimilated at childhood control us all, with UNDERSTANDING all fears can be properly dealt with.
Your post #5 and the issue of "reputation" as well as the covert infiltrations group impositions of social fear structures invoking individual conditioning is certainly relevant to "how many" conscious supporters there are, or could be.
Was that the salon.com link on cognitive infiltration?