<9/13/08> Who Are You Voting For?

[JosephTheLibertarian]

The way I see it.... You ought to be dedicating 40% of your time on Baldwin and only 9% on Nader (27% on Paul)

I supported RP. He ended his bid...

 

[Kludge]

I supported RP. He ended his bid...

Apparently others haven't received the message. You need to allocate 27% of the time you're on here to bashing Paul and Paultards.... Unless you're a conformist!

 

[DAFTEK]

Nader supports it. Anyway, are you writing in RP? I just can't resist pouncing on Naderites. Nader, you make it too damn easy

I was going to write in, not sure how as i never did it, but after RP gave his speech why we should vote 3rd party it made so much sense, don't you think? Anyways, it's better then write in or staying home.....

 

[JosephTheLibertarian]

Apparently others haven't received the message. You need to allocate 27% of the time you're on here to bashing Paul and Paultards.... Unless you're a conformist!

The only thing I have to say to writein people is.... write-ins don't count, a candidate can't win with write-ins. And what will you do if RP isn't a write-in in your state?

But that's fine. I tolerate write-in peeps much more than I tolerate nader and baldwin supporters

 

[JosephTheLibertarian]

I was going to write in, not sure how as i never did it, but after RP gave his speech why we should vote 3rd party it made so much sense, don't you think? Anyways, it's better then write in or staying home.....

I'd advise you to write-in before you ever vote for Nader.

 

[Kludge]

The only thing I have to say to writein people is.... write-ins don't count, a candidate can't win with write-ins. And what will you do if RP isn't a write-in in your state?

But that's fine. I tolerate write-in peeps much more than I tolerate nader and baldwin supporters

I didn't know there was a tolerance grayness.

You can tolerate someone more then someone else?

 

[DAFTEK]

BTW: i don't care for Nader and know very little about him, but the fact that he sat down with RP on CNN and called for all to vote 3rd party changed my mind in a heart beat. First time i heard Nader he struck me just weird.... At the moment i have no problem voting for him and like i said, most Americans know Independent so thats a plus against Obama and McCain..

 

[JosephTheLibertarian]

I didn't know there was a tolerance grayness.

You can tolerate someone more then someone else?

Yeah. Write-in proponents are much more tolerable than...you know. That was my first position after I realized that RP was not going to win the GOP nomination.

 

[JosephTheLibertarian]

BTW: i don't care for Nader and know very little about him, but the fact that he sat down with RP on CNN and called for all to vote 3rd party changed my mind in a heart beat. First time i heard Nader he struck me just weird.... At the moment i have no problem voting for him and like i said, most Americans know Independent so thats a plus against Obama and McCain..

Well, his policies are enough to turn me off. I don't think I like any of his positions

 

[BuddyRey]

I don't care if it won't be counted, I am writing in Ron Paul. The only man WORTHY of my vote will GET my vote!!!

 

[Kludge]

Well, his policies are enough to turn me off. I don't think I like any of his positions

Don't be hatin' on the heterosexuals, now...

 

[JosephTheLibertarian]

Don't be hatin' on the heterosexuals, now...

I'm a solosexual right now.

 

[torchbearer]

I don't care if it won't be counted, I am writing in Ron Paul. The only man WORTHY of my vote will GET my vote!!!

Do you believe in following the constitution?
One of the reason for getting ron a slate of electors in louisiana was so the people who wanted to write-in ron paul would have their votes counted.
The only person who can vote directly on a presidential candidate is a presidential elector.
Being that we profess to uphold such laws as our constitution, we should all be voting on electors who will vote for ron paul.
That one caveat makes writing in ron paul for congress and writing in ron paul for president, two completely different matters.
You can vote directly on your congressman, not on your president.

 

[torchbearer]

I'm a solosexual right now.

Nothing more libertarian than self-love.

 

[Kludge]

Do you believe in following the constitution?
One of the reason for getting ron a slate of electors in louisiana was so the people who wanted to write-in ron paul would have their votes counted.
The only person who can vote directly on a presidential candidate is a presidential elector.
Being that we profess to uphold such laws as our constitution, we should all be voting on electors who will vote for ron paul.
That one caveat makes writing in ron paul for congress and writing in ron paul for president, two completely different matters.
You can vote directly on your congressman, not on your president.

There's something we never discuss here... direct vs. indirect voting for senators.

 

[DAFTEK]

Well, his policies are enough to turn me off. I don't think I like any of his positions

Well WTF, first people praise Barr, now they trash him, Baldwin the same, so far i haven't found a thread on Nader so who know by the time 4th gets here. But i have always said i like Chuck after RP Look, bottom line is we need to vote for anyone 3rd party. It all makes sense what RP says in my view...

 

[JosephTheLibertarian]

Well WTF, first people praise Barr, now they trash him, Baldwin the same, so far i haven't found a thread on Nader so who know by the time 4th gets here. But i have always said i like Chuck after RP Look, bottom line is we need to vote for anyone 3rd party. It all makes sense what RP says in my view...

First figure out who will be on your state's ballot

 

[DAFTEK]

I don't care if it won't be counted, I am writing in Ron Paul. The only man WORTHY of my vote will GET my vote!!!

Click my signature and let me know what you think, tell me how it makes more sense to fight with a write in vs. voting 3rd party...

 

[DAFTEK]

First figure out who will be on your state's ballot

Iowa? Nader should be on it.

 

[JosephTheLibertarian]

Iowa? nadder should be on it.

Most people on here attack Barr because they wanted Ruwart to win. They're playing LP politics under the pretense of being unbiased.

but that's just my unbiased opinion